-* packages built from the systemd source, but for
the moment I'd be perfectly happy if it was simply included in the main
systemd binary package!
Best regards and Thanks for your hard work!
Alexander Kurtz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
/crontab
alexander@shepard:~$
Best regards
Alexander Kurtz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin
details). Maybe the fix needs
to be placed in the preinst script instead of the postinst?
Best regards
Alexander Kurtz
=== Log ===
root@shepard:~# apt purge systemd-cron
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package 'systemd-cron&#x
guess this is just a simple
oversight in the Debian packaging. Given that u-boot can apparently
nowadays provide an UEFI emulation [4], this might make things like
"bootctl install" on your Raspberry Pi 3 possible!
Best regards
Alexander Kurtz
[0] https://packages.debian.org/sid/i386/system
e also available there (in contrast to "armel" where gnu-efi is
missing).
Thanks again!
Alexander Kurtz
[0] https://packages.debian.org/sid/gnu-efi
[1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/u-boot-rpi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
n both virtual and
physical hardware. That's certainly not going to be easy, but fixing
the Debian packaging of systemd seemed like the lowest hanging fruit!
;-)
Best regards
Alexander Kurtz
[0] https://media.ccc.de/v/946-uefi-grub2-on-raspberry-pi
[1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/u-boot
systems!
Best regards
Alexander Kurtz
[0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/4055
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
Package: systemd
Version: 232-6
Severity: normal
Hi!
The attached patch fixes a bug which causes "kernel-install remove" to
fail; please review.
Best regards
Alexander KurtzFrom c09b346dab9944df904e6146b43392886edf47f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Kurtz
Date: Sun, 27 N
d libnss-myhostname from Debian
as both aren't really maintained anymore and have been superseded
by libnss-resolve.
Best regard
Alexander Kurtz
[0]
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=5e0095416366eb86590d6e31242097ded5201b3a
[1] https://github.com/sys
line in all of the most common use cases!
Best regards
Alexander Kurtz
[0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/859
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers
start randomly segfaulting...
What do you think?
Best regards
Alexander Kurtz
[0] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-systemd/systemd.git
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git
[2]
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=4e9d85b78fd369b0ee8ec8700322ce10f335c219
[3] ht
much!
Best regards
Alexander Kurtz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 15:46 +0100, Alexander Kurtz wrote:
> Well, then there's nothing left to say except thank you very much!
... and also that this actually works; my kernel command line is now
only "quiet rw", and the system still boots!
Best regards
Alexander Ku
t@shepard:~#
However, please also feel free to simply close this as NOTABUG. Thanks
again for your quick reply!
Best regards
Alexander Kurtz
reproduce-854911.sh
Description: application/shellscript
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 19:04 +0200, Alexander Kurtz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems that the fix for #820088 introduced in systemd-cron version
> 1.5.4-2 is incomplete: At least on my system the setgid bit is only
> correctly cleared after I re-install systemd-cron, but not after the
eems to be gone. After
reading up a bit on systemd's upstream and Debian bug tracker, I'm even
more confused than before: Which package is supposed to manage
permissions on /dev/kvm in Debian? Which package is supposed to create
the "kvm" group? Is the missing access for local
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 17:50 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jan 2018 18:21:33 +0100 Alexander Kurtz wrote:
> > Package: systemd
> > Version: 236-3
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Until recently, /dev/kvm was made accessible to local users by this
> &g
But then again, this was in 2011.
So, ultimately this is a maintainer decision, I just wanted to warn you
that people might trip over this on stretch -> buster upgrades!
Best regards
Alexander Kurtz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
18 matches
Mail list logo
