ing systemd-networkd.
FWIW, users can always download the old packages (232-25+deb9u1) from
snapshot.d.o:
http://snapshot.debian.org/package/systemd/232-25%2Bdeb9u1/
Michael/systemd maintainers, I think we should go forward with the
upload to p-u; anything I can do to help?
Cheers
Hi Russ,
Russ Allbery (2018-03-14):
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
>
> > I've put up an amd64 build for stretch here:
> > https://people.debian.org/~kibi/systemd/
>
> > along with the source package. I'm also attaching the source debdiff.
>
> > I
Marc Haber (2018-03-15):
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 05:24:07AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I've put up an amd64 build for stretch here:
> > https://people.debian.org/~kibi/systemd/
> >
> > along with the source package. I'm also attaching the source d
Hello Russ & Marc,
Cyril Brulebois (2018-03-14):
> Russ Allbery (2018-03-12):
[…]
> Yeah, that seems very likely… Even if the word regression or the commit
> ID doesn't appear in the commit message, the follow-up commit seems to
> fix this specific i
d with this extra cherry-pick for you to
double check; I'll post a link once it's available.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP s
ug
> accordingly.
Thanks Michael.
Added to my personal d-i/10 tracker; I'll poke at it when time permits
if nobody from debian-boot@ steps up in the meanwhile.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member
nks for considering a fix through stretch-proposed-updates.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
diff -Nru systemd-232/debian/changelog systemd-232/debian/changelog
--- systemd-232/debian/changelog 2017-07-05 20:31:25.0 +
+++ systemd-232/de
.oO( Third time is the charm? )
Cyril Brulebois (2017-08-24):
> Michael Biebl (2017-08-24):
> > Am 23.08.2017 um 23:57 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> >
> > > My NMU FTBFSes on mips64el:
> > >
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=systemd&
Michael Biebl (2017-08-24):
> Am 23.08.2017 um 23:57 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
>
> > My NMU FTBFSes on mips64el:
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=systemd&arch=mips64el&ver=234-2.1&stamp=1503523165&raw=0
> >
> > Jame
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2017-08-23):
> Michael Biebl (2017-08-23):
> > Am 23.08.2017 um 10:08 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > > Would you be OK with a minimal NMU to fix the missing file? This issue has
> > > been blocking the D-I Buster Alpha 1 release for weeks already (e
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Michael Biebl (2017-08-23):
> Am 23.08.2017 um 10:08 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > Would you be OK with a minimal NMU to fix the missing file? This issue has
> > been blocking the D-I Buster Alpha 1 release for weeks already (even if it
> > hadn
Hi,
Michael Biebl (2017-08-19):
> Am 19.08.2017 um 14:38 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
>
> > A timely fix would be appreciated, the breakage(s) in the graphical
> > installer prevented us from releasing debian-installer over the past few
> > weeks, and it would be great not
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi,
(Again, please keep debian-boot@ in copy.)
Raphael Hertzog (2017-08-19):
> > I've only quickly glanced at the contents of both packages, and
> > debdiff mentions no obvious issues (file lists are the same).
>
> I believe this is precisely the problem. The new udev-ude
Michael Biebl (2017-05-29):
> Nah, that would be for buster. I didn't mean to imply we should change
> the status quo for stretch.
Ah, all good then. Feel free to request the code change in finish-install
to turn current code into rm so that the installed system no longer gets
that remnant from t
Hi,
Michael Biebl (2017-05-19):
> In jessie we handled this slightly differently [1]. We had a dedicated
> service unit which checked if /etc/mtab was a symlink. So we didn't run
> into the issue there, that the symlink can be absolute or relative and
> point to either /proc/mounts or /proc/self/
Adam D. Barratt (2017-04-02):
> Apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
>
> The proposed diff looks okay to me but, whilst afaics the udeb
> shouldn't be affected, I'd still appreciate a d-i ack; CCing and
> tagging appropriately.
No objections (note the “via via” in the diff though), th
Michael Biebl (2017-02-02):
> ppc64 != ppc64el, or am I missing something?
Sorry, I read the patch too quickly and thought the missing 'el' part in
changelog was a typo. I'll shut up now, sorry for the noise.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
Hi Erwan,
Erwan Prioul (2017-02-02):
> AFAIK 4.9.6-x is not yet provided in the daily image for ppc64el.
> It's still the 4.9.2-2. Anyway, I ran a couple of tests with
> 4.9.6-3 and 4.8.15-2, and I got the same error.
The switch from 4.9.2 to 4.9.6 was first seen with d-i daily builds
with this
Hi,
Michael Biebl (2015-10-27):
> I'd like to see the priority of libpam-systemd bumped from optional to
> standard.
> The recent changes in xserver-xorg make it possible to run X without
> root privileges [1], which is awesome! This requires a proper logind
> session though, for which libpam-sys
Control: retitle -1 installation-reports: systemd refuses to boot (/etc/mtab
vs. /proc/self/mounts)
Control: reassign -1 finish-install
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tag -1 - d-i
Control: affects -1 installation-reports
Hi Henry,
Henry Williams (2015-10-18):
> Comments/Problems:
>
> On
Ritesh Raj Sarraf (2015-09-28):
> Hmmm... I'll look into it later. But when you say "No systemd in d-i",
> does it mean that is how it is going to remain ?
I'm not sure why there would be a need to change that in the near
future.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
[ Adding debian-b...@lists.debian.org back. ]
Ritesh Raj Sarraf (2015-09-28):
> Adding systemd maintainers
>
>
> Hello Cyril,
>
> THank you for the bug report.
>
>
> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 11:59 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Package: multipath-udeb
&
Hi,
fsate...@debian.org (2015-08-22):
> Package: keyboard-configuration
> Severity: important
> User: pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: init-rcs-service
(maintonly considered slightly annoying.)
> Hi,
>
> Your package keyboard-configuration has an initscript that is e
Michael Biebl (2015-07-19):
> Am 17.07.2015 um 19:17 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
> > [tag]
> > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/systemd-no-service-for-init-rcS-script.html
> > , but there are some false positives in this list.
>
> ..
>
> > dd-list of affected packages:
>
> This list seems to be inc
Cyril Brulebois (2015-07-16):
> Uploaded and accepted into tpu, thanks.
And binary builds are getting rejected due to the python3-systemd binary
which was split out of src:systemd, and has a higher version in testing
(230-1 >> 221-1+deb9u1).
I've therefore cherry-pi
Niels Thykier (2015-07-16):
> On 2015-07-16 09:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >> > As for doing a t-p-u: sounds fine with me.
> >> > I'll be around today/Thursday but then away until Monday. But systemd is
> >> > in more then capable hands with Martin.
Hi,
Michael Biebl (2015-07-16):
> Am 15.07.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> > Cyril Brulebois [2015-07-15 18:03 +0200]:
> >> Bottom line(s):
> >> ---
> >> I'll be testing 221-1 to make sure I reproduce the issue with a full
> >>
(tl;dr: See bottom.)
Hi,
So Michael just approached me regarding having this merged before
Stretch Alpha 1: (A)
| commit 7b5eb265bbb2b783cbf7563b57db2f5a9b5cc3cf
| Author: Martin Pitt
| Date: Sat Jul 11 11:56:42 2015 +0200
|
| Fix udeb an initramfs for net.ifnames
|
| - debian/u
#include
Christian Kastner (2015-06-07):
> I looked into this and I can reproduce the issue. In one of the
> Makefiles, there's a test for the presence of gperf(1), and if so,
> stuff happens, and the above symbol eventually gets added.
Yeah, and that tool is indeed present in the devel chroot
Hello Christian & Michael,
Michael Biebl (2015-06-08):
> Am 07.06.2015 um 23:59 schrieb Christian Kastner:
> > On 2015-06-07 23:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >> Christian Kastner (2015-06-07):
> >> | @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> >> | libcap.so.2 libcap2 #MINVER#
Hello Christian,
Christian Kastner (2015-06-07):
> Sorry for the delay, I was AFK until just now.
>
> I've prepared a quick upload consisting of only Matthias' patch, minus
> the superfluous d/shlibs.local as discussed in Michael's follow-up to
> the patch.
>
> I do still need a sponsor, though
(Adding debian-boot@ back.)
Michael Biebl (2015-06-02):
> Control: block -1 by 782475
>
> Hi KiBi et al,
>
> Am 02.06.2015 um 18:11 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > libudev1-udeb depends on missing libcap2. I suspect the easiest would be
> > to drop libcap2 supp
Package: libudev1-udeb
Version: 218-1
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
(Please keep debian-b...@lists.debian.org cc'ed.)
Hi,
libudev1-udeb depends on missing libcap2. I suspect the easiest would be
to drop libcap2 support from the udeb build. An alternative would
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Leroy (2015-05-10):
> Package: netcfg
> Version: 1.131
> Severity: normal
> Tags: d-i
>
>
> I use preseeding to install Debian on several servers, which each have
> two ethernet cards.
>
> The network interfaces seems to be detected twice by Debian Installer,
> who ask me
Cyril Brulebois (2015-04-26):
> Looking at the basically unconfigured bind9 server, it seems to fail at
> resolving a bunch of things, see log below my signature.
>
> Since the server's running normally for now, I might only experiment
> without the local bind to see if the
Control: severity -1 important
Michael Biebl (2015-04-26):
> Can you post the output of
> systemctl status network.target network-online.target networking.service
>
> A verbose journal dump (with systemd.log_level=debug) might be helpful
> as well.
There might be something fishy going on with t
Michael Biebl (2015-04-26):
> How do you configure your network? ifupdown, allow-hotpluto, auto?
>
> network-online.target should actually be mostly functional if you use
> ifupdown.
# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
# The primary network interface
allow-hotplug et
Package: aiccu
Version: 20070115-15.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: daemon not starting
(X-d-cc: pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org)
Hi,
on a jessie system (upgraded from wheezy), aiccu fails to start at
boot-up. systemd reports:
| root@glenfiddich:~# systemctl status
Michael Biebl (2015-04-23):
> Am 23.04.2015 um 22:22 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > Michael Biebl (2015-04-23):
>
> >> netboot install writes duplicate entries to 70-persistent-net.rules
> >> ~~~
>
Hi!
Michael Biebl (2015-04-23):
> I talked to the release team and they prefer to postpone a fix to 8.1.
> I therefor would like to see a short paragraph added to the d-i 8.0
> errata [1].
>
> Afaics, the issue so far only happened for automated installations.
> There is no real solution/workaro
Martin Pitt (2015-04-17):
> I just tried the current rc2 installer (netinst image/graphical) and
> it does not actually ask me whether I want to encrypt my home
> direction. It seems you got this option?
I tried to follow the code path in Ubuntu, which offers this option, to
track down where the
Martin Pitt (2015-04-16):
> Hello Cyril,
>
> Cyril Brulebois [2015-04-16 19:40 +0200]:
> > Anyway, asking for home encryption indeed leads to swap encryption,
> > through a ecryptfs-setup-swap call, which in turn triggers:
> > |echo "cryptswap$i UUID=$uu
(Cc: debian-boot@ added.)
Martin Pitt (2015-04-16):
> Hello release team,
(With my d-i release manager hat.)
> yesterday I discovered that systemd breaks a common way of setting up
> plain cryptsetup partitions. Turns out that this has already been
> known for a while, but the impact wasn't app
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Julien Cristau (2015-04-12):
> Control: tags -1 d-i
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 13:40:57 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > systemd 215-15 hit
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Niels Thykier (2015-02-23):
> On 2015-02-16 17:16, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > systemd 215-12 hit unstable three days ago with some RC/important/sa
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Niels Thykier (2015-02-06):
> Control: tags -1 d-i
>
> On 2015-02-01 21:16, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > systemd 215-11 hit unstable three days ago
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Niels Thykier (2015-01-25):
> I have re-instated my unblock hint and updated it to affect 215-10.
> (Re-)CC'ing KiBi for a d-i ack.
(Let's keep my d-i ack to-do list empty:) No objections.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
Hi,
and thanks for your report.
Robert Tomanek (2014-12-30):
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: important
>
> I've installed 2014-12-26 build of debian testing with btrfs as root fs -- so
> far so good, this worked fine.
So that's not really something that should be tracked through th
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Niels Thykier (2014-11-18):
> On 2014-11-18 13:18, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Hey Niels,
> >
> > Niels Thykier [2014-11-18 7:16 +0100]:
> >> The changes look reasonable. But before you upload it, would it be
> >> possible to include patch for #754987 (comment #119 or #129
Hi,
Steve Langasek (2014-11-10):
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:39:28AM -0500, Gedalya wrote:
> > On 11/10/2014 02:19 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > >It's not for the sysvinit-core package to fix up the installer's handling
> > >of
> > >consoles, when sysvinit-core is not installed. Reassigning th
Hi,
Jessie Beta 2 images have been built and look good to me, so I've
therefore lifted the udeb freeze. The release announce should be
published somewhen this sunday.
debian-cd people: as mentioned on IRC, feel free to sign and put
images into place.
systemd/dbus people: your packages should be
[ Sorry for the lag. ]
Michael Biebl (2014-09-02):
> Am 02.09.2014 10:03, schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf:
>
> > And by the way, can someone please shed some more light on Debian bug:
> > 760182
> >
> > Per the bug report, there is no systemd support in d-i. Which then means
> > that I need to disabl
Michael Biebl (2014-08-11):
> That is
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754987
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/07/msg01509.html
>
> I know a workaround, but haven't figured out the underlying cause yet.
FWIW I spent some time on #debian-systemd and idly noticed some
Michael Biebl (2014-08-11):
> > Am 11.08.2014 21:58, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > It really would have been nice to put debian-boot@ in the loop though.
> > Changing init when we're in the middle of trying to release d-i isn't
> > really something that has
Michael Biebl (2014-08-10):
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
>
> As part of the transition plan to switch the default init system to
> system for Jessie, the priorities of the sysvinit and sysvinit-core
> package were lowered. See also [1]
>
> Please change them to
>
> sysvinit:a
55 matches
Mail list logo
