On Tuesday 07 June 2011 08:40:36 Gaurav Pant wrote:
> As we all know something happened to skype... (overtaken by someone)
> so now what other alternatives do we have for the same?
What are the requirements?
- pc to pc calling
- voip to pstn calling
- video chat
- work with all the network topolo
On Saturday 28 May 2011 19:21:58 Mayuresh wrote:
> Any suggestions?
run windows xp in virtualbox.
--
Regards
Shridhar
___
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List
On Sunday 20 March 2011 13:10:20 Mayuresh wrote:
> http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_38
> Process grouping by session sounds interesting among the features...
That feature is available in userspace for plenty of time.
following script can be used to launch a process(firefox say) in a separate
s
On Friday 11 March 2011 09:29:30 Gaurav Pant wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Ghodechhap
wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 March 2011 22:44:15 Mayuresh wrote:
> >> Not that the standards didn't exist before. But why do we have this era
> >> of "IE only"
On Thursday 10 March 2011 22:44:15 Mayuresh wrote:
> Not that the standards didn't exist before. But why do we have this era of
> "IE only" sites?
laziness.. lot of people do not realize(d) that "It works on my machine" is a
problem.
besides, making a site work in both IE and firefox(or other br
On Saturday 20 November 2010 13:57:28 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 11/20/2010 11:57 AM, Ghodechhap wrote:
> > Use ext4. its faster that ext3 in general and has faster fsck. Mount
> > option auto_da_alloc takes care of possibility of of data loss. Besides
> > most data loss
On Saturday 20 November 2010 12:50:31 Mayuresh wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:57:59AM +0530, Ghodechhap wrote:
> > and I still recommend btrfs :) You can snapshot the data and access it at
> > will. Something very important for backup drive.
>
> Thanks for ext3/ext4 in
On Saturday 20 November 2010 11:20:30 Mayuresh wrote:
> I am looking to format a new HDD for use with Linux. The drive will be
> mainly used as backup drive.
>
> I'd not like to go with btrfs as yet.
> Would prefer to choose between ext3 and ext4.
>
> I have been using ext3 on all my systems til
