Geliebte
Heutzutage sind Gebete Wert als Gold und Diamanten. Sie sind derzeit
in der Prozess Durststrecken überwinden würde, aber wissen, dass der
Herr segne euch auf einem Weg, das heißt, in Situationen, wo nur er
kann Ihnen helfen zu glauben, bereit ist. Lassen Sie mich vorstellen,
me
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #779710 (http://bugs.debian.org/779710)
# Bug title: systemd: Please add architecture
Hello!
It looks like everything is waiting...
# systemctl list-jobs
JOB UNIT TYPE STATE
1 graphical.target start waiting
2 multi-user.targetstart waiting
81 systemd-update-utmp-runlevel.service start waiting
86 li
Hello,
for many years and up to Debian 7, I have been using a script to configure
some things while booting the system, i.e. I had a link in /etc/rcS.d/
which was executed directly after mounting local and remote filesystems
and before doing anything else (in my Debian 7, this is after
mountnfs-bo
Hi Paul,
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 08:47 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > which is one reason why "aptitude upgrade" is deprecated in favour of
> > "aptitude safe-upgrade".
>
> aptitude safe-upgrade has the same behaviour in this case, it still
> installs sysvinit-core instead of sys
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 08:47 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> which is one reason why "aptitude upgrade" is deprecated in favour of
> "aptitude safe-upgrade".
aptitude safe-upgrade has the same behaviour in this case, it still
installs sysvinit-core instead of systemd-sysv.
> But apt-get has a comman
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Actually, I just had an idea. We could make "init" have a Recommends:
> systemd-sysv in addition to the Pre-Depends: systemd-sysv |
> sysvinit-core | upstart
I like that idea!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , http://people.debian.org/~abe/
:
Am 09.03.2015 um 08:55 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Whether or not one should use aptitude flips around between releases so
>>> I believe people will be using it whether or not we recommend it for a
>>> particular release.
>
> That's not our issue then IMHO.
>
>> I do
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Whether or not one should use aptitude flips around between releases so
> > I believe people will be using it whether or not we recommend it for a
> > particular release.
That's not our issue then IMHO.
> I don't see a way to influence aptitude from within the "init"
Am 09.03.2015 um 03:24 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:43 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> I don't see, how this is a bug in init and what we should do about this.
>> Can you elaborate why you filed this against init?
>
> I wasn't sure which package was the cause of it and where the
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:45:28 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hi Gordon,
>
> thanks for the bugreport. I escalate this bugreport to the
> debian-release team, asking for advice: would you accept another
> cryptsetup upload targeted to jessie in order to add 'plymouth' to the
> list of recommended
Hi Paul,
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 19:35 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Why in the world would someone use apt-get and aptitude alternately
> > during a dist-upgrade?
>
> First apt-get upgrade does the easy upgrades.
> Then aptitude upgrade does the slightly harder upgrades (new pa
13 matches
Mail list logo
