Re: www/chromium build failing?

2025-05-05 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 10:17:58PM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running 14-stable/amd64, updated 2025-03-14, and I'm currently seeing > www/chromium builds failing with: > > gen/third_party/blink/renderer/core/css/css_property_names.cc:354:7: error: > fallthrough annotation does not

Re: www/chromium build failure on 14-STABLE

2025-03-23 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 10:15:03PM +, Jonathan Chen wrote: > Hi, > > Building www/chromium 134.0.6998.165 on my 14-STABLE/amd64 currently fails > with: > > ../../third_party/webrtc/modules/video_capture/linux/pipewire_session.cc:90:3: > error: no matching function for call to 'pw_node_add_l

Packaging poudriere-built www/chromium fails...?

2025-01-25 Thread David Wolfskill
TL;DR: poudriere build log for www/chromium ends with: ... === === = env: 'PKG_NOTES=build_timestamp built_by' 'PKG_NOTE_build_timestamp=2025-01-25T15:03:22+00:00' 'PKG_NOTE

Re: Why does pkg insist on replacing "normal" ports with -nox11 ones?

2024-12-24 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 5:47 PM David Wolfskill wrote: > > > > I don't get it. Why would pkg want to be installing "-nox11" > > versions of things? > > Why not? You specified a port origin ra

Why does pkg insist on replacing "normal" ports with -nox11 ones?

2024-12-24 Thread David Wolfskill
As an experiment, I set up my newest laptop to update only via freebsd-update and installed only pre-built packages. (I am far more accustomed to building FreeBSD from source, as well as updating ports either via portmaster or by buidling my own packages, so there's a fairly high probability that

Re: www/chromium-128.0.6613.84 build failure (amd64; poudriere)

2024-08-29 Thread David Wolfskill
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 07:19:54AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > I should have checked ports-committers first. Looks like the fix went in > this morning. > Confirmed: after updating my ports tree (in my case, to main-n675360-efd8eb280e0b), I was able to (eventually!) build chromium-128.0.6613.

www/chromium-128.0.6613.84 build failure (amd64; poudriere)

2024-08-27 Thread David Wolfskill
My build machine gets the task of building packages for www/chromium for the machines that actually use it. And it (and its earlier instantiation) has been using poudriere-devel for package-building since July, 2015. Given the VuXML entry for chromium and the recent update of the latter to 128.0.

dns/bind{918,-tools} & protobuf-c

2024-08-11 Thread David Wolfskill
TL;DR: I found that I needed to (manually) reinstall bind-tools-9.18.28.pkg & bind918-9.18.28.pkg. For my small installation at home (2 "production" machines; 1 "build" machine, and some laptops that are (along with the build machine) treated as "development" machines), I build my own pack

Re: perl build failure?

2024-08-10 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 08:05:25PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > How is perl 5.36.3 the default version when it dies with > > WARNING: re-sorting MANIFEST > *** [MANIFEST.srt] Error code 1 > > make: stopped making "all" in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.36/work/perl-5.36.3 > --- lib/auto/re/re.so --- > Unsu

[Maintainer] Help determining proper LICENSE for x11-wm/piewm?

2024-05-25 Thread David Wolfskill
A PR (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279111) has been opened with the intent to supply a suitable LICENSE for the x11-wm/piewm port. I am the maintainer of the port (out of self-defense, more than anything else); I am unable to determine what would make sense in this case: * Th

[Resolved] Re: www/firefox: Python(?) issues building under poudriere (stable/14)

2024-05-18 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 07:29:29AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > TL;DR: As the Subject says; log & info at > https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/ports/firefox/ > Today's poudriere run built www/firefox OK. Details of the environment: Build machine wa

www/firefox: Python(?) issues building under poudriere (stable/14)

2024-05-11 Thread David Wolfskill
TL;DR: As the Subject says; log & info at https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/ports/firefox/ Additional detail: I have 2 broad categories of FreeBSD machines here at home (all amd64): * Development machines (a build machine & some laptops) * Production machines (a multi-homed "traffic cop"/g

Re: Build failure for graphics/drm-515-kmod in CURRENT

2024-03-15 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 07:44:47PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > Hi David, > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 06:49:18 -0700 > David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > > The complete build typescript may be found at > > https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/ports/drm-515-

Re: Build failure for graphics/drm-515-kmod in CURRENT

2024-03-14 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 07:44:47PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > Hi David, > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 06:49:18 -0700 > David Wolfskill wrote: > > > This is on my laptop, during a source-based update from > > main-n268772-906521f8176b to main-n268800-6a6ec90681

Build failure for graphics/drm-515-kmod in CURRENT

2024-03-14 Thread David Wolfskill
This is on my laptop, during a source-based update from main-n268772-906521f8176b to main-n268800-6a6ec90681cf, in the "make buildkernel" phase, as a result of: g1-70(15.0-C)[3] grep PORT /etc/src.conf PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver-390 PORTS_MODULES+=graphics/drm-515-kmod (which has been there

Re: [Solved?] Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-04 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 08:12:14PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > For the last "yes" entry, the build machine was running: > FreeBSD 14.0-STABLE #33 stable/14-n266091-1e9df419f14c: Sat Dec 30 11:51:06 > UTC 2023 > r...@freebeast.catwhisker.org:/common/S1/ob

Re: [Solved?] Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-04 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 12:35:33PM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > I recently saw a similar problem and thought I had looked into something, but > this was it. > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports/2024-February/005546.html > > David Wolfskill wrote on 2024/03/05 10

[Solved?] Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-04 Thread David Wolfskill
Well... I had managed to get myself confused. In fairness, some of the clues I was getting were misleading (at best). TL;DR: After rebuilding a few packages, re-installing them, finding that that didn't help, then force-re-installing the most recently-built package for dns/libidn (libidn-1.38_1;

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:25:30PM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > ... > One of the reasons for the name libc.so.6 was also present, including the > following > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260434 > Or, if linux emulator is used, it also contains *.6 of lib.c. > Ah: Thank

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 08:03:53AM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > > David Wolfskill wrote on 2024/03/04 03:33: > > ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libtasn1.so.6: version LIBTASN1_0_3 required by > > /usr/local/lib/libgnutls.so.30 not defined > > I don't kno

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 01:01:36PM -0600, rob...@rrbrussell.com wrote: > On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, at 12:33, David Wolfskill wrote: > > I have a local package-builder that's (generally) been working quite > > well for me since Jul 2015 (through a couple of hardware replacement

How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread David Wolfskill
I have a local package-builder that's (generally) been working quite well for me since Jul 2015 (through a couple of hardware replacements, sure, but the approach remains the same). Today, in trying to chase down what was causing my central "hub" machine to whine: ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libt

Scary update: devel/fstrm-0.6.1 -> fstrm-0.6.1_1

2024-02-25 Thread David Wolfskill
Symptom was: albert(14.0-S)[4] sudo service named restart Password: named not running? (check /var/run/named/pid). ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libfstrm.so.0: version LIBFSTRM_0.2.0 required by /usr/local/lib/libdns-9.18.24.so not defined /usr/local/etc/rc.d/named: ERROR: named-checkconf for /usr

Re: how to checkout ports for 14-stable

2023-11-30 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:29:55PM -0500, AN wrote: > ... > > origin/2023Q3 > > origin/2023Q4 > > origin/HEAD -> origin/main > > origin/main > > > > (so, remove the "origin/" part to get the branch name)/(so, remove the > > "origin/" part to get the branch name)/ > ... > Thanks for your qui

Re: how to checkout ports for 14-stable

2023-11-30 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 08:24:47PM -0500, AN wrote: > Hi: > > I just upgraded a system to src 14-stable. What is the exact command to > checkout and track the 14-stable branch of ports? There is no such thing as "the 14-stable branch of ports." FreeBSD source ("src") and ports are separate repo

Build failure: using poudriere-devel to build www/chromium

2023-09-27 Thread David Wolfskill
This was while the build host was running stable/12 (stable/12-n236282-b083794291d2). A subsequent attempt whlie it was running stable/13 (stable/13-n256426-d03af6473e64) was OK. Log is in https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/ports/chromium/; there's a compressed copy and an uncompressed one

Re: devel/electron22 build failure with devel/icu update

2023-04-13 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 02:44:01AM +, j...@chen.org.nz wrote: > Hi, > > I'm seeing the following build failure for electron22-22.3.5_1 on > STABLE-13/amd64 after the latest devel/icu update: > Please see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=270817 (which directly references

Re: www/chromium: build failed using poudriere in stable/12

2023-04-13 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 07:03:52AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > So the "U_NOEXCEPT" lines are in the (older) icu-72.1,1. > > But on machines that have been updated this morning, I see: > > freebeast(12.4-S)[6] pkg info -o icu\* > icu-73.1,1

Re: www/chromium: build failed using poudriere in stable/12

2023-04-13 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 06:33:37AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 03:26:53PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > ... > > In file included from ../../base/time/time_exploded_icu.cc:14: > > ../../third_party/icu/source/common/unicode/locid.h:297:27: error: ex

Re: www/chromium: build failed using poudriere in stable/12

2023-04-13 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 03:26:53PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 13 Apr 2023, at 14:05, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > > Details in https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/ports/chromium/ > > (Log is under 12/ in there.) > ... > > The lines you posted didn'

www/chromium: build failed using poudriere in stable/12

2023-04-13 Thread David Wolfskill
Details in https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/ports/chromium/ (Log is under 12/ in there.) Overview: Ports tree is at main-n615777-7e591c4f2380; build machine was running: FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 12.4-STABLE FreeBSD 12.4-STABLE #206 stable/12-n236099-59f3510ea793: Mon Apr 10 10:3

www/chromium: build fails on stable/12 (amd64) - both poudriere and portmaster

2023-02-25 Thread David Wolfskill
So... I tried several times to submit this bug via bugzilla, and each time was told (after about a minute of waiting): Secure Connection Failed An error occurred during a connection to bugs.freebsd.org. The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the

Re: 2 port build failures using poudriere (each involves glib)

2022-11-26 Thread David Wolfskill
Sorry for the noise; I see (now) that author Jan Beich 2022-11-26 14:01:23 + committer Jan Beich 2022-11-26 14:17:10 + commit 4b211242030e4160d54bd302770c253c5392d2ee (patch) devel/glib20: unbreak some C++ consumers after 27fe5eff9577 should address the issues I noted. Peace,

2 port build failures using poudriere (each involves glib)

2022-11-26 Thread David Wolfskill
I note that the devel/glib20 port was just updated from 2.74.1 to 2.74.2 recently. Ports that failed to build were graphics/gegl and net/wireshark. Copies of logs are in https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/ports/2022-11-26/ Those for stable/12 are in the "12" subdirectory; similarly for "1

Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in make.conf causes www/apache24 to fail

2022-11-24 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:22:01AM -0500, Michael Jung wrote: > ... > As of 2022-11-24 ~10:00 AM EST if you have /usr/ports made using > portsnap or poudriere  tracking main > ... > poudriere: > > ===>  apache24-2.4.54 : Error from apache.mk. WITH(OUT)_MODULES has been > removed, use www_apache2

Re: Poudriere: Dependency loop detected

2022-11-10 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:15:31PM +0100, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Hello, > > Trying to run poudriere (bulk or testport) fails with this error: > > [00:00:05] Error: Dependency loop detected: > These packages depend on each other: libgd-2.3.3_3,1 libavif-0.11.1 aom-3.5.0 > libjxl-0.7.0 openexr-3.

Re: Problem with NVIDIA drivers 390 and 470 on current

2022-09-25 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:30:07PM -0300, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm updated my box to last 14-current today and I get error on ports > compialtion. > Please see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266561 Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill

[Resolved?] Re: What is this "gi" Python module that x11-toolkits/gtk40 wants?

2022-09-11 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 02:08:24PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 07:21:16PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > > David Wolfskill writes: > > > > > | Adding test "reftest wrapping-in-boxes-in-boxes.ui" > > > | Program python

Re: What is this "gi" Python module that x11-toolkits/gtk40 wants?

2022-09-11 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 07:21:16PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > David Wolfskill writes: > > > | Adding test "reftest wrapping-in-boxes-in-boxes.ui" > > | Program python3 (gi) found: NO > > | > > | testsuite/introspection/meson.build:1:0: ERROR: python3 is m

Re: What is this "gi" Python module that x11-toolkits/gtk40 wants?

2022-09-11 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 06:28:35PM +0300, Dima Panov wrote: > > Just curious -- did you rebuild/reinstall *ALL* 'py3*-*' modules after > bump default python from 3.8 to 3.9? > Not sure -- that was a while back, and I only keep build typescripts for a limited time. In any case, given t

Re: What is this "gi" Python module that x11-toolkits/gtk40 wants?

2022-09-11 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 05:47:31PM +0300, Dima Panov wrote: > Moin! > > On 11.09.2022 17:04, David Wolfskill wrote: > > ... > > The tail end of that "full log" reads: > > > > | Adding test "reftest wrapping-in-boxes-in-boxes.ui" >

What is this "gi" Python module that x11-toolkits/gtk40 wants?

2022-09-11 Thread David Wolfskill
Of my "development" machines, one is a headless "build machine" and the other two are laptops (one around 10 years old that I'm trying to retire; the other only about 6 years old that I'm trying to be able to use the way I can the older one -- but that;s tangential to the issue at hand). The build

Re: Attempt to build devel/tex-web2c under stable/13 via poudriere fails

2022-09-10 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 09:00:36PM +0200, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote: > ... > So far I cannot reproduce this. > > http://pdr.bofh.network/data/latest-per-pkg/tex-web2c/20210325/131-default.log After the "poudriere bulk" completed, I re-ran it (without changing the ports tree or the underlying s

Attempt to build devel/tex-web2c under stable/13 via poudriere fails

2022-09-10 Thread David Wolfskill
This is on my "build machine," presently running: FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 13.1-STABLE FreeBSD 13.1-STABLE #161 stable/13-n252375-3f4e44f38c9: Sat Sep 10 11:25:03 UTC 2022 r...@freebeast.catwhisker.org:/common/S3/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC amd64 1301507 1301507 with a port

Re: Upgrade of gcc11-11.3.0 to gcc11-11.3.0_1 requires >= 4.8G /tmp

2022-08-26 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 04:06:39PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > ... > Disable LTO_BOOTSTRAP port option or see > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265254 Good to know; thanks. In any case, one of the laptops finished OK (after having increased tmpfs to 8G). (I had needed to suspend

Upgrade of gcc11-11.3.0 to gcc11-11.3.0_1 requires >= 4.8G /tmp

2022-08-26 Thread David Wolfskill
Saw this on a couple of laptops, each of which is configured to use a swap-backed tmpfs for /tmp -- started at 2G, which didn't work so well. Looks as if they are over the worst of it, and I've seen /tmp/get to 4.8G used -- in cdase this helps someone else avoid some of the hassle. (This was amd6

Re: firefox-104.0,2 crashing

2022-08-17 Thread David Wolfskill
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:05:06PM -0400, Jesús Daniel Colmenares Oviedo wrote: > ... > But you are using DNS. Of course. > Can you try to reproduce the problem without DNS? Probably not: I have booted the machine in environments where there is no PTR record for the IP address; no issues. > I

Re: firefox-104.0,2 crashing

2022-08-17 Thread David Wolfskill
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 06:06:33PM -0400, Jesús Daniel Colmenares Oviedo wrote: > ... > You need an entry in /etc/hosts for each display name in `xauth list`. > Look at my /etc/hosts: > > ``` > $ egrep '^[^#]' /etc/hosts > ::1 localhost localhost.my.domain > 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.my.domain

Re: Resolved: devel/llvm13 build: "ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed"

2022-08-13 Thread David Wolfskill
f email messages (in this thread) from Martin Waschbüsch, Moin Rahman, and Brooks Davis. Specifically, the last-cited message: | Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 21:08:42 +0000 | From: Brooks Davis | To: David Wolfskill | Cc: freebsd-po...@freebsd.org | Subject: Re: devel/llvm13 build: "ninja: bu

Resolved: devel/llvm13 build: "ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed"

2022-08-13 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 09:08:42PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > An ill-advised update was made to textproc/py-sphinx-markdown-tables which > broke llvm13 and later. Hopefully it will be reverted soon. > > -- Brooks > Just a confirmation that a local git revert 5a0fd27b2f9b47b120800

Re: devel/llvm13 build: "ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed"

2022-08-12 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 09:08:42PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > An ill-advised update was made to textproc/py-sphinx-markdown-tables which > broke llvm13 and later. Hopefully it will be reverted soon. > > -- Brooks > Ah -- thanks. That provides me with enough clue to work something out, I

devel/llvm13 build: "ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed"

2022-08-12 Thread David Wolfskill
This was using poudriere, on a real amd64 machine with: Aug 12 04:13:35 freebeast kernel: real memory = 206152138752 (196602 MB) Aug 12 04:13:35 freebeast kernel: avail memory = 200736665600 (191437 MB) in both: FreeBSD 12.3-STABLE #89 stable/12-n235538-4291bca854b: Fri Aug 12 03:33:24 PDT 2022

Re: x11/nvidia-driver update to 470.63.01 seems to break GK106GLM [Quadro K2100M]

2021-09-24 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 09:32:18AM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 1:36 PM David Wolfskill wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 01:32:19PM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote: > > > See if it is reproducible with a 13 or main kernel, there is a locking >

Odd whine from grep in www/chromium?

2021-09-02 Thread David Wolfskill
It doesn't seem to cause a real "problem," but... it doesn't look quite ideal, either: E.g.: g1-48(12.2-S)[1] cd /usr/ports/www/chromium/ g1-48(12.2-S)[2] make showconfig make: "/common/ports/www/chromium/Makefile" line 210: warning: "/usr/bin/grep mempcpy /usr/include/string.h" returned non-zero

Re: x11/nvidia-driver update to 470.63.01 seems to break GK106GLM [Quadro K2100M]

2021-08-30 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 09:32:18AM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 1:36 PM David Wolfskill wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 01:32:19PM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote: > > > See if it is reproducible with a 13 or main kernel, there is a locking >

Re: x11/nvidia-driver update to 470.63.01 seems to break GK106GLM [Quadro K2100M]

2021-08-29 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 01:32:19PM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote: > See if it is reproducible with a 13 or main kernel, there is a locking change > which may interact differently on the different branches so that would > be a good thing to know. This may need nvidia help since the error > seems to be

x11/nvidia-driver update to 470.63.01 seems to break GK106GLM [Quadro K2100M]

2021-08-29 Thread David Wolfskill
A few days ago, I returned home from a couple of weeks away (during which I did not do my usual daily updates to FreeBSD & installed ports). Yesterday, when I updated my main laptop's stable/12 environment, I found that the machine did not initialize X11 (I use xdm) as expected; rather, the screen

Re: x11/nvidia-driver update from 460.80 to 460.80_1: libglvnd

2021-06-17 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 01:53:26PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > ... > Force-remove mesa-libs then rebuild all its direct dependencies. > libGL, libEGL, libGLESv2, etc. moved to libglvnd but libgbm, libglapi > remained in mesa-libs, so some of the ports (e.g., mesa-dri, xorg-server, > sdl2) > would de

Re: x11/nvidia-driver update from 460.80 to 460.80_1: libglvnd

2021-06-17 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 04:04:07AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > So... at this point, I am unclear on how to make both x11/nvidia-driver > and things from the above list like ... Web browsers (for example) able > to coexist on the same system. > ... OK; I muddled throug

x11/nvidia-driver update from 460.80 to 460.80_1: libglvnd

2021-06-17 Thread David Wolfskill
On my laptops, I have been using x11/nvidia-driver (quite successfully) for several years. As I update FreeBSD base and installed ports daily on those machines, I have PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver in /etc/src.conf, so the kernel modules get rebuilt when the kernel does; that has all worked q