Am 16.07.2014 17:25, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 16.07.2014 17:22, schrieb Michael Biebl:
>
>> See
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752428
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752430
>
> sorry, meant
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752425
>
Am 16.07.2014 17:22, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> See
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752428
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752430
sorry, meant
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752425
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752428
B
Am 16.07.2014 16:38, schrieb Norbert Preining:
> Hi Michael,
>
>>> Update to 208-6 broke xfce suspend-to-ram. Option greyed out.
>>> Worked all the way till this update.
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752939
>
> Why? I am not running systemd-shim?
>
> un systemd-shim
Hi Michael,
> > Update to 208-6 broke xfce suspend-to-ram. Option greyed out.
> > Worked all the way till this update.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752939
Why? I am not running systemd-shim?
un systemd-shim (no description available)
ii systemd-sysv
Am 16.07.2014 08:45, schrieb Norbert Preining:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 208-6
> Severity: important
>
> Update to 208-6 broke xfce suspend-to-ram. Option greyed out.
> Worked all the way till this update.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752939
--
Why is it that all of th