Review Request 126524: Fixed custom wallpaper being not respected by sddm.

2015-12-26 Thread Joshua Noack
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126524/ --- Review request for Plasma and David Edmundson. Repository: sddm-kcm Des

Jenkins-kde-ci: plasma-workspace Plasma-5.5 stable-kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 26 - Still Failing!

2015-12-26 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD FAILURE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/plasma-workspace%20Plasma-5.5%20stable-kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/26/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:42:10 + Build duration: 4 min 5 sec CHANGE SET Revision 608648aa05db3d70f8a4

Plasma 5.6 schedule

2015-12-26 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Here's a proposed schedule for Plasma 5.6 as discussed at the kickoff meeting https://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/Plasma_5 https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=031gkgqg1hjf8lcmj0em1d2sj8%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=Europe/London Frameworks tag is Feb 6th for Frameworks 5.19 Repo free

Re: Review Request 126319: Plasma 5.6 "Graphite" Wallpaper

2015-12-26 Thread Boudhayan Gupta
> On Dec. 22, 2015, 6:43 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > +1 from me too > > I quite like it. perhaps i'm not too sold as well on that little line that > > has very tiny itams (a bit too much Intel sticker?) but overall is very > > pretty. I was going to say the exact same thing. +1 on the overal

[Powerdevil] [Bug 353356] Powerdevil does not respect the critical level configuration

2015-12-26 Thread LtWorf
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353356 Salvo "LtWorf" Tomaselli changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |--- Status|NEEDSINFO

Re: Review Request 126319: Plasma 5.6 "Graphite" Wallpaper

2015-12-26 Thread Ken Vermette
> On Dec. 22, 2015, 1:13 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > +1 from me too > > I quite like it. perhaps i'm not too sold as well on that little line that > > has very tiny itams (a bit too much Intel sticker?) but overall is very > > pretty. > > Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > I was going to say the e

Re: Review Request 126319: Plasma 5.6 "Graphite" Wallpaper

2015-12-26 Thread Ivan Čukić
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126319/#review90131 --- I have mixed feelings about this one. (to oppose those that ar

Re: Review Request 126319: Plasma 5.6 "Graphite" Wallpaper

2015-12-26 Thread Ken Vermette
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126319/ --- (Updated Dec. 27, 2015, 12:04 a.m.) Review request for Plasma. Changes

Re: Review Request 126319: Plasma 5.6 "Graphite" Wallpaper

2015-12-26 Thread Ken Vermette
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126319/ --- (Updated Dec. 27, 2015, 12:05 a.m.) Review request for Plasma. Reposito

Re: Review Request 126319: Plasma 5.6 "Graphite" Wallpaper

2015-12-26 Thread Ken Vermette
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126319/ --- (Updated Dec. 27, 2015, 12:22 a.m.) Review request for Plasma. Reposito

Re: Review Request 126319: Plasma 5.6 "Graphite" Wallpaper

2015-12-26 Thread Ken Vermette
> On Dec. 26, 2015, 11:51 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote: > > I have mixed feelings about this one. (to oppose those that are against it, > > and those that are for it) > > > > I like the picture. It would be awesome as a background for some > > kde-plasma-related brochures, videos etc. > > > > I'm n

Re: Review Request 126319: Plasma 5.6 "Graphite" Wallpaper

2015-12-26 Thread Ken Vermette
> On Dec. 22, 2015, 1:13 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > +1 from me too > > I quite like it. perhaps i'm not too sold as well on that little line that > > has very tiny itams (a bit too much Intel sticker?) but overall is very > > pretty. > > Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > I was going to say the e

Re: Review Request 126319: Plasma 5.6 "Graphite" Wallpaper

2015-12-26 Thread Ken Vermette
> On Dec. 11, 2015, 7:08 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote: > > > Attached images directly to request; if this is not the preferred way of > > > attaching large files > > > > Attaching just one file would be fine, I mean this is just to see it right? > > So there's no need to upload /all/ the resolut