Re: lang/gcc13 build dependency registers as pkg dependency for completely unrelated packages

2025-03-06 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
On 2025-03-04 20:18, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: On 2025-03-04 18:05, Gleb Popov wrote: On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 7:44 PM Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: Is my base polluted? My understanding is that something in flac uses the libgcc_s.so library. Despite the name, this library is not specific to GCC

Re: lang/gcc13 build dependency registers as pkg dependency for completely unrelated packages

2025-03-04 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
On 2025-03-04 17:16, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: ... No idea why 'ibgcc_s.so.1' is listed in flac... Thanks for your help, I guess I have to investigate what went wrong beforehand... Unfortunately no time this week. My build environment used to work quiet well until recently.  Will

Re: lang/gcc13 build dependency registers as pkg dependency for completely unrelated packages

2025-03-04 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
On 2025-03-04 16:40, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: On 2025-03-04 13:34, Gleb Popov wrote: On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 1:56 PM Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: Today I noticed, that lang/gcc13 gets post hoc registered as dependency for completely unrelated packages! This is the provides/requires mechanism

Re: lang/gcc13 build dependency registers as pkg dependency for completely unrelated packages

2025-03-04 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
On 2025-03-04 18:05, Gleb Popov wrote: On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 7:44 PM Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: Is my base polluted? My understanding is that something in flac uses the libgcc_s.so library. Despite the name, this library is not specific to GCC and we have an alternative implementation

Re: lang/gcc13 build dependency registers as pkg dependency for completely unrelated packages

2025-03-04 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
On 2025-03-04 16:58, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: On 2025-03-04 16:40, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: On 2025-03-04 13:34, Gleb Popov wrote: On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 1:56 PM Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: Today I noticed, that lang/gcc13 gets post hoc registered as dependency for completely unrelated

Re: lang/gcc13 build dependency registers as pkg dependency for completely unrelated packages

2025-03-04 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
On 2025-03-04 13:34, Gleb Popov wrote: On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 1:56 PM Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: Today I noticed, that lang/gcc13 gets post hoc registered as dependency for completely unrelated packages! This is the provides/requires mechanism of pkg, which started to have a broader effect

lang/gcc13 build dependency registers as pkg dependency for completely unrelated packages

2025-03-04 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
Today I noticed, that lang/gcc13 gets post hoc registered as dependency for completely unrelated packages! If I install packages of which none depends on gcc13 (by pkg(1)) and install gcc13 afterwards (via pkg(1)) the previously installed dependency free packages suddenly seem to have a depende

Another berserker victim: 03b36d9 textproc/obsidian: Remove expired port

2024-06-16 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
Please stop removing perfectly working ports from the tree. textproc/obsidian is the latest victim, just because it currently depends on devel/electron25 - which builds and runs perfectly well too. User can in-app update obsidian. If the package building team already blacklisted devel/electron2

Re: How do I depend on a flavoured PHP port? The Handbook is wrong??

2021-09-12 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
Am 07.09.2021 um 04:15 schrieb Mel Pilgrim: On 2021-09-06 17:35, Tatsuki Makino wrote: Mel Pilgrim wrote on 2021/09/04 09:36: I'm trying to add a dependency on a flavoured PHP application, but the Porter's Handbook (section 7.3.1) instructions don't work.  It says to just add "@${PHP_FLAVOR}"