Re: mail bounces

2024-01-25 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2024-01-26 08:51:32 (+0800), Tom Rushworth wrote: Something's eating the first '.' in the envelope address on my emails to Cy Schubert, but NOT eating them when I send to the ports list. I think I've probably annoyed the ports list enough for today with this weird non-ports problem, so I'

Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date

2024-01-25 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po

Re: sysutils/nut maintainer mail rejection

2024-01-25 Thread Cy Schubert
In message , Tom Rushworth writes: > --94a37c060fcf18e8 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Hi Cy, > > On 2024-01-25 17:07, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message > > om> > > , Tom Rushworth writes: > [snip] > >> > >> Which port should I use - sysutils/nut or sysutils/nut-devel

Re: sysutils/nut maintainer mail rejection

2024-01-25 Thread Tom Rushworth
Hi Cy, On 2024-01-25 17:07, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message om> > , Tom Rushworth writes: [snip] >> >> Which port should I use - sysutils/nut or sysutils/nut-devel ? So far >> the only changes needed are to drivers/Makefile.am and the actual new >> driver source. > > I won't accept a patch for a

Re: sysutils/nut maintainer mail rejection

2024-01-25 Thread Cy Schubert
In message , Tom Rushworth writes: > Sorry for the noise folks, I'll keep this brief. My original ports > question is at the bottom. > > On 2024-01-25 15:37, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message om> > > The gmail address is the one I'm using to send to this list, and it > seems to work there. > I d

mail bounces

2024-01-25 Thread Tom Rushworth
Something's eating the first '.' in the envelope address on my emails to Cy Schubert, but NOT eating them when I send to the ports list. I think I've probably annoyed the ports list enough for today with this weird non-ports problem, so I'll stop now. Again, sorry for the noise.

Re: sysutils/nut maintainer mail rejection

2024-01-25 Thread Tom Rushworth
Sorry for the noise folks, I'll keep this brief. My original ports question is at the bottom. On 2024-01-25 15:37, Cy Schubert wrote: In message [snip] Testing email from gmail.com directly to my infrastructure and throughmx2.freebsd.org work. There may be something in your subject line or b

Re: sysutils/nut maintainer mail rejection

2024-01-25 Thread Cy Schubert
In message , Tom Rushworth writes: > --afe054060fccb0e8 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > I've been trying to send email to the sysutils/nut port maintainer > (cy@FreeBSD) but the emails are bouncing at the very last stage with the > following type of message: > > : host

sysutils/nut maintainer mail rejection

2024-01-25 Thread Tom Rushworth
I've been trying to send email to the sysutils/nut port maintainer (cy@FreeBSD) but the emails are bouncing at the very last stage with the following type of message: : host .com[XX] said: 554 5.7.1 : Sender address rejected: Rejected (in reply to RCPT TO command) (with

Re: This is going to break port building without poudriere! (was: Subpackage explanations)

2024-01-25 Thread Luca Pizzamiglio
Hi Stefan, I did reply to your first email, but not to your second one. I preferred (in agreement with portmgr@) to open the discussion with everyone, instead of keeping it just between you and me. As you can read in the email you have linked, I didn't ignore your comments. This implementation w

Re: [security/openiked-portable] Committer needed for release update

2024-01-25 Thread David Marec
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:33:01AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi, > > * https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275808 > > > > Can a committer take a look at it ? > > Done. Thanks ! -- David Marec https://wiki.fug-fr.org/doku.php?id=start

Re: This is going to break port building without poudriere!

2024-01-25 Thread George Mitchell
On 1/25/24 08:18, Stefan Esser wrote: Am 24.01.24 um 10:28 schrieb Luca Pizzamiglio: Hi porters! At the beginning of January, we merged the support to subpackages in the framework. Subpackage is the feature to create multiple packages from one build of one port. In other words, now it's possi

This is going to break port building without poudriere! (was: Subpackage explanations)

2024-01-25 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 24.01.24 um 10:28 schrieb Luca Pizzamiglio: Hi porters! At the beginning of January, we merged the support to subpackages in the framework. Subpackage is the feature to create multiple packages from one build of one port. In other words, now it's possible to group files into multiple packag

Re: Subpackage explanations

2024-01-25 Thread Jan Beich
Luca Pizzamiglio writes: > The first use case we want to get rid of is master/slave ports when slave > ports could be built with the master port. Could doesn't necessarily mean should. For example, merging gimp-jxl-plugin back into libjxl would increase build time and risk of "missing packages"

Re: graphics/mesa-libs build broken

2024-01-25 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:05:11 +0100 Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:59:33 +0300 > "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > After 2080c2eddaca4fa188668ae9fe8d76e0461378c3 I'm unable to build > > graphics/mesa-libs because host I'm using doesn't support kcmp(2), it i

Re: graphics/mesa-libs build broken

2024-01-25 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:59:33 +0300 "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote: > Hi, > > After 2080c2eddaca4fa188668ae9fe8d76e0461378c3 I'm unable to build > graphics/mesa-libs because host I'm using doesn't support kcmp(2), it is > FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #24 main-n265517-37236ab7e4e8-dirty > It seems that _suppo

graphics/mesa-libs build broken

2024-01-25 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
Hi, After 2080c2eddaca4fa188668ae9fe8d76e0461378c3 I'm unable to build graphics/mesa-libs because host I'm using doesn't support kcmp(2), it is FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #24 main-n265517-37236ab7e4e8-dirty It seems that _supported_ X.Y-RELEASE doens't have it too and we should have if in Makefile.comm

Re: Subpackage explanations

2024-01-25 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 24/01/2024 10:28, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: Hi porters! At the beginning of January, we merged the support to subpackages in the framework. Subpackage is the feature to create multiple packages from one build of one port. In other words, now it's possible to group files into multiple package