On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Harish Pillay wrote:
>> I totally agree with the author's view but business is business, this is
>> just a pure business decision, MS is fully aware that most of the enterprise
>> networks today are hybrid (Proprietary and FOSS) hence the move. We may hate
>> Bill a
> I totally agree with the author's view but business is business, this is
> just a pure business decision, MS is fully aware that most of the enterprise
> networks today are hybrid (Proprietary and FOSS) hence the move. We may hate
> Bill and his evil MS empire and all but we can't downplay what h
Do keep in mind that the hand of Microsoft was forced in this case
and the GPL'ing of the code was because of how they screwed up
in the first place. Even though Sam Ramji [1] is spinning the story
it is still a violation and their hand was forced, ever so reluctantly.
[1] http://www.theregister.
Taken from: http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7439/1.html
We put this question to Linus, asking whether this patch was something
he would be happy to include, even though it’s from Microsoft. He
replied:
“Oh, I’m a big believer in “technology over politics”. I don’t
care who it comes from, as lo
4 matches
Mail list logo
