Re: php81-xml and libxml2 problems

On Mon 30 Jun 02:10, Jack L. wrote: > Yes, it seems the libxml2 upgrade has broken all my ports that depend on it > since those ports didn't get a bumped portrevision > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 2:08 AM Tatsuki Makino > wrote: > > > Um. > > > > I don't know :), but it might just be a specific ve

Re: php81-xml and libxml2 problems

On Mon 30 Jun 11:33, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Am 30.06.2025 um 06:09 schrieb void: > > > > [1/1] Upgrading pkg from 2.1.2 to 2.2.1... > > [1/1] Extracting pkg-2.2.1: 100% > > Updating poudriere repository catalogue... > > poudriere repository is up to date. > > All repositories are up to date. >

Re: armv7 -> pkg: No SRV record found for the repo 'FreeBSD'

On Wed 23 Apr 11:53, Ronald Klop wrote: > Hi, > > Since a while I get this error in my armv7 jail on aarch64. > > What can I do to debug this? Or is something missing on the pkg server? > > Regards, > Ronald. > > > [root@armv7 ~]# pkg upgrade -r FreeBSD -n > Updating FreeBSD repository catalog

Re: FYI: Attempt to test the updated ports-mgmt/pkg-devel with poudriere-devel got nesting installations attempts for `-- Installing glib-bootstrap-2.84.1,2...

Le 17 avril 2025 16:55:19 GMT+02:00, Mark Millard a écrit : >On Apr 16, 2025, at 13:24, Mark Millard wrote: > >> >> >> ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/glib-bootstrap-2.84.1,2.pkg >> [aarch64PBase] Installing glib-bootstrap-2.84.1,2... >> [aarch64PBase] `-- Installing libiconv-1

Re: FYI: Attempt to test the updated ports-mgmt/pkg-devel with poudriere-devel got nesting installations attempts for `-- Installing glib-bootstrap-2.84.1,2...

On Wed 16 Apr 22:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed 16 Apr 13:24, Mark Millard wrote: > > > > > > ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/glib-bootstrap-2.84.1,2.pkg > > [aarch64PBase] Installing glib-bootstrap-2.84.1,2... > > [aarch64P

Re: FYI: Attempt to test the updated ports-mgmt/pkg-devel with poudriere-devel got nesting installations attempts for `-- Installing glib-bootstrap-2.84.1,2...

On Wed 16 Apr 13:24, Mark Millard wrote: > > > ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/glib-bootstrap-2.84.1,2.pkg > [aarch64PBase] Installing glib-bootstrap-2.84.1,2... > [aarch64PBase] `-- Installing libiconv-1.17_1... > [aarch64PBase] `-- Extracting libiconv-1.17_1: .. done >

Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer [a specific package with large time factor]

On Mon 07 Apr 15:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > > Listing like this is clearly not any useful, the problem we have is the > > performance changes depending on what is happening in parallel on the > > machines. > > Sound

Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer [a specific package with large time factor]

On Mon 07 Apr 08:07, Mark Millard wrote: > On Apr 6, 2025, at 21:11, Gleb Popov <6year...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 2:44 AM Mark Millard wrote: > >> > >> So: 2 min 31 sec or so difference for overall somewhat over an > >> hour, i.e., 151 sec or so. That is under 1 sec per pa

Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer

On Sun 06 Apr 13:27, Mark Millard wrote: > [I thought of another question.] > > On Apr 6, 2025, at 10:53, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On Apr 6, 2025, at 08:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > >> Le 5 avril 2025 06:58:12 GMT+02:00, Mark Millard a > &g

Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer

Le 5 avril 2025 06:58:12 GMT+02:00, Mark Millard a écrit : >[This is an update of earlier notes, now that I've noticed what >is different for the contexts that not seeing larger time frames >in the Mar-29/Apr-01 bulk build starts of official package builds.] > >The context here is the official bul

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

12 mars 2025 à 16:01 "Nuno Teixeira" mailto:edua...@freebsd.org?to=%22Nuno%20Teixeira%22%20%3Ceduardo%40freebsd.org%3E > a écrit: > > > > > This is expected, the nvidia-driver is shipping some 32bit library which are > > linked to an hypothetical libx11.so.6:32, so either use the same trick as

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

On Wed 12 Mar 14:23, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > (...) > > pkg-2.0.6 + poudriere-devel-3.4.99.20250209 + ports main 20250312 > > poudriere bulk x11/nvidia-driver (default options): > Warning: nvidia-driver-550.127.05.1500034 will be rebuilt as it misses > libX11.so.6:32 This is expected, the nvidia-d

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

On Thu 13 Feb 13:55, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > Maybe we can open a go PR demonstrating this results and a link to > https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/pull/1204 > > Maybe go team understand the problem? > > Cheers No, I do understand the issue, for nvidia-driver, this is the port that provides a

Re: pkg upgrade foot shooting

On Wed 12 Feb 22:03, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:31 PM Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > > Kevin Oberman writes: > > > Any pkg command gets: > > > The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. > > > Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: > > > but tr

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

Le 1 février 2025 23:36:12 GMT+01:00, Guido Falsi a écrit : >On 01/02/25 22:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Sat 01 Feb 22:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote: >>>&g

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

On Sat 01 Feb 22:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote: > > > On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > > > Hello Rainer, > > > > > > > > > Wouldn'

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote: > > On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > > Hello Rainer, > > > > > > > Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved? After all, he > > &g

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hello Rainer, > > > > > Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved? After all, he has > > > worked intensively on the pkg updates. > > > > Yes it is. I'm CC'ing bapt@. > > Since this issue was pest

Re: Regression in pkg: it complains about missing pkg files instead of downloading them

Le 26 janvier 2025 06:21:47 GMT+01:00, Yuri a écrit : >Since pkg was updated to 2.x I am experiencing the errors like in the log >below. > >Instead of downloading a *.pkg file pkg complains that it can't find it and >fails. > >It complains about different *.pkg files, not just the one in the log

Re: CFT: repository for kernel modules

On Thu 26 Dec 13:26, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 13/12/2024 16:28, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri 13 Dec 07:24, Alan Somers wrote: > > > Success! With drm-61-kmod-6.1.92.1402000_3 I can kldload 915kms on > > > FreeBSD 14.2. Before switching to this repo, kldload wo

Re: CFT: repository for kernel modules

On Fri 13 Dec 07:24, Alan Somers wrote: > Success! With drm-61-kmod-6.1.92.1402000_3 I can kldload 915kms on > FreeBSD 14.2. Before switching to this repo, kldload would hang. > > Also, in addition to kmods, there are a few other ports that must be > rebuilt for every minor version. devel/py-lib

Re: Unable to update repository FreeBSD-kmods

On Fri 13 Dec 13:35, Graham Perrin wrote: > On 13/12/2024 08:09, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > … > > > > > https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/kmods-quarterly.conf.txt > > Best regards, > > Bapt > > > Thank you! > > > An early test result

CFT: repository for kernel modules

Hello everyone, In our current release model the binary packages are built on the lowest supported version of a given branch. Which means when 14.2, the packages it is using are built on 14.1 until 14.1's EOL which is march 31st. This works greate for everything but kernel modules, beside develop

Re: what is pkg annotation ports_top_git_hash?

On Thu 05 Sep 11:30, Ronald Klop wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking into some metadata of a pkg. > I found annotation ports_top_git_hash which looks like what I'm looking for. > > But I found that not all pkgs in one build have the same 'ports_top_git_hash'. > > See for example: > curl -s https://pkg.

Re: Why does 'pkg install -A xx' reinstall pkg?

On Sun 02 Jun 13:50, Yuri wrote: > I saw it many times how 'pkg install -A xx' reinstalls pkg: > > > > Installed packages to be REINSTALLED: > > >    pkg-1.21.3 > > > > > It doesn't explain the reason. > > > Why is such operation ever needed? > > > The package version doesn't change,

Re: pkg upgrade odity

2 mai 2024 à 11:09 "Alexander Leidinger" a écrit: > > Am 2024-05-02 09:33, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > > > > > Do you have a copy of the abseil package with the wrong > shlibs_provides? > > > > If yes I would love to be able to analys

Re: pkg upgrade odity

2 mai 2024 à 09:28 "Alexander Leidinger" a écrit: > > Am 2024-05-01 09:52, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > > > > > Le 30 avril 2024 23:30:16 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger > > > a écrit : > > > > > > > > Am 2024-04-30 23:11,

Re: pkg upgrade odity

Le 30 avril 2024 23:30:16 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger a écrit : >Am 2024-04-30 23:11, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: >> Le 30 avril 2024 22:51:19 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger >> a écrit : >>> Am 2024-04-30 22:21, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: >>>> Le 30 avri

Re: pkg upgrade odity

Le 30 avril 2024 23:05:49 GMT+02:00, Tatsuki Makino a écrit : >Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 2024/05/01 05:21: >> Le 30 avril 2024 13:18:41 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger >> a écrit : >>> In my case it complains about missing shared libs for exactly those ports >>

Re: pkg upgrade odity

Le 30 avril 2024 22:51:19 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger a écrit : >Am 2024-04-30 22:21, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: >> Le 30 avril 2024 13:18:41 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger >> a écrit : > >>> Does this sound like "pkg check -B" would help here? >>

Re: pkg upgrade odity

Le 30 avril 2024 13:18:41 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger a écrit : >Am 2024-04-29 17:21, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: >> On Mon 29 Apr 16:41, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> On 29/04/2024 12:49, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> >

Re: pkg upgrade odity

On Tue 30 Apr 12:23, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > > Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 2024/04/30 08:50: > > Le 29 avril 2024 22:33:09 GMT+02:00, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> a > > écrit : > >> > >> My notes from 2024-04-23: > >> > &

Re: pkg upgrade odity

On Tue 30 Apr 12:23, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > > Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 2024/04/30 08:50: > > Le 29 avril 2024 22:33:09 GMT+02:00, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> a > > écrit : > >> > >> My notes from 2024-04-23: > >> > &

Re: pkg upgrade odity

Le 29 avril 2024 22:33:09 GMT+02:00, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> a écrit : >On 29/04/2024 19:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Le 29 avril 2024 19:33:35 GMT+02:00, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> a >> écrit : >>> On 29/04/2024 17:21, Baptiste Da

Re: pkg upgrade odity

Le 29 avril 2024 19:33:35 GMT+02:00, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> a écrit : >On 29/04/2024 17:21, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Mon 29 Apr 16:41, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> On 29/04/2024 12:49, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >

Re: pkg upgrade odity

On Mon 29 Apr 16:41, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 29/04/2024 12:49, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > pkg wants to remove some package on upgrade. I do not understand why... > > ---snip--- > > # pkg upgrade > > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > > Fetching meta.conf: 100%    178 B

Re: pkg upgrade odity

On Mon 29 Apr 12:49, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > pkg wants to remove some package on upgrade. I do not understand why... > ---snip--- > # pkg upgrade > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > Fetching meta.conf: 100%178 B 0.2kB/s00:01 > Fetching data.pkg: 100% 130 KiB 133.5k

Re: pkg-1.21.0: after upgrade 1.20.9_1 -> 1.21.0: pkg core dumps on specific ports

Le 9 avril 2024 18:06:12 GMT+02:00, FreeBSD User a écrit : >Am Tue, 9 Apr 2024 17:10:52 +0200 >Rainer Hurling schrieb: > >> Am 09.04.24 um 09:20 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: >> > On Sat 06 Apr 09:23, Rainer Hurling wrote: >> >> Am 06.04.24 um 09:05

Re: pkg-1.21.0: after upgrade 1.20.9_1 -> 1.21.0: pkg core dumps on specific ports

On Sat 06 Apr 09:23, Rainer Hurling wrote: > Am 06.04.24 um 09:05 schrieb FreeBSD User: > > Hello, > > > > after updating (portmaster and make) ports-mgmt/ports from 1.20.9_1 -> > > 1.21.0 on CURRENT and > > 14-STABLE, I can't update several ports: > > > > www/apache24 > > databases/redis > > >

Re: pkg-1.21.0: after upgrade 1.20.9_1 -> 1.21.0: pkg core dumps on specific ports

On Sat 06 Apr 09:05, FreeBSD User wrote: > Hello, > > after updating (portmaster and make) ports-mgmt/ports from 1.20.9_1 -> 1.21.0 > on CURRENT and > 14-STABLE, I can't update several ports: > > www/apache24 > databases/redis > > pkg core dumps while performing installation. apache24 and redis

Re: poudriere(8) short circuits my ability to build packages

On Thu 04 Apr 00:30, Chris wrote: > I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for poudriere(8). I stopped reading here, because it clearly shows you haven't understand at all what value poudriere(8) is bringing, hint using jail is not it, poudriere leverages jails, but we could do

Re: gmake-4.4.1 has a performance regression: at least the science/nwchem project now builds much slower

On Fri 29 Mar 10:28, Yuri wrote: > GNU Make now handles variable substitutions differently, see the discussion > here: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65533 > This causes it to sometimes fire exponentially more sub-processes than > before. > > Some other ports that use a lot of variable substitutio

Re: Re: Call for help: moving manpages to share/man

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 03:34:38PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Gleb Popov: > > > > Well, now it blocks contributors that don't have a GitHub account > > > from being able to request a pull. :-) > > > > How would you request a pull when using FreeBSD git repo? > > You wouldn't, but commi

Re: git: bb63e82e8c10 - main - bsddialog(1): document the replacement of dialog(1)

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:49:39PM +0900, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:59:09 +0200 > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 12:03:32PM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 09:25:13 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >

Re: git: bb63e82e8c10 - main - bsddialog(1): document the replacement of dialog(1)

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 12:03:32PM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 09:25:13 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > The branch main has been updated by bapt: > > > > URL: > > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=bb63e82e8c109156b31e806

Re: Creating ports with utilisation of bsd.prog.mk

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 03:42:14PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to create two ports for software I have ported to FreeBSD. > > These two ports are classical 4.4BSD software that ship NetBSD and OpenBSD > per default > can could benefit FreeBSD users. > > The first one is

Re: kmod ports and conflicts when upgrading

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:25:40AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > Hi, > > As part of the work to run FreeBSD containers on other operating systems via > Podman, I have written a device driver for the QEMU firmware config > interface. I am currently building this via an overlay port, but aim to

Re: FLAVORS: flavor depending on other flavor, same port

On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 08:33:05AM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > Hello to all, > > I'd like to know if it is possible that one flavor can depend on other > flavor on same port. > > As a practical example, suppose a port that have 3 flavors: client, server > and common. > 'client' and 'server' dep

Re: pkg writing to /

reason the mkdir > /compat/linux failed, > i did as root ‘mkdir /usr/local/compat/linux’, and linux installed ok. > danny > > > > On 6 Mar 2023, at 09:52, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 09:37:32AM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote: > >&

Re: How do I determine the ABI string used by pkg?

On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 11:50:13PM -0800, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > I need to determine the ABI string pkg uses on a given system, and need to > do so when there are no pkgs installed. pkg config ABI pkg config ALTABI > > I've read through libpkg/pkg_elf.c and I can see how it's reading ELF > headers

Re: pkg writing to /

On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 09:37:32AM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote: > Hi, > how can I tell pkg not to write to /? in my case sometimes / > is mounted ro, and so for example pkg update failed, or > / - which is usually- kept as small as possible gets filled up, eg > by /.pkgtemp.compat.x/linu

Re: pkg-static broken static compile

On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 07:26:11PM -0500, grarpamp wrote: > Something broke such that the "pkg-static" binary included in > the "All" package dirs and in the "Latest" meta bootstrap dirs > is dynamic instead of properly static. > Fixed. this was a regression from adding support to static PIE. Th

Re: ports-mgmt/pkg: 1.18.4 excess "already" message when pkg lock

On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 05:04:28PM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2022/09/13 07:51: > > When pkg lock/unlock with pkg-1.18.4, some packages may say "already" > > message. > > # pkg lock pkg llvm13 > > llvm13-13.0.1_3: lock this package? [y/N]: y > > Locking llvm13-13.0.1_3

Re: Splitting pkgmgr and portmgr

October 7, 2022 at 1:38 PM, "Tomoaki AOKI" wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 12:49:23 +0200 > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > It's been a while since the ports management team (portmgr) needed some > > mo

Splitting pkgmgr and portmgr

Hello everyone, It's been a while since the ports management team (portmgr) needed some modernization and updates. To meet today's requirements, we are taking a first step: spliting portmgr and pkgmgr. While portmgr's charter does not change, the part of the responsibility regarding the packages

Re: Recover from a corrupt pkg DB

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:36:52AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I had a crash while building ffmpeg on a new system. The build had not > begun, so I don't think ffmpeg is really an issue. portmaster(8) was > walking the dependency tree when the system panicked and, after a reboot > and full fsck,

Re: ports-mgmt/pkg: pkg query -e %#r condition doesn't match properly

On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 04:17:49PM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Looking at "pkg shell .dump | grep \ deps\ " results, it seems that origin > without @flavor is not unique. > However, ports that use FLAVORS are modified to make the PKGNAME unique. > > So, the following patch is applied and it se

Re: Please commit fix for x11/xcb-proto PR 265022

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 02:43:03PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > There is a bug in x11/xcb-proto, failing the build for Python 3.7. Python > 3.7 is still supported version. Can this fix be committed to main and 2022Q3 > please? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265022 > > K

Re: New categories: both virtual and non virtual

Le 2 juillet 2022 15:56:22 GMT+02:00, Pau Amma a écrit : >On 2022-06-30 14:34, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Non Virtual: >[...] >> - fonts (fonts and related libraries) > >Is that the same as x11-fonts, renamed to include Wayland fonts (if different) >and maybe vty

Re: New categories: both virtual and non virtual

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Robert Clausecker wrote: > While we are at it, may I propose to split some categories off the overly > large > devel category? Here are some ideas: > > - src-mgmt for version control programs, diff tools, and similar > - debuggers for gdb, lldb, strace

New categories: both virtual and non virtual

Hello everyone, with pkg 1.18, it is easier to add new catagories which and reduce the impact in people as we can query all the categories virtual or not. Now that this is done, I would like to add the following new categories. Not that I want to address the current isssue here which is the deskt

Re: pkg: sqlite error while executing UPDATE packages … pkgdb.c:2648: UNIQUE constraint failed: packages.name

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 08:59:52PM +0100, Graham Perrin wrote: > From : > > pkg: sqlite error while executing UPDATE packages SET name='py39-setuptools' > WHERE id=44784 in file pkgdb.c:2648: UNIQUE constraint failed: packages.name > pkg: sqlite error while exec

Re: MATE desktop , compiz does not work properly after disable gconf support

On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 09:37:19PM -0700, Chris wrote: > On 2022-06-15 16:50, Minoru TANABE wrote: > > Hi all. > > I'm using MATE desktop and compiz. For several years, they work fine. > You should be able to get your previous (gnome related) settings via > gsettings (man 1 gsettings for more detai

Re: Some ports tree policy changes

Le 24 avril 2022 11:45:55 GMT+02:00, Rene Ladan a écrit : >Hello, > >portmgr discussed releasing a lot of files in Mk/ to the general public (i.e. >you) a few weeks ago. This is to encourage people to work on this kind of >infrastructure, make it less exclusive to portmgr and perhaps make it f

Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:29:45AM -0800, Chris wrote: > On 2022-01-24 03:00, Daniel Engberg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just wanted to chime in on Alexander's (netchild@) mail and I fully agree. > > Looking at base we already have a lot of contrib and since we need to > > adapt each > > software pro

Re: Modular fetch design proposal: Was: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 03:46:39PM +0100, Jan Bramkamp wrote: > On 24.01.22 09:12, Chris wrote: > > On 2022-01-23 10:19, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I did not really have an opinion on this, since we never used FTP, > > > but I was a bit surprised by the suggestion to use SS

Re: pkgbase checksums

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 03:11:52PM +0100, Rosenke wrote: > > > On 21.01.22 19:49, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > 17 janv. 2022 16:22:31 Rosenke : > > > > > On 17.01.22 16:20, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 04:17:46PM +0100,

Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:10:11PM +, Vincent Hoffman-Kazlauskas wrote: > > > On 24/01/2022 08:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:12:20AM -0800, Chris wrote: > > > On 2022-01-23 10:19, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > > > Hi all, >

Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:12:20AM -0800, Chris wrote: > On 2022-01-23 10:19, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I did not really have an opinion on this, since we never used FTP, > > but I was a bit surprised by the suggestion to use SSH instead. > > > > It never occurred to us that an

Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

22 janv. 2022 08:47:57 Chris : > On 2022-01-21 23:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> 22 janv. 2022 08:25:47 Chris : >> On 2022-01-20 06:25, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> Hello everyone, >>>> We plan to remove the support for fetching packages over ftp for

Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

22 janv. 2022 08:25:47 Chris : > On 2022-01-20 06:25, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> We plan to remove the support for fetching packages over ftp for the next >> releases of pkg (probably 1.18) > Must be a stupid question. But I'll ask an

Re: pkgbase checksums

17 janv. 2022 16:22:31 Rosenke : > > On 17.01.22 16:20, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 04:17:46PM +0100, Rosenke wrote: >>> On 17.01.22 16:12, Rosenke wrote: >>>> On 13.01.22 13:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>>> On Thu

Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:22:27PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 20.01.2022 21:47, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 09:43:38AM -0500, James E Keenan wrote: > >> On 1/20/22 9:25 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> Hello everyone, > >

Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 09:43:38AM -0500, James E Keenan wrote: > On 1/20/22 9:25 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > We plan to remove the support for fetching packages over ftp for the next > > releases of pkg (probably 1.18) if you have a str

[HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

Hello everyone, We plan to remove the support for fetching packages over ftp for the next releases of pkg (probably 1.18) if you have a strong reason to use ftp which cannot be fixed by switching to any other supported protocols like ssh or http, please do share. Best regards, Bapt

Re: pkgbase checksums

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 04:17:46PM +0100, Rosenke wrote: > On 17.01.22 16:12, Rosenke wrote: > > On 13.01.22 13:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:33:55AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > > > > Am 13.01.22 um 10:36 schrieb H

Re: pkgbase checksums

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:33:55AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 13.01.22 um 10:36 schrieb Henrik Rosenke: > > Hello, > > > > what is the correct way to handle pkg checksum mismatches in pkgbase? (pkg > > check -sa) > > For example after installing bash or editing /etc/hosts there are checksum >

Re: pkg alias commands missing after upgrading to 1.17.5

On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 05:11:06AM -0800, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2021-12-03 2:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:28:58AM -0800, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > > > With pkg-1.17.5: > > > > > > # pkg alias > > > ALIAS

Re: pkg alias commands missing after upgrading to 1.17.5

On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:28:58AM -0800, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > After upgrading pkg from 1.17.4 to 1.17.5, all of the command line aliases > appear to have been removed? > > With pkg 1.17.4: > > # pkg alias > ALIASARGUMENTS > all-depends 'query %dn-%dv' > annotations

Re: pkg audit: security problems only

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:31:37AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Is there an option to limit pkg audit to report security problems only? > > Right now the corresponding periodic script reports a lot of (what I > consider to be) noise every night. It's about deprecated packages, mostly > dependi

Re: What to do with the "Created by" header comments?

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:48:53PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 09/11/21 16:33, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: > > Hi Mel, > > > > IIRC the "# Created by: ..." line was added to give credits to the original > > creator of the port. > > I'm not sure if this is still a thing. > > > > As far as I rememb

Re: poudriere's check_leftovers and update-mime-database

On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 11:18:23AM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 11/1/2021 8:32 AM, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Recently I've encountered an issue (a race condition?) with poudriere and a > > port I maintain with MIME database. > > > > The bulk build in poudriere, with the -t f

Re: Bash Static broken with new ncurses update on current

On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 11:46:45AM -0700, Manfred Antar (KN6KBS) wrote: > After update to current world on 10/5/2021 bash static is broken: > > cc -L./builtins -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L./lib/glob -L./lib/tilde > -L./lib/sh -L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector-strong -fuse-ld=bfd -sta

Re: Remove a port without removing files

On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 07:03:30PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > As the subject says, I need to remove a port so pkg etc does not care about > it, but keeping all the ports files intact. > > Thanks, > Per > Install it with pkg, then echo 'delete from packages where name="mypkgname";' | pk

Re: Why no flavor_USES helper?

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 06:33:29AM -0700, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2021-09-06 1:16, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 10:39:29AM -0700, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > > > The flavors helpers like flavor_RUN_DEPENDS are super useful, but I need > > > to > &

Re: Why no flavor_USES helper?

On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 10:39:29AM -0700, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > The flavors helpers like flavor_RUN_DEPENDS are super useful, but I need to > modify USES based on flavor, and find that there is no helper for it. That > is, I'd like to be able to do this: > > flavor1_USES= alice > flavor2_USES= bob

Re: Missing file in ports-mgmt/pkg

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 09:25:26AM -0400, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > I keep getting the following error when creating a package from installed. > > pkg: lstat(/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg): No such file or directory > > I fixed this by removing "@dir lib/compat/pkg" from pkg-plist. Was that the > corre

Re: Fetching pkg-1.17.1 fails due to size mismatch

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:31:37PM +0200, Philipp Ost wrote: > Fetching pkg-1.17.1 fails because of a size mismatch: > Please update your ports tree, this happened for 17min. Sorry about it Best regards, Bapt

Re: Proposal: Include the Application Name in Ports and Packages

On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 12:55:05PM +0200, probono wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 1:51 AM Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Simply add a new annotation to the package with the Application Name(s) > > when it > > is relevant. I add plural because some ports do provide multiple A

Re: Proposal: Include the Application Name in Ports and Packages

On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 08:35:12PM +, probono wrote: > Hello, > > This is a proposal to include the Application Name in Ports and Packages. > Happy to hear your thoughts on this. > > Kind regards, > probono > > > Terminology > --- > > Application Port: A port that contains a graphi