-11-18 0:43, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > 17.11.2021 17:16, Rene Ladan wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:37:07AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >>> P.S. AFAIK our documented criteria for removing a port is when one of
> the
> >>> following is true:
> >>&
ing to a modern version of python"
So I guess there is still a chance to get lang/pypy3 back? If and while
lang/python27 is still there and is not going to be kicked out tomorrow.
-Max
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 2:16 AM Rene Ladan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:37:07AM -0800, Maxim Sobole
P.S. AFAIK our documented criteria for removing a port is when one of the
following is true:
o Port lacks maintaintership;
o Port has issues building on supported releases;
o Port clearly has no users/use;
o Port has some serious security issues.
The lang/python27 did not belong to either of t
Hi,
I am still a bit concerned with the total removal of python 2.7 year ago
and its support, I think this was a somewhat swift decision that may need
to be re-considered. I understand the urge for portmgr to move base over to
a supported version, but also that caused few important packages to be
