On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 16:40 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> $network is translated to network.target for LSB services, so it is in
> fact the same thing.
Sure...
> You're pointing out that «the network is up» is ill-defined. That is a
> correct observation and technically never true in a depend
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #742322 (http://bugs.debian.org/742322)
# Bug title: systemd aborts when activating a
]] Christoph Anton Mitterer
> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 16:35 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > By looking at that goal (which is a good goal of course) we "loose"
> > > however that strict serialisation that we more or less had with
> > > sysvinit.
> > sysvinit isn't serialised today either.
> Su
Hi Tollef,...
Let me see...
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 16:35 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > By looking at that goal (which is a good goal of course) we "loose"
> > however that strict serialisation that we more or less had with
> > sysvinit.
> sysvinit isn't serialised today either.
Sure... I mean
