On 23/01/13 11:21 AM, Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे wrote:
> The reaction seems like "You asked for it, you are getting it. Don't blame
> us for it." ("it" indicates spam)
In a way, yes it seems to be like that. People were asking for freedom. they
get it now. Freedom comes with responsibilities. (Wit
On 23/01/13 12:13 PM, Darth Chatri wrote:
> On 23 January 2013 01:24, Sudhanwa Jogalekar wrote:
>> 1. All the users moderation flag (that is currently set) to be
>> removed.
> +1
>
>> Any new member joining the list will not get a moderation
>> flag set.
> -1. We should moderate the first couple
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:41 PM, शंतनू wrote:
>
> On 23/01/13 11:21 AM, Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे wrote:
> > The reaction seems like "You asked for it, you are getting it. Don't
> blame
> > us for it." ("it" indicates spam)
>
> In a way, yes it seems to be like that. People were asking for freedom.
On Saturday 26 Jan 2013 11:12:42 AM Arun Khan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Koustubh Sinkar wrote:
In the true sense of things, Self Moderation of any this is the best
moderation of anything... now that can not work for all, because all are not
born equal, so there has to be a way
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 12:48 +0530, Navin Kabra wrote:
> Sudhanwa Jogalekar writes:
>
> > Any new member joining the list will not get a moderation
> > flag set.
>
> -1. This does not make sense. New users should have moderation flag set
> until the first post gets approved or 1st month or somet
On 27 January 2013 20:48, शंतनू wrote:
>
>
> Earlier, almost everyone seemed to be against moderation. Why the moderators
> should be given the task to keep track of
> members mail count. Can you (anyone) volunteer do it on the list itself?
Isn't that something that mailman automates? If not, th
