On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:47:34PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016, at 16:41, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Implementing the various operation letters makes up half the problem.
> > The other half involves handling the various tmpfiles.d directories and
> > the precedence between them.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #802780 (http://bugs.debian.org/802780)
# Bug title: systemd: systemctl 227 fails in c
> -Original Message-
> From: Ansgar Burchardt [mailto:ans...@debian.org]
> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 2:27 PM
> To: 813...@bugs.debian.org; Suchánek Michal
> Subject: Re: Bug#813372: systemd: does not boot
>
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 14:06 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > This is the cul
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016, at 16:41, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Implementing the various operation letters makes up half the problem.
> The other half involves handling the various tmpfiles.d directories and
> the precedence between them. That includes the usual "override files
> with the same filename" mec
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:41:59AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:24:21PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > I never bothered to implement more than 'd', but I am happy to
> > contribute my sysvrc shell snippet I use as replacement for systems
> > without s
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:24:21PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I never bothered to implement more than 'd', but I am happy to
> contribute my sysvrc shell snippet I use as replacement for systems
> without systemd-tmpfiles installed.
>
> ```
> do_tmpfiles() {
> local type pat
Hi Michael,
I never bothered to implement more than 'd', but I am happy to
contribute my sysvrc shell snippet I use as replacement for systems
without systemd-tmpfiles installed.
```
do_tmpfiles() {
local type path mode user group age argument
if [ -r "$1" ]; then
if [ -x /bin/sy
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 14:06 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> This is the culprit:
>
> Feb 01 13:18:41 chromebook systemd[1]: dev-mmcblk1p5.mount: Mount
> process exited, code=exited status=32
> Feb 01 13:18:41 chromebook systemd[1]: Failed to mount
> /dev/mmcblk1p5.
>
> Your fstab has
>
> / /dev/mm
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #813372 [systemd] systemd: does not boot
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> retitle -1 fails to mount rootfs on mmcblk1p5 during boot
Bug #813372 [systemd] systemd: does not boot
Changed Bug title to 'fails to mount rootfs on mmcblk1p5 during boot' from
's
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 fails to mount rootfs on mmcblk1p5 during boot
Hello Michal,
Michal Suchanek [2016-02-01 13:36 +0100]:
> Attaching the output of journalctl -xb from the recovery shell on failed boot.
This is the culprit:
Feb 01 13:18:41 chromebook systemd[1]: dev-mm
Hi,
On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Brian May wrote:
> I see two patches here - one patch applies easy enough to schroot -
> 1.6-schroot-mount-make-bind-mounts-private.patch
>
> I am not sure what the
> master-libexec-mount-make-bind-mounts-private.patch is for, it seems to
> patch files not in schroot but
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 813141 udev
Bug #813141 [systemd] chroot upgrade from jessie to stretch disables
predictable network interface names
Bug reassigned from package 'systemd' to 'udev'.
No longer marked as found in versions systemd/228-4.
Ignoring request t
reassign 813141 udev
thanks
# we enabled net.ifnames in 220-7 by default; don't change iface names in
# virtualized envs (where 75-persistent-net-generator.rules didn't work)
I think we need a more precise check for affected systems rather than the
lack of existance of /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persi
On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Brian May wrote:
> Michael Biebl writes:
>
> > Have you tried the patch in
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786566
>
> I see two patches here - one patch applies easy enough to schroot -
> 1.6-schroot-mount-make-bind-mounts-private.patch
>
> I am not s
Michael Biebl writes:
> Have you tried the patch in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786566
I see two patches here - one patch applies easy enough to schroot -
1.6-schroot-mount-make-bind-mounts-private.patch
I am not sure what the
master-libexec-mount-make-bind-mounts-privat
Hello all.
Adding some information below...
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 08:42:27PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 30.01.2016 um 20:41 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:30:24 + Philipp Hug wrote:
> >> Hi Philippe,
> >>
> >> By looking at the co
17 matches
Mail list logo
