On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:30:11PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:58:43PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > I've had a small private followup conversation with Andreas about
> > this. He basically came up with the suggestion to turn
> > debian-multime...@lists.debian.org f
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:08:20PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 17/08/10 11:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 20:15:40 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > I've had a small private followup conversation wi
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:21:02 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Is/was DeMuDi a derivative work like debian-multimedia? If so I agree
> > it is easiest to avoid it.
> >
> > If DeMuDi is/was a Debian-internal initiative simila
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:36:09PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:49:58PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
Not sure if we're talking the same: currently, 17 (16 if you count
the fixed gigedit package in experimental) contain
debian-multime...@lists.debian.org as the maintainer
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:49:58PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Not sure if we're talking the same: currently, 17 (16 if you count the
> fixed gigedit package in experimental) contain
> debian-multime...@lists.debian.org as the maintainer field.
>
> If I correctly understand the proposal, then thi
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:44:17PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Also note that we should change the maintainer address in the following
> > packages:
> >
> >
> > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
> >
> > If we want to make debian-multimedia a plac
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:30:11PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Anyway, make this the place for users and keep
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers for "internal" discussion.
>
> Also note that we should change the maintainer address in the following
> packages:
>
>http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:08:20PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > debian-multime...@lists.debian.org from a *development* oriented mailing
> > list to a *user* focused list. This way users can share their thoughts,
> > concerns and kudos.
>
> I thought this was the idea the whole time?
Yes.
>
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:58:43PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I've had a small private followup conversation with Andreas about
> this. He basically came up with the suggestion to turn
> debian-multime...@lists.debian.org from a *development* oriented mailing
> list to a *user* focused list.
Am Dienstag, den 17.08.2010, 12:08 -0400 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
> On 17/08/10 11:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 20:15:40 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >>> Perhaps? My biggest concern is that with
On 17/08/10 11:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 20:15:40 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> Perhaps? My biggest concern is that with 3 lists, it becomes more and
>>> more challenging to decide to which list t
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 20:15:40 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Perhaps? My biggest concern is that with 3 lists, it becomes more and
>> more challenging to decide to which list to post. Replies to -vcs mails
>> currently go to -
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:05:39PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> What do "Skolelinux" mean[1]?
In the sense that it was an external fork (like DeMuDi, but for
different reasons) which now in the Debian Edu effort tries to merge
back to Debian. In my eyes this currently happens also with DeMuDi
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> We could say: bug reports go to pkg-multimedia, all other discussion
> goes to debian-multimedia? I'm still not sure if it is a good move or
> not. I've not seen much discussion around multimedia going on... but
> maybe we are discou
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:10:07PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:21:02PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If DeMuDi is/was a Debian-internal initiative similar to debian-edu,
or
IMHO DeMuDi might be comparable to SkoleLinux with an attempt to
remerge to Debian (which
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Perhaps? My biggest concern is that with 3 lists, it becomes more and
> more challenging to decide to which list to post. Replies to -vcs mails
> currently go to -maintainers because of the reply-to, so I guess that
> would remain.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:21:02PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> If DeMuDi is/was a Debian-internal initiative similar to debian-edu, or
IMHO DeMuDi might be comparable to SkoleLinux with an attempt to remerge
to Debian (which is not the goal of debian-multimedia). (Please correct
me if I'
On 14/08/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:21:02 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:21:02 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> BTW
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
packaging related in
On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
>>> packaging related information which I#m not really interested in.
>>> Howeve
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
packaging related information which I#m not really interested in.
However, de just have this mailinglist debian-multime...@l.d.o
On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
> packaging related information which I#m not really interested in.
> However, de just have this mailinglist debian-multime...@l.d.o. Do you
> see a chance that we move discussion like this ab
23 matches
Mail list logo
