Processing control commands:
> forcemerge 770135 793814
Bug #770135 [systemd] systemd: ssh logins considerably delayed (until PAM
timeout) when systemd is upgraded but the system not rebooted
Bug #793814 [systemd] systemd-logind: Logins via ssh and su are delayed by 25
seconds
Bug #793814 [syste
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge 770135 793814
Bug #770135 [systemd] systemd: ssh logins considerably delayed (until PAM
timeout) when systemd is upgraded but the system not rebooted
Bug #793814 [systemd] systemd-logind: Logins via ssh and su are delayed by 25
seconds
Severity set to 'n
Control: forcemerge 770135 793814
Control: found 770135 222-2
Hi Steven,
On 27 July 2015 at 15:05, Steven Monai wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> There is an issue with the systemd-logind daemon that appears to be
> triggered whenever the dbus daemon is restarted.
>
> Specifically, after a recent 'a
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:13:25 -0300 Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> I'm afraid 2 is really an upstream issue and not an integration issue.
> >> Could you please file that bug upstream?
> >
> > Maybe... I will give it a try tonight. However I am sceptical regarding
> > "productive" communication with up
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #791897 (http://bugs.debian.org/791897)
# Bug title: systemd: incorrect x bit for grou
Hey Niels,
sorry for the delay, I was on holiday.
Niels Thykier [2015-07-15 7:20 +0200]:
> If you are planning on using "comma" as the canonical separator, please
> consider also updating the examples in your documentation. E.g. your
> [1] still says:
>
> """
> The source package provides a te
Hi,
bancfc wrote (26 Jul 2015 18:19:59 GMT) :
> The research comes from WhonixOS a privacy centric distro like TAILS.
For the record, this does not imply any position from Tails regarding
this topic: the Tails threat model generally does not apply as-is
to Debian.
Also, it would be good to descr
