On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Mayuresh wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:59:39PM -0600, Kaustubh Gadkari wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mayuresh wrote:
>> > http://www.cio.in/news/microsoft-counted-key-linux-contributor-245792012
>> >
>> > Just numeric illusion I suppose.
>>
>> Wh
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Mayuresh wrote:
> No problems with that. (Look I am not a stereotype MS basher.) All that I
> mean is the numbers do not necessarily indicate _intent_ to contribute.
This is an interesting way of putting it. The numbers for everyone
would indicate that they see si
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:59:39PM -0600, Kaustubh Gadkari wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mayuresh wrote:
> > http://www.cio.in/news/microsoft-counted-key-linux-contributor-245792012
> >
> > Just numeric illusion I suppose.
>
> Why? If they contributed those many changes to the kernel,
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mayuresh wrote:
> http://www.cio.in/news/microsoft-counted-key-linux-contributor-245792012
>
> Just numeric illusion I suppose.
Why? If they contributed those many changes to the kernel, then so be
it - they deserve to counted as a contributor. It is what it is.
http://www.cio.in/news/microsoft-counted-key-linux-contributor-245792012
Just numeric illusion I suppose.
Mayuresh
___
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List
