On Tue Oct 26, 2004 at 05:57:46PM +0800 Harsh Gupta wrote...
> Hi,
> What's the reason behind putting the sizes of all the /proc contents zero.
Hi,
I speak for kernel 2.4; about 2.6 I don't have much idea, but it
shouldn't be different.
The proc filesystem does not map to any space on the hard dr
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:57:46 +0800, Harsh Gupta
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> What's the reason behind putting the sizes of all the /proc contents zero.
>
Maybe this could answer your questions
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/ref-guide/ch-proc.html
--
Clifford
--
__
Hi,
What's the reason behind putting the sizes of all the /proc contents zero.
harsh
--
___
Graffiti.net free e-mail @ www.graffiti.net
Check out our value-added Premium features, such as a 1 GB mailbox for just US$9.95
per year!
Powered by Outblaze
