2013/1/9 Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay :
> I have been reading this thread for a while. And, not just this
> iteration. There are a couple of things which leave me a bit upset.
> One, the original email from Sudhanwa left more issues un-addressed
> than it did by way of explanation. The exposition was mo
2013/1/5 Thin Rhino :
> The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on
> what is expected. A quick vote should help.
>
> A: Open up the list completely, no moderation
> B: Remove restrictive moderation, keep basic moderation in place
> C: Let it be as it is, no change
>
On 18 January 2013 11:40, म.हा.सा.ग.र wrote:
> Actually why there is no D option is what I am currently wondering...
Because I did not want any "D"'s to vote :)
___
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List
On 13 January 2013 09:37, मःसागरः wrote:
> If you have been on PLUG mailing list for long and still your mails
> are getting blocked. Then imagin yourself to be in chrooted jail
> environment and instead of making noise think of how you can get out
> of that still manage to remain an active memb
On Tuesday 08 Jan 2013 5:01:49 PM ag@gmail wrote:
> A: +1. Open as in OpenBSD, and not Linux.
>
> -ag
>
> --
> pl. excuse brevity and possible typos, sent from a tiny device.
>
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Kaustubh Gadkari
wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
> >> The
A: +1. Open as in OpenBSD, and not Linux.
-ag
--
pl. excuse brevity and possible typos, sent from a tiny device.
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Kaustubh Gadkari wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
>
>> The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusio
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:15 PM, vaibhav wrote:
> A: +1
>
> *Regards*,
> Vaibhav
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
>
>> The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on
>> what is expected. A quick vote should help.
>>
>> A: Open up the list compl
A: +1
*Regards*,
Vaibhav
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
> The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on
> what is expected. A quick vote should help.
>
> A: Open up the list completely, no moderation
> B: Remove restrictive moderation, keep basi
A: +1
Lets hope quick(..rather any) response from admin/moderators.
Vinayak Kulkarni
From: Arun Khan
To: Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2013 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [PLUG] Mailing list issues - Quick vote
On Wed, Jan 9
On Wednesday 09 Jan 2013 6:25:28 PM steve wrote:
> On Saturday 05 January 2013 09:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
> > The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on
> > what is expected. A quick vote should help.
> >
> > A: Open up the list completely, no moderation
> > B: Rem
On Saturday 05 January 2013 09:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on
what is expected. A quick vote should help.
A: Open up the list completely, no moderation
B: Remove restrictive moderation, keep basic moderation in place
C: Let it
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
> Just two days ago, my reply to an OP on security certification was
> trapped by a "Suspicious Header" filter. It took close to 42 hours to
> get moderator approval. This is after so much discussion on opening
> up this mailing list.
I have be
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Kaustubh Gadkari
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
>
>> The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on
>> what is expected. A quick vote should help.
>>
>> A: Open up the list completely, no moderation
>> B: Remo
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
> The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on
> what is expected. A quick vote should help.
>
> A: Open up the list completely, no moderation
> B: Remove restrictive moderation, keep basic moderation in place
> C: Le
> - On 7 January 2013 14:32, G Karunakar wrote:
> -- On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
>>> The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on
>>> what is expected. A quick vote should help.
>>>
>>> A: Op
On 7 January 2013 14:32, G Karunakar wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
>>> The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on
>>> what is expected. A quick vote should help.
>>>
>>> A: Open up t
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
>> The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on
>> what is expected. A quick vote should help.
>>
>> A: Open up the list completely, no moderation
>> B: Remove restr
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
> A: Open up the list completely, no moderation
> B: Remove restrictive moderation, keep basic moderation in place
> C: Let it be as it is, no change
A mailing list maintained using a standard mailing list software has
two distinct roles - admin/a
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Thin Rhino wrote:
> The issue is been dragged on for ages and I also see a lot of confusion on
> what is expected. A quick vote should help.
>
> A: Open up the list completely, no moderation
> B: Remove restrictive moderation, keep basic moderation in place
> C: Let
19 matches
Mail list logo
