On 2017-03-21 18:43, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:32:25PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> They are not missing. When I was talking about dependencies I meant the
>> Breaks/Replaces.
>
> but those are not "depends" and I do believe they have different effects than
> "depends"…
Package: systemd-sysv
Version: 232-12
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'jessie'.
It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'stretch' fails
because it tries to overwrite other
On 2016-06-15 15:15, Michael Biebl wrote:
> We recently changed "init" to no longer be essential. This means
> /sbin/runlevel is no longer guaranteed to be around.
> In case of invoke-rc.d it's probably best to have a sensible fallback if
> runlevel can't be found.
>
> That said, we probably have
Package: init-system-helpers
Version: 1.34
Severity: important
Hi,
I just noticed this in a piuparts log (#827374):
/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d: 1: /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d: /sbin/runlevel: not found
invoke-rc.d: could not determine current runlevel
invoke-rc.d: policy-rc.d denied execution of relo
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 18:15:45 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote:
> This bug as actually been fixed in 228-3 by
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=ea089f29bbd2583545b5c1a83756feafacf2801f
>
> We can't unfortunately fix the existing udev.prerm of older versions,
> only ma
Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 nmu: systemd_228-2
Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 binnmu
> Am 11.12.2015 um 11:21 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
>> 0m44.8s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left
Source: systemd
Version: 228-2
Severity: important
systemd FTBFS in my long grown sid chroot (which is sysv based, since
its initial creation predates systemd ...):
[...]
machine id ===
cat: /etc/machine-id: No such file or directory
debian/rules:260: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test
Package: udev
Version: 228-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-main
On 2015-10-21 01:14, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hm, might this bug in dpkg also be the root cause for
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801389#54
I didn't check in detail, but this sounds very likely.
Andreas
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers
Package: systemd
Version: 227-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: block -1 with 801156
Due to a bug in dpkg (#801156) a postinst script may be called without
an "configured-version" parameter on upgrades and therefore act like on
initial installs, ski
Package: kdbus-dkms
Version: 0.20150824t110616.0c05fbd-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
kdbus-dkms fails to install since it cannot build a module
for the current sid kernel. This is a test on a stretch host (3.16.0-4)
in a sid chroot with linux-headers-
Package: systemd-cron
Version: 1.5.2-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your packages cronjob exits with
error after the package has been removed.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m45.0s DEBUG: St
12 matches
Mail list logo
