On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 09:53:47PM -0500, Charlie Li wrote:
> Lexi Winter wrote:
> > Moin Rahman:
> > > By default this will not be built in that case. If you want to build
> > > for python 3.10 you have to add USE_PYTHON=allflavors
> >
> > thanks (again). so for a normal port, is there any guida
Hello.
git format-patch is attached.
Gleb Popov wrote on 2024/01/21 19:19:
> Ahoy there fellow porters!
> Moin kindly prepared a list of
> affected ports along with their maintainers (thanks Moin!) [2]
> [2] http://arrowd.name/manprefix-fail.maintainer.txt
I even sent this to the mailing list
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
Lexi Winter wrote:
Moin Rahman:
By default this will not be built in that case. If you want to build
for python 3.10 you have to add USE_PYTHON=allflavors
thanks (again). so for a normal port, is there any guidance on whether
i should do this or not? is there a policy on this?
this is a nor
> On Jan 21, 2024, at 11:46 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> Gleb Popov:
>
>> portmgr@ is currently working on switching the directory into which
>> man pages are installed from "${PREFIX}/man" to "${PREFIX}/share/man".
>>
>> I've created a branch [1] in my own fork that switches mandir fo
Gleb Popov:
> portmgr@ is currently working on switching the directory into which
> man pages are installed from "${PREFIX}/man" to "${PREFIX}/share/man".
>
> I've created a branch [1] in my own fork that switches mandir for the
> autotools build system and am inviting everyone to collaborate on
> On Jan 21, 2024, at 9:15 PM, Lexi Winter wrote:
>
> Moin Rahman:
>> By default this will not be built in that case. If you want to build
>> for python 3.10 you have to add USE_PYTHON=allflavors
>
> thanks (again). so for a normal port, is there any guidance on whether
> i should do this or
Moin Rahman:
> By default this will not be built in that case. If you want to build
> for python 3.10 you have to add USE_PYTHON=allflavors
thanks (again). so for a normal port, is there any guidance on whether
i should do this or not? is there a policy on this?
this is a normal (desktop) appli
> On Jan 21, 2024, at 8:55 PM, Lexi Winter wrote:
>
> Moin Rahman:
>> On Jan 21, 2024, at 8:26 PM, Lexi Winter wrote:
>>> i'm trying to port an application that requires Python 3.10+ or later,
>>> while the default Python is still 3.9.
>>
>> .if ${PYTHON_REL} < 31000
>> IGNORE= Does not suppo
Moin Rahman:
>On Jan 21, 2024, at 8:26 PM, Lexi Winter wrote:
> > i'm trying to port an application that requires Python 3.10+ or later,
> > while the default Python is still 3.9.
>
> .if ${PYTHON_REL} < 31000
> IGNORE= Does not support python 3.9 or earler
> .endif
thanks Moin,
if i coul
> On Jan 21, 2024, at 8:26 PM, Lexi Winter wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> i'm trying to port an application that requires Python 3.10+ or later,
> while the default Python is still 3.9.
>
> this is my Makefile:
> https://git.sr.ht/~lw/freebsd-ports/tree/sublime-music/item/audio/py-sublime-music/Make
hi all,
i'm trying to port an application that requires Python 3.10+ or later,
while the default Python is still 3.9.
this is my Makefile:
https://git.sr.ht/~lw/freebsd-ports/tree/sublime-music/item/audio/py-sublime-music/Makefile
running poudriere testport initially produces several messages l
On 21/01/24 18:13, Rodrigo Osorio wrote:
On 21/01/24 17:44, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am 21.01.24 um 11:19 schrieb Gleb Popov:
Ahoy there fellow porters!
portmgr@ is currently working on switching the directory into which
man pages are installed from "${PREFIX}/man" to "${PREFIX}/share/man".
It is
On 21/01/24 17:44, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am 21.01.24 um 11:19 schrieb Gleb Popov:
Ahoy there fellow porters!
portmgr@ is currently working on switching the directory into which
man pages are installed from "${PREFIX}/man" to "${PREFIX}/share/man".
It is quite a tedious process, as you might ima
Am 21.01.24 um 17:53 schrieb Gleb Popov:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 7:45 PM Rainer Hurling wrote:
All three ports do not generate any man pages. So I don't understand why
they are included in the list. Or is it different if autotools is used?
Thanks in advance for any clarification.
Moin gener
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 7:45 PM Rainer Hurling wrote:
>
> All three ports do not generate any man pages. So I don't understand why
> they are included in the list. Or is it different if autotools is used?
>
> Thanks in advance for any clarification.
Moin generated this list while working on the s
Am 21.01.24 um 11:19 schrieb Gleb Popov:
Ahoy there fellow porters!
portmgr@ is currently working on switching the directory into which
man pages are installed from "${PREFIX}/man" to "${PREFIX}/share/man".
It is quite a tedious process, as you might imagine. More than that,
changing the default
Ahoy there fellow porters!
portmgr@ is currently working on switching the directory into which
man pages are installed from "${PREFIX}/man" to "${PREFIX}/share/man".
It is quite a tedious process, as you might imagine. More than that,
changing the default for a given build system instantly breaks
18 matches
Mail list logo
