On Sunday 10 October 2010 19:01:48 Mayuresh wrote:
> Legal matters is one thing. The premise of doing all this being "security"
> of "operating systems developed in western countries" and instead "have
> source code that nobody knows about" - at least the choice of words is
> not very convincing.
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Mayuresh wrote:
> There is this news article in some newspapers today:
>
> "India to develop its own OS"
>
> http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/infotech/hardware/India-to-develop-its-own-futuristic-computer-operating-system/articleshow/6719490.cms
[...]
All hogw
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:43:24PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> And I think law will say that the government is a single oraganization.
>
> --
> Regards
> Shridhar
Interesting. Though not sure whether the statements that came in media are
with all this thought.
Particularly see this: Th
On Sunday 10 October 2010 13:11:30 Mayuresh wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:39:19PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > Who knows, that might be the case, except releasing the modifications
> > back to community. That could be debated but still complies with the
> > license, if not spirit.
>
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:39:19PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> I doubt. There might be some private modifications to linux/bsd that they
> don't want to release and as far as security goes, it does not really help to
> publish the exact source code that is used for creating the binary dis
On Sunday 10 October 2010 11:38:34 Mayuresh wrote:
> There is this news article in some newspapers today:
>
> "India to develop its own OS"
>
> http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/infotech/hardware/India-to-develop-its-
> own-futuristic-computer-operating-system/articleshow/6719490.cms
>
> Accor
