Would it be possible for someone to review and commit the following?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281910
As of 33d3fd27d7 this patch builds with the same `make test` with extra
warnings.
Would it be possible to get 279803 [1] committed to ports?
[1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279803
Looking for reviews of the simplification of the ttrssd script from
www/tt-rss.
While looking to add status I realized with daemon the need to
check/wait for a local database could be transitioned in to daemon's -r
-R options retrying the child process on failure and move this to
command and comma
Could I get someone to commit this?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278761
Any chance someone could commit the follow bug 276480
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276480
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 03:06:47AM EST, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Am 2023-11-15 22:42, schrieb Derek Schrock:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 09:01:28AM EST, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have stuff which depends upon openjdk17 -> pkg exi
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 09:01:28AM EST, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have stuff which depends upon openjdk17 -> pkg exists in my local repo.
> Now I want to use something which needs openjdk21. So I did a poudriere bulk
> -j ... java/openjdk21 and now it builds openjdk18, openjdk19 and o
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 06:22:24PM EDT, Yuri wrote:
> For example: graphics/libprojectm, audio/libinstpatch, misc/py-pytorch.
>
>
> Some of them also say that the compiler is crashing:
> > checking whether the C++ compiler works... Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> > no
>
> Something is really
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 06:33:05PM EDT, Derek Schrock wrote:
> tl;dr Removing feature patches in mail/mutt! Do you care?
If you're looking to comment/test anything before hand.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272194
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40754
Looking for a committer to commit the following PR.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271395
Thanks.
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 06:45:48PM EDT, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
>Not saying what to do but trying to continue to build up my
> understanding of ports tree structure in general with my questions.
> Wouldn't telling users after install/upgrade be telling them that there
> is now a pr
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 06:04:35PM EDT, Amar Takhar wrote:
> It would be nice to have a message in pkg-message explaining the port is now
> vanilla outside of fixes and anyone looking for former patches should try
> NeoMutt.
Yeah, I'm looking right now at adding a pkg-message to output a message
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 01:04:00AM EDT, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> I use %I specifier from vvv.initials (QUOTE_PATCH option), but have vvv.quote
> commented out in the port's Makefile. I don't remember exactly why, it seems
> caused some formatting issues.
It seems you're already building locally? If t
tl;dr Removing feature patches in mail/mutt! Do you care?
A recent bug [1] has been created with a claim that one of the remote
patches QUOTE_PATCH [2] causes issues even without using the feature.
This patch was originally a vvv patch [3] left unmaintained then later
taken over by some capacity
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:20:04AM EST, Alex V. Petrov wrote:
> Last versions FF have very low perfomance of WebGL.
>
> Compare with Chromium (https://webglsamples.org/aquarium/aquarium.html):
> 1 fish
> Chromium - 60 Fps
> FF - 6 Fps
> (I have GF 1070)
>
> Some time ago these values were abo
On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 03:25:40PM EST, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> I asked this a long time ago, back when FreeBSD was still on Subversion,
> and the answer back then was "not really". Has that changed?
>
> What I need is the ability to retrieve the output of git log -1
If you look at https://pkg-st
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:26:51AM EST, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Anyone able to commit mail/py-offlineimap3 and its depends. I've been
> > using it locally for a while (connected to gmail) without issue.
> >
> > mail/py-offlineimap3
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262
Anyone able to commit mail/py-offlineimap3 and its depends. I've been
using it locally for a while (connected to gmail) without issue.
mail/py-offlineimap3
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262233
mail/py-rfc6555
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262231
mail/py-i
On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 02:31:18PM EDT, Derek Schrock wrote:
> Can anyone help push these along? Updates to www/node ports.
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266595
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266594
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Can anyone help push these along? Updates to www/node ports.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266595
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266594
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266596
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266591
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 11:13:08PM EDT, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> I went to install Samba, could only see net/samba412 and net/samba413.
> 4.12 was EOL 2021-09-20. 4.13 was EOL 2022-03-21.
>
> Where are the ports for supported versions of Samba?
>
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 07:46:41PM EDT, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've started to use ccache with poudriere again passed some years now and
> I've noticed that we still use ccache legacy 3.x version.
>
> Any special reason or imcompatibility for no updating to 4.x version?
>
> Thanks,
>
Can we get www/node14 updated? Safe to call maintain timeout?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263090
With a review: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35192
It's possible I can get the CVE updates for on www/node* this
weekend too but I'd rather not make 14 wait for them.
Could anyone commit this update?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256405
I'm not seeing any reason for it to be held back.
24 matches
Mail list logo
