Re: Processing of systemd_218-7_amd64.changes

2015-02-01 Thread Martin Pitt
Hey Michael, Michael Biebl [2015-02-01 22:11 +0100]: > greetings to Bruxelles! Thanks, it was nice indeed! > a/ http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/diff/?id=d5f4825 > > Why is that necessary? We already create the input group in udev.postinst? Argh, sorry for the blunder. Re

Bug#759515: marked as done (policykit-1: restarting systemd prevents me from performing policykit actions)

2015-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 Feb 2015 21:36:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#759515: fixed in systemd 218-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #759515, regarding policykit-1: restarting systemd prevents me from performing policykit actions to be marked as done. This means that you claim

systemd_218-7_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-02-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 20:48:49 +0100 Source: systemd Binary: systemd systemd-sysv libpam-systemd libsystemd0 libsystemd-dev libsystemd-login-dev libsystemd-daemon-dev libsystemd-journal-dev libsystemd-id128-dev udev libude

Re: Processing of systemd_218-7_amd64.changes

2015-02-01 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 01.02.2015 um 22:11 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Hi Martin, > > greetings to Bruxelles! > > a/ http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/diff/?id=d5f4825 > > Why is that necessary? We already create the input group in udev.postinst? And udev.postinst imho actually looks like the co

Re: Processing of systemd_218-7_amd64.changes

2015-02-01 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Martin, greetings to Bruxelles! a/ http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/diff/?id=d5f4825 Why is that necessary? We already create the input group in udev.postinst? b/ http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?h=experimental&id=c646e73e3b52313aede4ac598

Processing of systemd_218-7_amd64.changes

2015-02-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
systemd_218-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: systemd_218-7.dsc systemd_218-7.debian.tar.xz systemd_218-7_amd64.deb systemd-sysv_218-7_amd64.deb libpam-systemd_218-7_amd64.deb libsystemd0_218-7_amd64.deb libsystemd-dev_218-7_amd64.deb libsystem

unblock: systemd/215-11

2015-02-01 Thread Martin Pitt
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock systemd 215-11 hit unstable three days ago with some important/safe fixes. So far there have been no regression reports. I attach the full debdiff between 215-10 and -11, but as usual I als

Bug#774904: systemd: Some systems (upgrades?) fail to put journal into syslog

2015-02-01 Thread Daniel Dickinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have confirmed that on both systems I still have that were upgraded from wheezy that rsyslog has a system unit that does not get enabled. I suspect the third also had the same issue (it had log issues) but I had to revert it to jessie due to what lo