> > AG, you didn't yet reply to my question, what
> Win2K service pack are
> > you using? Try updating to the latest SP4?
>
> I am using FF 1.0, win2K SP4.. No problems at all.
> Please send in your
> machine config and software config..
>
> Aditya
Hi,
I didnt reply to your mail, since FF/Plug
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:51:11 +0530, Vishal Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:40:36 +0530, Kaustubh Gadkari
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "The frame info doesnt render properly.
> > >
> > I went to the above url. The frame rendered correctly. I'm using Firefox
> > 1.0PR.
>
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:40:36 +0530, Kaustubh Gadkari
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "The frame info doesnt render properly.
> >
> I went to the above url. The frame rendered correctly. I'm using Firefox
> 1.0PR.
Ya, other people are also saying "WFM" in the bug report you posted
too... WFM==Worked
>
> "The frame info doesnt render properly.
>
I went to the above url. The frame rendered correctly. I'm using Firefox
1.0PR.
Kaustubh
--
I'm telling you that the kernel is stable not because it's a kernel,
but because I refuse to listen to arguments like this.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
> Nope, seems to be fine on my machine (FF 1.0 on
> Win2K Server) doesnt
> have the premature wrapping in your screenshot
> (which didnt get posted
> to PLUG list) attachment. But I only checked it just
> now. Maybe the
> website is fixed now (if it was ever borked). Or
> maybe you have some
> FF e
--- Vishal Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:00:07 + (GMT), A G
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The homepage is not FF complient.
> > http://www.plug.org.in/
>
> By FF you mean Firefox? How is it not compliant?
> Which version are you
> checking against?
>
> I'm using
> >
> With the assumption that FF=firefox, the plug site
> renders perfectly on my
> machine.
FF guys say that the issue is fixed in "Trunk",
whatever does that mean.
My bug in the bugzilla database -->
"The frame info doesnt render properly.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Visit
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 12:34:40 + (GMT), A G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Vishal Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using FF 1.0 on Win2K Prof.
> Please take a look at the screenshot I am attaching.
> The following info/frame is all skewed
> "General
>
> How To Talk (for more effective meet
On Tuesday 30 Nov 2004 3:30 pm, A G wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The homepage is not FF complient.
> http://www.plug.org.in/
>
With the assumption that FF=firefox, the plug site renders perfectly on my
machine.
Kaustubh
--
Linux: because a PC is a terrible thing to waste
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] put th
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:00:07 + (GMT), A G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The homepage is not FF complient.
> http://www.plug.org.in/
if FF == "firefox":
FF isn't a standard. Its a browser/viewer.
standrd is the one which you find on www.w3c.org
else:
what is FF?
Regards,
Shantano
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:00:07 + (GMT), A G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The homepage is not FF complient.
> http://www.plug.org.in/
By FF you mean Firefox? How is it not compliant? Which version are you
checking against?
I'm using FF 1.0 (the moox.ws win32 pentium4 optimised build) and it
actu
Hi,
The homepage is not FF complient.
http://www.plug.org.in/
~A.
___
Moving house? Beach bar in Thailand? New Wardrobe? Win £10k with Yahoo! Mail to
make your dream a reality.
Get Yahoo! Mail www.yahoo.co.uk/10k
--
___
12 matches
Mail list logo
