Re: security/clamav: /var/run on TMPFS renders the port broken by design

Am Sun, 28 Aug 2022 06:11:20 -0700 Cy Schubert schrieb: > In message <20220828130107.1a76d54a.gre...@freebsd.org>, Michael Gmelin > writes: > > > > > > > > On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 03:21:24 -0700 > > Cy Schubert wrote: > > > > > In message <16b4-76a1-4e46-b7c3-60492d379...@freebsd.org>, > > >

Re: New Port: Security/liblurch & Security/Pidgin-lurch

Hi, Login to https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/click Report an update or defect to a port upload a diff or archive of the port file. And wait for a committer to pick it up. Regards, Ronald Van: "Michael A. Oshin" Datum: 29 augustus 2022 04:11 Aan: freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re

Re: New Port: Security/liblurch & Security/Pidgin-lurch

Good Morning Folks, I now have lurch built over Poudriere; please see https://paste.mozilla.org/EcEH1jPw. I enabled portlint and developer_mode. How do I push this to freshports? Is there anything else to do? On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 at 21:33, Felix Palmen wrote: > * Michael A. Oshin [20220827 20:

Re: nginx-full version numbering question

> On 29. Aug 2022, at 00:33, Pete Wright wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 11:05:24PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> >> On 28. Aug 2022, at 19:23, Pete Wright wrote: >>> >>>  hey there - i had a question about an apparent version numbering issue >>> with the nginx-full port: >>>

Re: nginx-full version numbering question

On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 11:05:24PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > On 28. Aug 2022, at 19:23, Pete Wright wrote: > > > >  hey there - i had a question about an apparent version numbering issue > > with the nginx-full port: > > https://www.freshports.org/www/nginx-full/ > > > > on April

Re: nginx-full version numbering question

> On 28. Aug 2022, at 23:05, Michael Gmelin wrote: > >  > > >>> On 28. Aug 2022, at 19:23, Pete Wright wrote: >>> >>  hey there - i had a question about an apparent version numbering issue >> with the nginx-full port: >> https://www.freshports.org/www/nginx-full/ >> >> on April 10th the

Re: nginx-full version numbering question

> On 28. Aug 2022, at 19:23, Pete Wright wrote: > >  hey there - i had a question about an apparent version numbering issue with > the nginx-full port: > https://www.freshports.org/www/nginx-full/ > > on April 10th the version number is: 1.20.2_9,2 > then on the next update (may 31) the vers

Re: nginx-full version numbering question

Hello. I'm not sure :), but we can use pkg version -t to find out how big or small the port version is. pkg version -t 1.20.2_9,2 1.22.0_10,2 is <. www/nginx-full is the sl@ve port of the m@ster port www/nginx. So, changes in the distfile version will automatically follow. But then the sl@ve po

nginx-full version numbering question

hey there - i had a question about an apparent version numbering issue with the nginx-full port: https://www.freshports.org/www/nginx-full/ on April 10th the version number is:1.20.2_9,2 then on the next update (may 31) the version number seems to go backwards: 1.22.0_10,2 i was curious if th

Re: security/clamav: /ar/run on TMPFS renders the port broken by design

In message <20220828130107.1a76d54a.gre...@freebsd.org>, Michael Gmelin writes: > > > > On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 03:21:24 -0700 > Cy Schubert wrote: > > > In message <16b4-76a1-4e46-b7c3-60492d379...@freebsd.org>, > > Michael Gmelin w > > rites: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 28. Aug 2022, at 10

Re: security/clamav: /ar/run on TMPFS renders the port broken by design

On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 03:21:24 -0700 Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <16b4-76a1-4e46-b7c3-60492d379...@freebsd.org>, > Michael Gmelin w > rites: > > > > > > > > > On 28. Aug 2022, at 10:42, free...@oldach.net wrote: > > >=20 > > > =EF=BB=BFCy Schubert wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 17:26:38 +0

Re: security/clamav: /ar/run on TMPFS renders the port broken by design

In message <16b4-76a1-4e46-b7c3-60492d379...@freebsd.org>, Michael Gmelin w rites: > > > > > On 28. Aug 2022, at 10:42, free...@oldach.net wrote: > >=20 > > =EF=BB=BFCy Schubert wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 17:26:38 +0200 (CEST): > >> As stated before in this thread, replacing /var/run with tmpf

Re: security/clamav: /ar/run on TMPFS renders the port broken by design

In message <202208280842.27s8gdxn055...@nuc.oldach.net>, Helge Oldach writes: > Cy Schubert wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 17:26:38 +0200 (CEST): > > As stated before in this thread, replacing /var/run with tmpfs is not a > > supported configuration. > > Not supported? What is the purpose of /etc/rc.d/

Re: security/clamav: /ar/run on TMPFS renders the port broken by design

> On 28. Aug 2022, at 10:42, free...@oldach.net wrote: > > Cy Schubert wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 17:26:38 +0200 (CEST): >> As stated before in this thread, replacing /var/run with tmpfs is not a >> supported configuration. > > Not supported? What is the purpose of /etc/rc.d/var then? That cre