On Apr 22, 2015, at 8:17 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Could you copy /lib/systemd/system/lvm2-activation.service to
> /etc/systemd/system and add a line
> After=mdadm-raid.service
> to the [Unit] section.
Will do. Thanks!
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers
FYI: The status of the systemd source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 215-16
Current version: 215-17
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
l
On 04/22/2015 07:36 AM, chrysn wrote:
> it is my current impression that things fail when there are nested mount
> points, and the outer mount point needs a time-consuming fsck.
>
> nikolaus, is that plausible with your system?
Yes, that's possible. I have a mount for /home as well as to mounts f
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 05:03:31PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 22.04.2015 um 16:36 schrieb chrysn:
> > it is my current impression that things fail when there are nested mount
> > points, and the outer mount point needs a time-consuming fsck.
>
> With outer mount point, do you mean underlying
Am 22.04.2015 um 12:10 schrieb Rick Thomas:
> This works. Interestingly, without the sleep loop the vgchange
> fails.
>
> Now, you say that a VM with two virtual disks configured as RAID1
> with a logical volume works fresh out of the box. This makes me
> wonder if it’s some kind of a timing pro
Am 22.04.2015 um 16:36 schrieb chrysn:
> hello,
>
> i've encountered a very similar situation (log files attached), tricky
> to debug because booting would only occasionally fail.
>
> it is my current impression that things fail when there are nested mount
> points, and the outer mount point need
hello,
i've encountered a very similar situation (log files attached), tricky
to debug because booting would only occasionally fail.
it is my current impression that things fail when there are nested mount
points, and the outer mount point needs a time-consuming fsck.
nikolaus, is that plausible
On 2015-04-17 18:22, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello Niels,
Niels Thykier [2015-04-17 17:55 +0200]:
Just to clarify, are we still intending to do a systemd update prior
to
Jessie with -17 and then now also a p-u (i.e. for 8.1) for ecryptfs?
That's still my intent, yes, primarily to avoid people who
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 765577 !
Bug #765577 {Done: Martin Pitt } [udev-udeb] netboot install
writes duplicates to 70-persistent-net.rules
Bug #777126 {Done: Martin Pitt } [udev-udeb] udev: duplicate
eth? entries
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been
reopen 765577 !
found 765577 215-14
thanks
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:06:47AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I see that we have independently devised the same fix, I am attaching
> a test case and a more refined version of your patch.
I tried Jessie RC3 today and immediately found that the fix is,
Hi Michael,
Thanks very much for helping me with this. (continued following quoted material)
On Apr 21, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>
> Am 18.04.2015 um 02:02 schrieb Rick Thomas:
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
