Hi,
Ever since textproc/libxml2 was updated 2.11.6, I've started seeing
segfaults with itstool when I'm running builds for various ports; in
particular archivers/engrampa, graphics/eom and misc/mate-user-guide.
If I introduce MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes, I can get a successful build for
some of the
On 2024-01-21 08:44, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am 21.01.24 um 11:19 schrieb Gleb Popov:
Ahoy there fellow porters!
portmgr@ is currently working on switching the directory into which
man pages are installed from "${PREFIX}/man" to "${PREFIX}/share/man".
It is quite a tedious process, as you might i
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 1:21 AM Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> One commit per port or squashed?
If we're talking about a pull request - I don't mind. But in the case
of a patch without git format-patch headers I will apply it as a
single commit, because I don't have time to go through every port
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
Gleb Popov:
> I've created a branch [1] in my own fork that switches mandir for the
> autotools build system and am inviting everyone to collaborate on
> that, until all the fallout is fixed. I'm asking port maintainers to
> check if they have ports with the "GNU_CONFIGURE=yes" knob, as these
> ar
Hi!
> There is a new version released for ISA-L
> (https://github.com/intel/isa-l/releases/tag/v2.31.0).
> Could this port be updated?
It fails to build:
https://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/isa-l-140.txt
So if you can provide a patch so that the port builds, it can be
updated. Please submit th
Hello,
There is a new version released for ISA-L
(https://github.com/intel/isa-l/releases/tag/v2.31.0).
Could this port be updated?
Thanks,
Pablo
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:47 AM Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
>
>> The ports I'm interested in should have GNU_CONFIGURE=yes kno
>
>
> Just a doubt:
>
> For ports like:
> GNU_CONFIGURE= yes
> PLIST_FILES= man/man1/portname.1.gz
>
> Should we wait for Mk changes or use GNU_CONFIGURE_MANPREFIX= ${PREFIX}
> The ports I'm interested in should have GNU_CONFIGURE=yes kno
Just a doubt:
For ports like:
GNU_CONFIGURE= yes
PLIST_FILES= man/man1/portname.1.gz
Should we wait for Mk changes or use GNU_CONFIGURE_MANPREFIX=
${PREFIX}/share now?
Thanks,
--
Nuno Teixeira
FreeBSD Committer (ports)
