Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:29:54 -0700 Nikolaus Rath
wrote:
> On 04/22/2015 07:36 AM, chrysn wrote:
> > it is my current impression that things fail when there are nested mount
> > points, and the outer mount point needs a time-consuming fsck.
> >
> > nikolaus, is that plausible with your system
On 04/22/2015 07:36 AM, chrysn wrote:
> it is my current impression that things fail when there are nested mount
> points, and the outer mount point needs a time-consuming fsck.
>
> nikolaus, is that plausible with your system?
Yes, that's possible. I have a mount for /home as well as to mounts f
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 05:03:31PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 22.04.2015 um 16:36 schrieb chrysn:
> > it is my current impression that things fail when there are nested mount
> > points, and the outer mount point needs a time-consuming fsck.
>
> With outer mount point, do you mean underlying
Am 22.04.2015 um 16:36 schrieb chrysn:
> hello,
>
> i've encountered a very similar situation (log files attached), tricky
> to debug because booting would only occasionally fail.
>
> it is my current impression that things fail when there are nested mount
> points, and the outer mount point need
hello,
i've encountered a very similar situation (log files attached), tricky
to debug because booting would only occasionally fail.
it is my current impression that things fail when there are nested mount
points, and the outer mount point needs a time-consuming fsck.
nikolaus, is that plausible
