On Thursday 16 June 2016 00:26:59 Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Dear Michael,
>
> On Monday, 6 June 2016 1:53:02 PM AEST Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Now, regarding my concerns: The size increase is one (which will affect
> > everyone if we ship it s part of the systemd package).
>
> Michael, I don't know
On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:58:54 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 05.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
> > Could we introduce raw "systemd-sysusers" binary ASAP to fix "rkt" please?
>
> The size is a concern, and we mentioned this before.
> This really is a wishlist bug, so bumping the severity
On Sun, 15 May 2016 14:01:20 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Can you clarify a bit more, why exactly rkt needs systemd-sysusers?
rkt (aka stage0) supports several stage1 flavors (the component responsible
for running the containerized-app/stage2). Debian package currently defaults
to the "host" s
On 29/10/2015 14:05, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>
> Hello Luca,
>
> Luca Bruno [2015-10-29 12:29 +0100]:
>> I've put a simple service in /lib/systemd/system. Doing systemctl
>> start/stop on this service works correctly, howeve
On 29/10/2015 14:05, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>
> Hello Luca,
>
> Luca Bruno [2015-10-29 12:29 +0100]:
>> I've put a simple service in /lib/systemd/system. Doing systemctl
>> start/stop on this service works correctly, howeve
Package: systemd
Version: 215-17+deb8u2
Hello, using systemd 215-17+deb8u2 on jessie.
I've put a simple service in /lib/systemd/system. Doing systemctl
start/stop on this service works correctly, however enable/disable
doesn't work: "Failed to execute operation: No such file or directory".
The r
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:41:59 +0200 Luca Bruno wrote:
> I've tried this patch and looks like adding another bug to me. Please
> confirm what I'm experiencing. It's true, it does not remove cgroups
> created by systemd, but then it doesn't cleanup cgroups that systemd
Control: unarchive -1
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:43:30 +0100 Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> so the patch that got proposed at
>
>
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-September/023276.html
>
> actually makes a lot of sense: This makes systemd only clean up
> cgroups that it
