Package: systemd-sysv
Version: 204-10
Severity: serious
Justification: triggers a debian-policy defined dpkg error (§7.4)
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-sysvinit-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi *,
I got a report (now…) that apt segfaults in a wheezy → sid upgrade.
Debugging this leads to the following univer
Am 16.05.2014 16:26, schrieb David Kalnischkies:
> Package: systemd-sysv
> Version: 204-10
> Severity: serious
> Justification: triggers a debian-policy defined dpkg error (§7.4)
> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-sysvinit-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Hi *,
>
> I got a report (now…) that apt segfaults in a
On 2014-05-16 17:33 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Incidentally we also discussed dropping the Conflicts from systemd-sysv
> and only keeping the Replaces (and this is also what sysvinit-core has
> done).
Which has its own problems, since nothing stops the admin from shooting
themselves in the foo
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #748311 [systemd] systemd: unknown operation 'dump' in reportbug script
Added tag(s) pending.
--
748311: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
control: tags -1 + pending
Hi James,
James Cowgill writes:
> The reportbug script for systemd prints
> Unknown operation 'dump'
>
> The script calls "systemctl dump" but the dump operation has been moved to
> systemd-analyze in v208.
Thanks for the report. This is fixed with
http://anonscm.deb
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #747741 [src:systemd] systemd-sysv, systemd: please clairfy /sbin/init
choice in package description
Added tag(s) pending.
--
747741: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747741
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the dnsmasq package:
#724602: dnsmasq: Please enable systemd unit on install and fix it
It has been closed by Simon Kelley .
Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanatio
Hi,
I've been bitten by this bug too, though in a different manner.
I still have the acpi-support package installed on my laptop. When I push the
suspend button, my system will suspend, as expected.
When I resume (minutes or hours later, as the case may be), the system will
then resume properly,
Hi Wouter
Am 16.05.2014 23:05, schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
>
> It might be good for logind and acpi-support to coordinate better on
> this matter. If acpi-support has already suspended the machine, there is
> no need for logind to do the same (or vice versa).
See [0]. This bug has been open for a w
