Re: Tokamak 3 - The organization begins

2009-07-17 Thread Ivan Čukić
> But yesterday in the news there was an article about that the Schengen area > is thinking about omitting the VISA duty for Serbia, Montenegro and Yes, unfortunately it is not going to happen on the time for T3. So, I'll definitely need it as soon as possible (have no idea how long the VISA proc

Re: Tokamak 3 - The organization begins

2009-07-18 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi > Ok. Would it be ok if I write some invitation. I'm just a person and no > company ... but hey, wait, I've got some company. I'm not really sure. I think it would be better if the e.V. writes the invitation to avoid the questions like "and what is he to you". It is much easier to get Visa fo

Re: Tokamak 3 - Last bits

2009-07-23 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Thursday 23 July 2009 10:00:53 Chani wrote: > one thing i'm not clear on - are we supposed to be arriving on the > 28th or starting on the 28th? and the same for the end date... > btw, if people who have already booked post their flight #s maybe we > can get some people on the same flights :) Th

Re: Prospective costs of the 3rd Plasma meeting (Tokamak3) - part 2

2009-07-23 Thread Ivan Čukić
> What is Ana's email address? For a...@ktown.kde.org I get a failure. And are Ana Cecília Martins Barbosa: anaceciliamb at gmail.com And, yes, she is on plasma-devel list. cheerio! ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org

Re: Prospective costs of the 3rd Plasma meeting (Tokamak3) - part 2

2009-07-24 Thread Ivan Čukić
> > or maybe we take the train to the airport saturday night and find > > somewhere to sleep near there. or drink all night ;P > > In Zurich I could offer this ;-). I live their right beneath the Airport > ;-). In a shared flat. I'd give you a key or call the other people of the > flat. I guess t

Re: Prospective costs of the 3rd Plasma meeting (Tokamak3) - part 2

2009-07-27 Thread Ivan Čukić
> I would like to thank everybody in the board for this help, and say that Let us all join in saluting the board! Great news :) > food if there are no restaurants and we need to cook by our own?) > What do you think ? And everyone needs to learn to prepare one national meal :) (do we have anyone

Re: Tokamak 3 for those who won't be there

2009-07-31 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Friday 31 July 2009 00:39:54 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > hi ... > > at the last tokamak we had a twitter group; this time it will be an > identi.ca group ;) Why don't we just (ab)use the !kde group and add tag #Tokamak3? Cheerio ___ Plasma-devel mailing l

Re: Tokamak 3 for those who won't be there

2009-07-31 Thread Ivan Čukić
> and take down 10 more characters from the precious 140? ;) seriously, No, it is 5 more chars - one space and !kde (compared to just !Tokamak3) :) (we could shorten #Tokamak3 to #Tok3 or #T3) > that's probably a good idea :) I know ;) ___ Plasma-devel

Plasma activities and Nepomuk

2009-07-31 Thread Ivan Čukić
A.S. This is a multi-list message, so make sure you reply to both plasma-devel and nepomuk-kde lists. Hi all, As you probably know, plasma has the concept of activities. This is something that is supposed to become global concept, and not only plasma-local. Use-cases: - When John switches to

Re: Plasma activities and Nepomuk

2009-07-31 Thread Ivan Čukić
> personally, i prefer the idea of a nice API behind which the real work can > hide (as the usercontext thing provides). direct access to what's going on Ok, then I'll go for that. > another big question is what the ontology to use is. when i last left off Well, at this point, I don't think it is

Re: [nepomuk-kde] Plasma activities and Nepomuk

2009-08-03 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi, > Note though, that the plasma folks have their own thing in their head > regarding this topic, so maybe I am missing someone important who Heh, I am one of the Plasma folks. :) The reason I started this topic now is that we are approaching Tokamak 3 (meeting of Plasma developers / hackaton

Re: [nepomuk-kde] Plasma activities and Nepomuk

2009-08-07 Thread Ivan Čukić
> > > Btw, a bit offtopic, but shall we share favourites between those menus? > > you're not sharing them? :( There are both pros and cons for this. Pros are easy to recognize. The main con (and the reason why Lancelot only loads the favs from Kickoff on first start, but doesn't share them) is t

Re: [nepomuk-kde] Plasma activities and Nepomuk

2009-08-07 Thread Ivan Čukić
> Ivan, I would like to clear up something here: I understand that when > you are saying context, you mean the Activities the user is doing. If I ever said context, I apologize, naturally I was always referring to activities. I may have started to use the context term due to the playground exampl

Re: [nepomuk-kde] Plasma activities and Nepomuk

2009-08-07 Thread Ivan Čukić
> what would you do with an activity type that you couldn't do with just the > activity name? The type could be used by the /activity switching/ plasmoid - to group the activites, or to show only a certain type of activity... (this is the only thing that comes to my mind at the moment :) ) Chee

Re: [nepomuk-kde] Plasma activities and Nepomuk

2009-08-08 Thread Ivan Čukić
> be in it anyways, the contextChanged signal would have the new context, > that would contain not only the activity name but also the type.. I'd rather have a typeForActivity(String activityName) than having the parameter type as a part of the signal. (since type is defined by the activity na

Re: [nepomuk-kde] Plasma activities and Nepomuk

2009-08-08 Thread Ivan Čukić
> The activity type can have the following options (these need be set > only while defining a new activity type, not while creating every > activity!) > - Activity Type Name (user given string) > - Show apps (in menu) related to productivity, etc > - Allow / Disallow / Provide hint about messages

Re: IRC Meeting: virtual desktops 2.0

2009-09-01 Thread Ivan Čukić
+1 for not before 10 :) 2009/9/1 Aaron J. Seigo : > On September 1, 2009, Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> So we just need a time. I think we should do it somewhen in the morning or >> early afternoon (UTC time) so that Lucas can join us. So perhaps on >> Thursday morning. > > works for me. before 10am wo

Re: Tokamak III Wrap Up

2009-09-05 Thread Ivan Čukić
A few errors: Rob's surname (beginning of the text) "Community and Team-building efforts" passage is not finished - it ends in "during the sprint, and a number of" "While Kickoff is in theory a competitor, or rather a replacement for Kickoff, Cukic showed great team..." - strange isn't it - lik

Kickoff Krunner whitelist

2009-09-09 Thread Ivan Čukić
Here is the list of current runners (that I have installed) http://pastebin.ca/1560026 Which ones should be enabled in kickoff? (that is, which ones don't crash :) ) Cheerio! ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailm

Re: Kickoff Krunner whitelist

2009-09-10 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Thursday 10 September 2009 21:13:38 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On September 9, 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > Here is the list of current runners (that I have installed) > > http://pastebin.ca/1560026 > > > > Which ones should be enabled in kickoff? > > i think ju

Re: Kickoff Krunner whitelist

2009-09-11 Thread Ivan Čukić
> 1. Keyboard navigation of the search results appears to have broken, > can you please have a look at that. The only thing changed is the data model. Do you have any idea how that could screw up the keybd nav? > 2. The search results for applications now take longer to appear than > they used

Re: Review Request: RunnerManager: Whitelist enforcement (bugfix)

2009-09-11 Thread Ivan Čukić
> so setAllowedPlugins probably needs to store its list in a separate key and > compare against it first. will commit a patch shortly. > OK, I'll cancel the review request ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/

Tokamak 3 - Photos

2009-09-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi all, I've finally managed to torrent the photos from Randa without crashing KTorrent. The .torrent file is attached. There are a few merged panoramic pictures (from 2 to 4 merged photos) so, those are a bit larger in size (both in sense of dimensions and number of KB). I would kindly ask ev

Re: Tokamak 3 - Photos

2009-09-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
p.s. the tracker is http://drako.homelinux.org/announce (i hope it works) ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Tokamak 3 - Photos

2009-09-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Saturday 12 September 2009 11:03:27 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: > And someone upload the pictures on flickr for unfortunate people like me > whose admins have blocked torrents. I'll upload some of them - they are 100MB in total - a bit too much to send via http :) cheers __

Re: Tokamak 3 - Photos

2009-09-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
I've posted some photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ivan-cukic/sets/72157622346934426/ ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Nepomuk+Plasma review

2009-09-23 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi all, Here is the preview of the nepomuk activities for plasma started at T3. This is not in any sense a final version, that is, it will need a lot more testing (with nepomuk both enabled and disabled). Currently, I'm hunting a few bugs left related to activity storing. The good thing is tha

Re: Nepomuk+Plasma review

2009-09-23 Thread Ivan Čukić
> any chance you could put it up on reviewboard? :) Ok, although it is not yet meant for merging. http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1699/ http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1700/ Cheerio ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mai

Re: Tokamak 4 dates

2009-10-06 Thread Ivan Čukić
The second half of February is cool for me aswell (exams period is in the beginning - and this time I'm on the "other side" as a teaching assistant :) ) Cheers ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plas

Re: Plasma->Model/View->Nepomuk

2009-10-06 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi, what happens when you just restart plasma (kquitapp plasma-desktop; sleep 2; plasma-desktop) - does it load the data then? How do you access nepomuk? Via its classes or via d-bus? > session, when KDE starts, it seems, plasma is started before Nepomuk You can check whether this is the case

plasma+nepomuk activities, take N

2009-10-13 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi all, I've seen the thread about the activities overview. Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind activities, virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk integration in order to introduce it alongside the new overview (I guess we'll be able to do it for 4.5

Re: plasma+nepomuk activities, take N

2009-10-13 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 11:00:45 Marco Martin wrote: > On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've seen the thread about the activities overview. > > > > Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind >

Re: plasma+nepomuk activities, take N

2009-10-13 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 19:17:26 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On October 13, 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind > > activities, virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk > > integration in order to intr

Re: plasma+nepomuk activities, take N

2009-10-15 Thread Ivan Čukić
> I'd still like to see a minimal implementation of this to already get used > to having this kind of stuff. So please, don't postpone. Plasma is not the > only potential user of this ... Heh, Sebas, you haven't read the rest of the mails :) I was talking about the plasma-ui integration (the th

Activities service in KDEreview

2009-10-21 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi all, After some time I spent "on the ice" due to problems with compiling Qt 4.6, I've finally been able to polish the activities service. It is now in kdereview/nepomuk-activities-service We can not really start doing anything else concerning the activities until this gets accepted. A few t

Re: Activities service in KDEreview

2009-10-29 Thread Ivan Čukić
> As I understand the code, current activity is globally modal? Yes. Although plasma will be the main manager of activities, other applications can be as well. I'm currently preparing a bit of nepomukification of the storage (as per Sebastian's instructions) - will be committed very soon. Che

Re: Activities service in KDEreview

2009-10-31 Thread Ivan Čukić
> That's interesting, but I am interested in the UI implications of having a > single modal current activity. That implies that exactly one activity is > visible at one time - including in such exotic setups as second monitors. ee > How does your model handle that? Well, this was discussed befor

Re: Activities service in KDEreview

2009-11-02 Thread Ivan Čukić
Updated version in kdereview - it uses nepomuk in a much better way. Since the ontology is not yet written, it uses a dummy link http://www.kde.org/ontologies/activities#Activity which can later be changed or made to redirect to a real rdf. If anyone (Sebastian) has a better idea for the url, ple

Re: Kickoff's search and Recent Applications list

2009-11-04 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Wednesday 04 November 2009 15:09:15 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Wednesday 04 November 2009 14:24:48 Qwerty Maniac wrote: > > I've already written a patch to cover this 'issue' and will submit it > > to the reviewboard if this isn't a design decision. Waiting for > > answers :) > > Please submi

Re: Widget Explorer usability problems

2010-01-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
> > Here is a idea for a way to remove widgets and more than one of the same > > kind http://imagebin.ca/view/UaQTcxW.html The idea for listing and removing/killing running widgets was to have it in Ctrl+Escape dialogue - just like when killing/listing normal processes. Cheerio. -- You know,

Re: Need a couple of volunteers (was: Re: TokamakIV update)

2010-01-13 Thread Ivan Čukić
> > who raises hand? :) > > Would really need a couple more of "yes, i'm interested" :p I love gadgets, so when not working on plasma+nepomuk, I could join the mobile group as well :) Cheerio -- A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it wo

kdeplasma-addons libs

2010-01-18 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi, Are there any requirements for libs in kdeplasma-addons/libs? API, ABI compatibility? I'm asking because I'm thinking of moving liblancelot and liblancelot- datamodels there so that other projects could use them. (including plasma dataengines based on models in L) Cheerio, Ivan __

Re: kdeplasma-addons libs

2010-01-18 Thread Ivan Čukić
> that they are maintained ;) lol :) Ok, so expect two /new/ libs there soon :) Cheerio! -- Before you talk to me, I should warn you: I am kind of strange ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma

Re: notifications, again :D

2010-01-25 Thread Ivan Čukić
> last thing i was thinking about was something that resembles rssnow: > http://imagebin.ca/view/fiFONCc.html It /looks/ like a nice idea but whether it really is is hard to tell. The problem I see with it is that it complicates the interaction even more than it is now. We really need Seele for

Re: notifications, again :D

2010-01-26 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Tuesday, 26. January 2010. 11.57.36 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > On Monday 25 January 2010 13:20:56 Marco Martin wrote: > > opinions? comments? > > would like to hear some feedback before implementing anything since each > > solution would lead to a different total screwing of the current > > imp

Re: notifications, again :D

2010-01-26 Thread Ivan Čukić
> in general, i agree with the approach you describe, but i think it needs to > be a bit more involved behind the scenes to ensure a spammy app doesn't > take over and that the notifications and jobs are sensible. > > which is what my looong email reply describes :) Cool, so we take a operating s

Re: T4: Opening Day Presentations

2010-01-26 Thread Ivan Čukić
> if you do have a topic you'd like to do a "full" presentation on, please do > add it to the wiki and we will work out a schedule for them. Chani and I will cover the activities. We'll meet on IRC soon to discuss how to divide the topic. Cheerio -- Money can't buy happiness, but neither can

Re: TokamakIV update

2010-02-03 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Wednesday, 3. February 2010. 23.22.20 Lukas Appelhans wrote: > Hey! > > Just to give an update from my side... I will arrive at 18:24 on Friday and > will depart at 17:33 on sunday... anyone got the same times (and maybe the > same train, it's some ICE)? You should fill that info to T4 page on

Re: activities

2010-02-05 Thread Ivan Čukić
> We seem to have two or three definitions of the word "activity" in kdebase > now. Oops. > First, there's the original: desktop containments. > Second, there's the nepomuk activities: they're UIDs that can have an > associated name, and then other arbitrary things can be associated with > them. T

Re: Tokamak IV breakout groups

2010-02-05 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Friday, 5. February 2010. 21.02.37 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On February 5, 2010, Lukas Appelhans wrote: > > I think we should have a working group (only for a few hours maybe) about > > how we manage application menus... (especially interesting for Ivan, > > ruphy, Nuno et moi) > > sounds good;

Re: Tokamak IV breakout groups

2010-02-08 Thread Ivan Čukić
> > We may want to integrate it with Nepomuk, get some thoughts about sharing > > as most code as possible and get some enlightenment on the concept of > > TOM... > > This could probably be merged with the mobile one for like even just a > couple of hours. I'm not for merging - then we'd have to

Re: Tokamak IV breakout groups

2010-02-18 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Thursday 18 February 2010 Marco Martin wrote: > On Thursday 18 February 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > if you would like to give a presentation, add it to the list as well. > > > > I wonder if I should give one on Silk. Not sure in how far it's actually +1 :) Cheerio, Ivan -- Before

4.5 - Activities

2010-03-08 Thread Ivan Čukić
Ok gang, check out the https://svn.kde.org/home/kde/trunk/playground/base/nepomuk-kde/libactivities The code is currently organized into following: - services/kded The KDED service independent from Nepomuk (that is, it works even if Nepomuk is not enabled, otherwise it passes the necessary info

Re: Tokamak 4 photos

2010-03-08 Thread Ivan Čukić
> so i finally uploaded tokamak 4 pics :) sorry, I'm late as always ;-) That reminds me, I should post these few of mine as well :) > I created (and am now seeding) a torrent with small versions of the pics i > took in nuremberg (already filtering out most crap). photos are small > resolution me

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-10 Thread Ivan Čukić
> so... I dunno... should we build the API so that it's possible to have >1 > visible activity? or should we decide that the activity is completely > global, and then figure out how to gracefully handle changes in the number > of monitors? > > I'd prefer the latter, but I just don't have experie

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-10 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On March 8, 2010, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > - libs/consumer > > ActivityConsumer - basic access to kded service for normal apps > > ActivityInfo - access to extra info provided by nepomuk - this one will > > prob

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-10 Thread Ivan Čukić
> hmm. am i reading this correctly that this kded service is only needed if > nepomuk is not there, and that it serves as a cache-in-the-middle between > nepomuk and the applications? this seems like a lot of overhead just to this was one of the kwin people wishes. Even with nepomuk, a cache-in-th

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-10 Thread Ivan Čukić
> sorry, i wasn't clear enough. i meant where in kdelibs :) :) I have no idea :) > i'd recommend workspace/libs/kworkspace/. runtime isn't for libs :) Ok :) > runtime isn't for libs; and i think it does make sense next to Consumer. > perhaps they could both go into kdelibs/nepomuk? would have t

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-10 Thread Ivan Čukić
> there's also a penalty for keeping the cache in sync across multiple > clients. > > the other concern is memory usage due to having that cache around ... The cache is in the kded service - so no need to sync anything. Or I misunderstood you? So the memory overhead is not big at all. > i'd rea

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-11 Thread Ivan Čukić
> kdeui and even kio do not currently depend on nepomuk. a puzzler :) we > should ask Sebastian Trueg for some guidance here i think. Well, these classes don't depend on nepomuk directly, that is, no nepomuk linking required. The Controller class is completely usable without it. That's why I tho

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-11 Thread Ivan Čukić
> ah, and it's transfered over dbus to the client app on each call? Only on request - if the client wants list of activities, it is sent to it. The same goes for (soon to be) activitiesForResource. It is not like those methods should be called that often. The alternative (discussed with kwin gu

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-11 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Thursday 11 March 2010 Marco Martin wrote: > > > even go so far as to suggest that there should be a LocationResource in > > > the ResourceType enumeration. Just a note about types - the enum values are for the built-in support of resource types and are provided for *convenience*, if an applic

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-11 Thread Ivan Čukić
> registerDocumentWindow? :) Since we are renaming Document to Resource in the API, any pretty names for this one with the resource in it? (I'm not that thrilled about registerResourceWindow, although it will have to do if we don't find something better...) Cheerio, Ivan -- Money can't bu

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-26 Thread Ivan Čukić
Updates: - all manager signals converted into listener objects - consumer signals left as is (they are not invoked that often, and are something most applications should respond to eventually) - changed d-bus API to fit the style of other KDE services - added test shell script for nepomuk se

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-31 Thread Ivan Čukić
> can we get together on irc soon and do a once-over of this and then get it > moved into kdereview? Ok, I'll try to be online tomorrow. If not, then the weekend? > if we work around subsystems because "they don't work well yet" then the > odds they ever will work well goes down as there is less

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-03-31 Thread Ivan Čukić
> the important motivator for nepomuk is "applications using it". aka > "relevance". I agree on this one, I just wanted to point out that our usage of Nepomuk is not that advanced, thrilling or anything to be a driving force for devels. As for relevance, your statement stands ;) > how can i say

Re: 4.5 - Activities

2010-04-06 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 Chani wrote: > On March 31, 2010 11:37:51 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On March 31, 2010, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > > > can we get together on irc soon and do a once-over of this and then > > > > get it moved into kdereview? > > > &g

Re: SoC Updates -- Kontact and Skrooge Plasma Dashboards

2010-04-23 Thread Ivan Čukić
> You might want more control over the applets than the newspaper > containment---again, I'm not sure, but in my experience, apps with > different use-cases, form factors, and intended plasma widgets will want While I agree that no containment can suit all applications, if we choose the way of i

Re: using "org.kde." prefixes to our plugin names

2010-05-13 Thread Ivan Čukić
> in one of those "better late than never, right?" things: i'd like to see us > pre-pend "org.kde." to all of the X-KDE-PluginInfo-Name= entries in our > .desktop files for new plugins we ship, to avoid potential name collisions > outside our little universe. Does that mean we could even change th

Re: Panel icon sizing bug in 4.4

2010-05-23 Thread Ivan Čukić
> There appears to be a bug, or at least a change in behavior for panel icon > sizing in KDE 4.4 (specifically Debian 4.4.3-2). In previous versions of > KDE (e.g., 4.3), panel icons would resize with the panel up to at least > 48x48. However, as of KDE 4.4 panel icons appear to be restricted to

Re: Panel icon sizing bug in 4.4

2010-05-23 Thread Ivan Čukić
> wait a sec... it's not greyed out for me. I can change the icon size. > however, X randomly crashed before I could test whether plasma follows it. > now I'm pissed off at my computer, so I'm gonna go do something else. Strange, for the panel icon, it was disabled (for me) since I can remember :

Re: Panel icon sizing bug in 4.4

2010-05-24 Thread Ivan Čukić
This will be needed in Plasma::PopupApplet as well. I'll can do it when this gets accepted. Cheerio -- While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words Dying to believe in what you heard I was staring straight into the shining sun ___ Plasma-dev

Re: Panel icon sizing bug in 4.4

2010-05-25 Thread Ivan Čukić
> Seems to do the trick on my end. Your thoughts? popupapplet:866 When on desktop, popup applet is not an icon, so it should return Plasma::Applet::sizeHint(...) Other things seem ok Cheerio, Ivan -- The bleeding hearts and artists, Make their stand. -- Pink Floyd _

Re: Panel icon sizing bug in 4.4

2010-05-25 Thread Ivan Čukić
> Seems to do the trick on my end. Your thoughts? p.s. Do you have SVN account? Cheerio, Ivan -- You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives... -- Monty Python

Re: 4.5 polishment: krunner (under_the_hood)

2010-05-30 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi Lukas, > Or scrape that library and make it a private implementation in krunner It is too late for 4.5. Which is good from my POV since it will be able to integrate with activities in 4.6*. BTW, where is the code located? Cheerio, Ivan * Maybe even get it integrated into the activities ne

Re: 4.5 polishment: krunner (under_the_hood)

2010-05-30 Thread Ivan Čukić
> I didn't push it anywhere yet, but I can surely commit it to playground if > you want me to... It would be cool so that we can see what's the best way to continue from here. Cheerio, Ivan -- Money can't buy happiness, but neither can poverty. -- Leo Rosten __

Re: 4.5 polishment: krunner (under_the_hood)

2010-05-31 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Monday, 31. May 2010. Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On May 30, 2010, Lukas Appelhans wrote: > > Anyway, there are some problems to implement it in the krunner-core > > (which unfortunately is in kdelibs afaik)... > > > > So, I split out a library for usage with statistics at Tokamak already, > > whic

Re: 4.5 polishment: krunner (under_the_hood)

2010-06-01 Thread Ivan Čukić
> Well we need if we want to have the applications ranked/get a useful > score... > > AppStats::score() does some final calculations based on the last launched > date... Oh, I forgot that. > I could make it like: StatsLib::launched(Nepomuk::Resource)... and then And this :) so, we need API

Re: Panel icon sizing bug in 4.4

2010-06-02 Thread Ivan Čukić
> One more issue: the "simple" Application Launcher Menu (which I prefer to > kickoff) needs to be fixed too. Attached is a patch based on the Icon > applet changes that fixes the MenuLauncher applet too. Sorry, my bad, forgot to commit the changes... it should be ok now. Cheerio, Ivan -- Whil

Re: dreaming...

2010-06-02 Thread Ivan Čukić
> > 80 euro per hour. That's a tad low (esp with the low euro now) so let > > me know if that would be completely unacceptable. > > it completely depends on where in the world the person lives. i'd suggest > drafting the timeline and then finding out, based on that, what can be >From my point of

Re: 4.5 polishment: krunner (under_the_hood)

2010-06-07 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Monday, 7. June 2010. Lukas Appelhans wrote: > Ok to give you guys an update on this... > > I will try to move from our own ontology to a more generic one which is > already in shareddesktopontologies, for that I've mailed Evgeny so we can > discuss how to continue here... The stats need to be

Re: plasma @ akademy

2010-06-21 Thread Ivan Čukić
> with those beyond just our own group. the idea would be to help extend / > expand the reach of Plasma across KDE and for KDE contributors to have more > input into what we are doing in a constructive atmosphere. what do you think? +1 for this one. We are all geniuses here, but we still need unin

Re: IRC meeting: point of what was done at akademy

2010-07-09 Thread Ivan Čukić
For me, it'd be perfect if this doesn't happen before Monday. Cheerio! -- While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words Dying to believe in what you heard I was staring straight into the shining sun ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@

Activity identicons v 1.99 :) (post-akademy)

2010-07-11 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi all, At aKademy, Nuno proposed a bit different design for identicons used for plasma activities. 1. The identicons should be showed inside a bubble with background and an overlay. 2. He will make some default icons for users that want to choose specific ones instead of the automatically genera

Re: Activity identicons v 1.99 :) (post-akademy)

2010-07-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
> now, what if $plasmoid wants to use the icon (eg, activity bar)? what if > $application wants to use the icon (eg. when associating something with an > activity)? it'd be nice if I could see the icons when assigning windows to > activities, but I dunno if that'd be possible with autogenerated one

Re: Activity identicons v 1.99 :) (post-akademy)

2010-07-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
0. Not going to discuss about the reasoning behind identicons again. 1. Activities are no more only /desktop-setups-group-of-widgets/ so making thumbnails can be counter-productive - you can keep the desktop empty in all activities and still want to use other activity-related features. Or if you l

Re: Activity identicons v 1.99 :) (post-akademy)

2010-07-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
> me realy does not care much as long as we have something that looks pretty and > is easy to recognize by the user, i proposed to do those icons because wen I > saw how our Chani chose random icons to represent them, i had my typical "your > icons look soo ugly used like that" feeling...  so I pro

Re: Activity identicons v 1.99 :) (post-akademy)

2010-07-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
> -in the activity configuration, there would be something that looks like a > combobox to chose icons, that shows just the set of "20 good ones" or an > "other..." option Yeah, we'll need to discuss this one a bit more - whether it is good (usability-wise) to make a separate UI for icon choosing.

Re: IRC meeting: point of what was done at akademy

2010-07-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
WORKSFORME as well On 11 July 2010 16:21, Ryan Rix wrote: > On Sun 11 July 2010 7:32:14 am Chani wrote: >> On Saturday, July 10, 2010 03:41:47 am Marco Martin wrote: >> > On Saturday 10 July 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> > > On July 9, 2010, Marco Martin wrote: >> > > > oh, fsck, scrap that: i r

Re: Activity identicons v 1.99 :) (post-akademy)

2010-07-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
> separate UI? wuh? 1 - menu of icons and a 'more...' option 2 - standard icon chooser when 'more...' is clicked > I'm starting to wonder if maybe it's not so bad to leave it to the user. After > all, we don't try to auto-name the activity for them, new activities currently > start at "unnamed"...

Re: Activity identicons v 1.99 :) (post-akademy)

2010-07-13 Thread Ivan Čukić
> Yeah, I could do that, but while I'm not afraid of reading blogs, typical > users won't do that. It'd be really great if by SC 4.6 it was easily I completely agree. For 4.5 it was not the case since we only scratched the surface. > discoverable for common users (and advanced users alike) what a

Activities protocol

2010-07-13 Thread Ivan Čukić
a.s. This is a cross-post Hi, A few notifications and questions. 1. The ActivityManager (KDED module) now accepts application name/id when the application notifies it that it has opened a document (or any other type of resource that has an url) If the name is not specified, KWindowInfo is used

Re: Activities protocol

2010-07-13 Thread Ivan Čukić
On 13 July 2010 15:45, Marco Martin wrote: > it must be done indeed. > but is it possible to automatically unlink it as well when the window > is detached from the activity? Yes, but that would be undesired - if you open a file from an activity, it belongs to it. (and possibly other activities as

Re: Activities protocol

2010-07-14 Thread Ivan Čukić
> just curious, why's he doing... whatever he's doing... on a per-application > basis? does it matter whether I opened a document in kate, kwrite or okular? Stats like this are always good to have when you can have them. 1. Apps' recent files could be replaced to work better (with activities and a

Re: Activities protocol

2010-07-14 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi Sebastian, First of all, I hope you are on plasma-devel since a lot of people didn't take me seriously concerning the cross-posting... > So applications need to notify it about opening a doc manually? I am > asking because I started implementing the exact same thing and we should Yes, the app

Re: [Nepomuk] Activities protocol

2010-07-14 Thread Ivan Čukić
> Sebastian: > once more just so this is not forgotten: there is no need for ranking - > at least not on the data level - when linking the activity to the event > rather than to the file. Agreed. The only problem I see is that we'll need much more complex queries when sorting the results by usage.

Re: [Nepomuk] Activities protocol

2010-07-14 Thread Ivan Čukić
> i think windows outside of the current activity should be hidden from the > taskbar, at least by default. > and this must be done in 4.5, otherwise will cause another ser revolt. I agree. The current plan is to have it in 4.5.1 - Chani thinks it would be risky to do it for .0 - not enough testin

Re: [Nepomuk] Activities protocol

2010-07-14 Thread Ivan Čukić
> I'm not against doing it in 4.5, if someone can do it without introducing bugs I'm willing, but I'll need a hint - how to expose the things you did to libtaskmanager? -- While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words Dying to believe in what you heard I was staring straight into the s

Re: [Nepomuk] Activities protocol

2010-07-14 Thread Ivan Čukić
> ?event nuao:involves ?r . ?r relatedTo activity > > (just a rough example) > The sorting is the complicated one - it should be done according to some formula like this: sort rating = number-of-times-used / log (days-from-last-usage) (this formula was for when had only those two fields remember

Re: [Nepomuk] Activities protocol

2010-07-14 Thread Ivan Čukić
> On July 14, 2010, Luca Beltrame wrote: >> From what I'm reading on the forums these days, it may happen, as there is >> already a lot of discussion on activities (sometimes heated). > > this is not a good reason to make these kinds of decisions. being directed by > the popular topic of the day am

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >