Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
> On Sep 24, 2024, at 20:30, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
>
>> The upstream being EOL’d doesn’t, IMO, affect the support we have in ports.
>> Unless we’re EOL’ing the port, then we should fix the problem in our
>> script that we install with the port.
>>
>
> Then you should submit bug report to Fre
From: Chris Ross
Subject: Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:45:17 -0400
> The upstream being EOL’d doesn’t, IMO, affect the support we have in ports.
> Unless we’re EOL’ing the port, then we should fix the problem in our
> script that we install with the port.
>
> - C
Kea is quite reasonable to set up quickly.
Cheers,
Zach
El mar, 24 de sept de 2024, 21:12, Tatsuki Makino <
tatsuki_mak...@hotmail.com> escribió:
> Hello.
>
> On 2024/09/24 20:56, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> > you are aware, that dhcpd is EOL since end of 2022:
> > https://www.isc.org/dhcp/
> >
>
Hello.
On 2024/09/24 20:56, Matthias Fechner wrote:
you are aware, that dhcpd is EOL since end of 2022:
https://www.isc.org/dhcp/
and was replaced by kea?
Not sure if it makes sense to put much effort into it.
I was just trying to set it up there, so it interested me.
net/kea is the port on
> On Sep 24, 2024, at 07:56, Matthias Fechner wrote:
>
> you are aware, that dhcpd is EOL since end of 2022:
> https://www.isc.org/dhcp/
>
> and was replaced by kea?
>
> Not sure if it makes sense to put much effort into it.
The upstream being EOL’d doesn’t, IMO, affect the support we have
Am 24.09.2024 um 13:26 schrieb Chris Ross:
On Sep 24, 2024, at 03:11, Helge Oldach wrote:
Chris Ross wrote on Tue, 24 Sep 2024 04:59:39 +0200 (CEST):
I have in /etc/rc.conf:
dhcpd_flags="-4 -q
This one perhaps?
Bah. That was a cut-n-paste and then Mail changed it. I have
000 6
On Tuesday, September 24th, 2024 at 13:22, Lorenzo Salvadore
wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 17th, 2024 at 18:43, Mark Millard mark...@yahoo.com
> wrote:
>
> > For example,
> >
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg-fallout/2024-September/652126.html
> >
> > reports:
> >
>
On Tuesday, September 17th, 2024 at 18:43, Mark Millard
wrote:
>
>
> For example,
>
> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg-fallout/2024-September/652126.html
>
> reports:
>
> ---Begin OPTIONS List---
> > You must select one and only one option from the BOOTSTRAP single
>
> ==
> On Sep 24, 2024, at 03:38, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> As seen from the output of set -x, I think it has been trimmed too much.
>
> https: //cgit.freebsd.org
> /ports/tree/net/isc-dhcp44-server/files/isc-dhcpd.in#n505
>
> Is there a workaround?
>
> dhcpd_flags="-q -4"
> or
> dh
> On Sep 24, 2024, at 03:11, Helge Oldach wrote:
>
> Chris Ross wrote on Tue, 24 Sep 2024 04:59:39 +0200 (CEST):
>> I have in /etc/rc.conf:
>>
>> dhcpd_flags="-4 -q
>
> This one perhaps?
Bah. That was a cut-n-paste and then Mail changed it. I have
000 686470635f646c6
Hello.
# This is also a test for sending email :)
As seen from the output of set -x, I think it has been trimmed too much.
https: //cgit.freebsd.org
/ports/tree/net/isc-dhcp44-server/files/isc-dhcpd.in#n505
Is there a workaround?
dhcpd_flags="-q -4"
or
dhcpd_flags="-4 -q "
Regards.
12 matches
Mail list logo
