Hi,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:02:05PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Sorry, this one fell through on my end. It is ok from my PoV, CC'ing
> > KiBi for a d-i ack (out of principle). Quoting you in full for KiBi's
> > convenience.
>
> ooh, getty-static.service <3
>
> No objections, thanks.
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Niels Thykier (2015-02-23):
> On 2015-02-16 17:16, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > systemd 215-12 hit unstable three days ago with some RC/important/sa
Control: tags -1 = d-i
On 2015-02-16 17:16, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> systemd 215-12 hit unstable three days ago with some RC/important/safe
> So far there have been no regression repo
Hey Niels,
Niels Thykier [2015-02-16 20:10 +0100]:
> I have not had time to review this fully. However, I noticed #778565,
> which suggests a regression in this version of udev. I am putting this
> unblock request on hold until you have had a time to review #778565.
Michael and I responded to t
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2015-02-16 17:16, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> systemd 215-12 hit unstable three days ago with some RC/important/safe
> So far there have been no regression r
