On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:53 AM Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> Something looks really messed up on the beefy16 package builder for 13.1amd64.
The main culprit is pkg 1.20:
https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/2155
https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/2156
Am 10.07.23 um 08:08 schrieb Mark Millard:
On Jul 9, 2023, at 22:52, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am 10.07.23 um 06:53 schrieb Mark Millard:
Konstantin Belousov wrote on
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 01:18:05 UTC :
On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:52:50PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Something looks really mes
On Jul 9, 2023, at 22:52, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> Am 10.07.23 um 06:53 schrieb Mark Millard:
>> Konstantin Belousov wrote on
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 01:18:05 UTC :
>>> On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:52:50PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Something looks really messed up on the beefy16 package bu
Am 10.07.23 um 06:53 schrieb Mark Millard:
Konstantin Belousov wrote on
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 01:18:05 UTC :
On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:52:50PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Something looks really messed up on the beefy16 package builder for
13.1amd64.
It is building about 9500 packages and s
Kevin Oberman wrote on 2023/07/10 14:01:
> I have been monitoring the builds of amd64 builds for at least two years
> and this is way outside of the norm. It continues to build packages at a
> rate of 10 per hour which would still mean that the build will not complete
> until late August. I guess
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 7:14 PM Tatsuki Makino
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Kevin Oberman wrote on 2023/07/10 09:52:
> > only completed 459 packages, a rate of 10 packages/hour and, if it
> > continues at this rate, will not complete for about 40 days. Nt sure if
>
> The numbers in that area are meaningles
Konstantin Belousov wrote on
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 01:18:05 UTC :
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:52:50PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Something looks really messed up on the beefy16 package builder for
> > 13.1amd64.
> >
> > It is building about 9500 packages and started almost two days ago. I
Hello.
Kevin Oberman wrote on 2023/07/10 09:52:
> only completed 459 packages, a rate of 10 packages/hour and, if it
> continues at this rate, will not complete for about 40 days. Nt sure if
The numbers in that area are meaningless :)
For example, the following two
poudriere bulk -j ... -C devel
On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:52:50PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Something looks really messed up on the beefy16 package builder for
> 13.1amd64.
>
> It is building about 9500 packages and started almost two days ago. It has
> only completed 459 packages, a rate of 10 packages/hour and, if it
> co
Something looks really messed up on the beefy16 package builder for
13.1amd64.
It is building about 9500 packages and started almost two days ago. It has
only completed 459 packages, a rate of 10 packages/hour and, if it
continues at this rate, will not complete for about 40 days. Nt sure if
this
Moin-moin!
On 09.07.2023 11:23, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
On 8 Jul 2023, at 20:01, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Home workstation in preparation for 12- EOL.
After OS update 12.4 -> 13.2 STABLE and reinstalling tons of ports, the only
remaining problem is libreoffice.
stable/13-cbca92986
gmake
Hi!
> On 8 Jul 2023, at 20:01, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> >
> > Home workstation in preparation for 12- EOL.
> >
> > After OS update 12.4 -> 13.2 STABLE and reinstalling tons of ports, the
> > only remaining problem is libreoffice.
> >
> > stable/13-cbca92986
> >
> > gmake[2]: *** [Makefile
12 matches
Mail list logo
