On 2021-Jun-12, at 17:53, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2021-Jun-12, at 10:57, bob prohaska wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote:
???In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it se
On 2021-Jun-12, at 10:57, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote:
>>>
>>> ???In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to
>>> work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimisti
On 6/12/21 4:16 PM, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:26:16PM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote:
>> On 6/12/21 10:57 AM, bob prohaska wrote:
>>>
>>> Trying it now, hoping to see parallel core use.
>>
>> You won't. Setting PARALLEL_JOBS=1 means exactly one Poudriere worker
>> will run, and
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:26:16PM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote:
> On 6/12/21 10:57 AM, bob prohaska wrote:
> >
> > Trying it now, hoping to see parallel core use.
>
> You won't. Setting PARALLEL_JOBS=1 means exactly one Poudriere worker
> will run, and that make will not build in parallel. You ha
On 6/12/21 10:57 AM, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote:
>>>
>>> ???In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to
>>> work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 02:54:33PM -0600, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> Hi!
> Wondering if you considered https://github.com/FWGS/xash3d-fwgs instead of
> dead xash3d?
Hi there,
Yes, FWGS is the upstream project (not the obsolete xash3d). Those
guys have done some really good work on tweaking the SDK's
> On 12. Jun 2021, at 20:08, bob prohaska wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 10:45:13AM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote:
>>> On 6/12/21 10:29 AM, bob prohaska wrote:
>>> In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to
>>> work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB P
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 10:45:13AM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote:
> On 6/12/21 10:29 AM, bob prohaska wrote:
> > In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to
> > work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3.
> >
> (snip)
> You might want to consider modifying you
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
>
> > On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote:
> >
> > ???In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to
> > work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3.
> >
> > Can poudriere be configu
On 6/12/21 10:29 AM, bob prohaska wrote:
> In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to
> work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3.
>
(snip)
You might want to consider modifying your USE_TMPFS setting in
poudriere.conf if you are constrained by memory. The
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:34:22PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 12.06.21 um 19:29 schrieb bob prohaska:
> > In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to
> > work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3.
> >
> > Can poudriere be configured to tackle package
> On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote:
>
> In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to
> work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3.
>
> Can poudriere be configured to tackle packages one at a time?
Yes, see poudriere.conf:
# parallel build
Am 12.06.21 um 19:29 schrieb bob prohaska:
> In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to
> work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3.
>
> Can poudriere be configured to tackle packages one at a time?
Sure, the easiest to try is poudriere bulk -J1 ... (capit
In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to
work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3.
Can poudriere be configured to tackle packages one at a time?
For example, it started to build both sqlite8 and llvm10 at the
same time. I know the setup in this example
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
16 matches
Mail list logo