[DRE-maint] Processed: block 651441 with 664152

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 651441 with 664152 Bug #651441 [src:nginx] passenger: Please create "nginx" passenger module 651441 was not blocked by any bugs. 651441 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 651441: 664152 > thanks Stopping processing here. Pl

[DRE-maint] Bug#663974: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following changes were made to the overrides... Concerning package libmocha-ruby1.8... Operating on the unstable suite Changed priority from optional to extra Changed section from ruby to oldlibs Thank you for reporting the bug, which will n

[DRE-maint] Bug#663973: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following changes were made to the overrides... Concerning package librspec-ruby1.9.1... Operating on the unstable suite Changed priority from optional to extra Changed section from ruby to oldlibs Thank you for reporting the bug, which will

[DRE-maint] Bug#663973: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following changes were made to the overrides... Concerning package librspec-ruby1.8... Operating on the unstable suite Changed priority from optional to extra Changed section from ruby to oldlibs Thank you for reporting the bug, which will n

[DRE-maint] Bug#662229: marked as done (mongrel-cluster: breaks mongrel_rails)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:14:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#663922: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #662229, regarding mongrel-cluster: breaks mongrel_rails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

[DRE-maint] Bug#663922: Removed package(s) from unstable

Version: 1.0.5-5+rm Dear submitter, as the package mongrel-cluster has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/663922

[DRE-maint] Bug#663922: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: mongrel-cluster |1.0.5-5 | source, all --- Reason --- ROM; obsolete, abandoned upstream -- Note that the pa

[DRE-maint] Bug#661401: marked as done (ruby-raindrops: FTBFS due to test suite errors)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:54:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#661401: fixed in ruby-raindrops 0.8.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #661401, regarding ruby-raindrops: FTBFS due to test suite errors to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

[DRE-maint] ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3.debian.tar.gz to main/r/ruby-raindrops/ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3.debian.tar.gz ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3.dsc to main/r/ruby-raindrops/ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3.dsc ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3_amd64.deb to main/r/ruby-raindrops/ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3_amd64.deb Changes:

[DRE-maint] Processing of ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3_amd64.changes

ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3.dsc ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3.debian.tar.gz ruby-raindrops_0.8.0-3_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___

[DRE-maint] Processed: Re: passenger: Please create "nginx" passenger module

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 651441 src:nginx 1.1.14-1 Bug #651441 [src:passenger] passenger: Please create "nginx" passenger module Bug reassigned from package 'src:passenger' to 'src:nginx'. Bug #651441 [src:nginx] passenger: Please create "nginx" passenger module

[DRE-maint] Bug#651441: passenger: Please create "nginx" passenger module

reassign 651441 src:nginx 1.1.14-1 thanks Hi, I'm reassigning this to ngnix package. I'm not too sure how this could be solved. One solution would be to embed the code of passenger (or a part of it) in debian/modules directory. But code duplication is bad(tm) Another solution could be for the

[DRE-maint] ruby-treetop 1.4.10-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the ruby-treetop source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.4.10-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day y

[DRE-maint] Processed: Re: ruby-raindrops: FTBFS due to test suite errors

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 661401 u...@debian.org Bug #661401 {Done: Dmitry Borodaenko } [src:ruby-raindrops] ruby-raindrops: FTBFS due to test suite errors 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared,

[DRE-maint] Bug#661401: ruby-raindrops: FTBFS due to test suite errors

reopen 661401 thanks Version 0.8.0-2 fixed some of the unit test failures, but not all of them: Started .E.EERaindrops::MAX = 0x .Raindrops::SIZE = 64 ./debian/ruby-raindrops//usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/raindrops/watcher.rb:181:in `aggregator_thread': undefined metho