Re: [PLUG] Mailing list issues - Quick vote

2013-01-09 Thread Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Arun Khan wrote: > Just two days ago, my reply to an OP on security certification was > trapped by a "Suspicious Header" filter. It took close to 42 hours to > get moderator approval. This is after so much discussion on opening > up this mailing list. I have be

Re: [PLUG] Mailing list issues - Quick vote

2013-01-09 Thread steve
On Saturday 05 January 2013 09:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote: The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on what is expected. A quick vote should help. A: Open up the list completely, no moderation B: Remove restrictive moderation, keep basic moderation in place C: Let it

Re: [PLUG] Mailing list issues - Quick vote

2013-01-09 Thread म . हा . सा . ग . र
On Wednesday 09 Jan 2013 6:25:28 PM steve wrote: > On Saturday 05 January 2013 09:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote: > > The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on > > what is expected. A quick vote should help. > > > > A: Open up the list completely, no moderation > > B: Rem

Re: [PLUG] Mailing list issues - Quick vote

2013-01-09 Thread ColVIN
A: +1   Lets hope quick(..rather any) response from admin/moderators. Vinayak Kulkarni From: Arun Khan To: Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2013 11:39 AM Subject: Re: [PLUG] Mailing list issues - Quick vote On Wed, Jan 9, 201

Re: [PLUG] Mailing list issues - Quick vote

2013-01-09 Thread vaibhav
A: +1 *Regards*, Vaibhav On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote: > The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on > what is expected. A quick vote should help. > > A: Open up the list completely, no moderation > B: Remove restrictive moderation, keep basi