Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
In message <20220827082638.57901a72@slippy>, Cy Schubert writes:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:38:44 +0200
> Juraj Lutter wrote:
>
> > > On 27 Aug 2022, at 15:27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > =20
> > >> On 27. Aug 2022, at 15:18, free...@oldach.net wrote:
> > >>=20
> > >> =EF=BB=BFMi
On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:38:44 +0200
Juraj Lutter wrote:
> > On 27 Aug 2022, at 15:27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 27. Aug 2022, at 15:18, free...@oldach.net wrote:
> >>
> >> Michael Gmelin wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:02:04 +0200 (CEST):
> >>> (you're removing /var/run, whi
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> I like the idea of having something like tmpfiles.d, it would also help port
> maintainers (could also be done as a port).
I use tmpfs for /var/run and already have such a script for this very reason
(although not clamav)
I would have thought each port startup script sh
> On 27 Aug 2022, at 15:27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 27. Aug 2022, at 15:18, free...@oldach.net wrote:
>>
>> Michael Gmelin wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:02:04 +0200 (CEST):
>>> (you're removing /var/run, which shouldn't be removed
>>
>> Not quite. It's actually not uncommon to boo
* Michael A. Oshin [20220827 20:32]:
>Maybe, pidgin-lurch & liblurch go to net-im
> while libomemo etc remain in the security category.
They make sense in both categories. Maybe you could argue net-im is the
better choice for the primary category becau
> On 27. Aug 2022, at 15:18, free...@oldach.net wrote:
>
> Michael Gmelin wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:02:04 +0200 (CEST):
>> (you're removing /var/run, which shouldn't be removed
>
> Not quite. It's actually not uncommon to boot with an empty /var. Please see
> /etc/rc.d/var and related.
T
> On 27. Aug 2022, at 12:54, FreeBSD User wrote:
>
> Am Sat, 27 Aug 2022 11:21:40 +0200
> Michael Gmelin schrieb:
>
On 27. Aug 2022, at 08:31, FreeBSD User wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm referencing to Bug 259699 [2] and Bug 259585 [1].
>>>
>>> Port security/clamav is without d
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022, 17:31 Felix Palmen wrote:
> * Michael A. Oshin [20220827 17:26]:
> > Thanks everyone. I missed those reply because I subscribed to a daily
> > digest.
>
> I took you on CC now. Please also consider my other answers I added to
> the list only.
> On 27. Aug 2022, at 08:30, FreeBSD User wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm referencing to Bug 259699 [2] and Bug 259585 [1].
>
> Port security/clamav is without doubt for many of FreeBSD users an important
> piece of security
> software so I assume a widespread usage.
>
> It is also a not uncommon u
Am Sat, 27 Aug 2022 11:21:40 +0200
Michael Gmelin schrieb:
> > On 27. Aug 2022, at 08:31, FreeBSD User wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm referencing to Bug 259699 [2] and Bug 259585 [1].
> >
> > Port security/clamav is without doubt for many of FreeBSD users an
> > important piece of
> > se
This another example of a port that suffers from tmpfiles.d absence in FreeBSD.
We need a service in the base system that will create some directories
based on configuration files during system start.
* Michael A. Oshin [20220827 17:26]:
> I shall work on them. I don't know what else to use if not do-install. Most
> Makefiles had post-install, which emitted pkg-static dir. access error when
> used here.
do-install is for completely overriding the installation (to the
STAGEDIR
* Michael A. Oshin [20220827 17:26]:
> Thanks everyone. I missed those reply because I subscribed to a daily
> digest.
I took you on CC now. Please also consider my other answers I added to
the list only.
> I shall drop the use GH then, @Cy had earlier recommended it.
To clarify: I
Thanks everyone. I missed those reply because I subscribed to a daily
digest.
I shall work on them. I don't know what else to use if not do-install. Most
Makefiles had post-install, which emitted pkg-static dir. access error when
used here.
The lib, before being ported, was also installing into t
> On 27. Aug 2022, at 08:31, FreeBSD User wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm referencing to Bug 259699 [2] and Bug 259585 [1].
>
> Port security/clamav is without doubt for many of FreeBSD users an important
> piece of security
> software so I assume a widespread usage.
>
> It is also a not uncomm
* Felix Palmen [20220827 10:20]:
> Just to give you an idea how it all could be fixed, have a look at the
> last three commits here:
> <https://github.com/Zirias/zfbsd-ports/commits/lurch>
I uploaded these commits for you to pull if you want, just execute the
following in your por
* Michael A. Oshin [20220827 13:20]:
> See the makefile at
> https://github.com/micadeyeye/freebsd-ports/blob/master/security/liblurch/Makefile
First of all, this port had *lots* of perfectly avoidable problems,
like, nonsensical pkg-plist, many formatting/styling issues, missing
depend
18 matches
Mail list logo
