Am 17.06.2010 10:54, schrieb Sebastian Dröge:
You said previously that you prefer to wait for upstream to take the
shared library patch.
Upstream said, that compiling with -fPIC is what he suggests and that
this will only cause very minor performance degrations (you need to do
symbol relocation
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 10:49 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:01:50 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
> > Am 07.06.2010 11:50, schrieb Sebastian Dröge:
> >> Or at least a -fPIC static library? :)
> >
> > Reinhard? I think the new ffmpeg 0.6 will also benefit from a -PIC
>
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:01:50 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 07.06.2010 11:50, schrieb Sebastian Dröge:
>> Or at least a -fPIC static library? :)
>
> Reinhard? I think the new ffmpeg 0.6 will also benefit from a -PIC
> librtmp, isn't it?
indeed, but I don't remember what the consesus is.
Am 07.06.2010 11:50, schrieb Sebastian Dröge:
Or at least a -fPIC static library? :)
Reinhard? I think the new ffmpeg 0.6 will also benefit from a -PIC
librtmp, isn't it?
- Fabian
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-mainta
Am 07.06.2010 11:50, schrieb Sebastian Dröge:
Or at least a -fPIC static library? :)
Any news?
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimed
Am 10.06.2010 10:37, schrieb Howard Chu:
If you submit a patch I'll take a look. I'm not ready to go there yet
myself, there are other loose ends that still need to be tied up first.
Here you go!
>From 34dd288920eaf70f4a6abcecf8a63c185b9912e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Greffrath
Dat
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:37:23 (CEST), Howard Chu wrote:
> Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Hi Howard,
>>
>> in our multimedia packaging team, there is some interest by various
>> people to use librtmp inside shared libraries like libavformat.so or
>> gstreamer modules. This requires compiling the li
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Hi Howard,
in our multimedia packaging team, there is some interest by various
people to use librtmp inside shared libraries like libavformat.so or
gstreamer modules. This requires compiling the library as position
independent code (PIC).
Would you consider a patch for
Hi Howard,
in our multimedia packaging team, there is some interest by various
people to use librtmp inside shared libraries like libavformat.so or
gstreamer modules. This requires compiling the library as position
independent code (PIC).
Would you consider a patch for building a shared library
Hi all,
Am 07.06.2010 11:50, schrieb Sebastian Dröge:
Or at least a -fPIC static library? :)
given that upstream already has a rtmpsrc gstreamer-plugin in the
"bad" set waiting (thanks slomo), I'd like to take action on this
issue. My question is, how to do it best?
1) Build the library on
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 10:50 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 05.06.2010 12:02, schrieb Archive Administrator:
> > librtmp-dev_2.2e-2_i386.deb
> >to main/r/rtmpdump/librtmp-dev_2.2e-2_i386.deb
>
> I can has shared lib KTHXBYE?
Or at least a -fPIC static library? :)
signature.asc
Descripti
Am 05.06.2010 12:02, schrieb Archive Administrator:
librtmp-dev_2.2e-2_i386.deb
to main/r/rtmpdump/librtmp-dev_2.2e-2_i386.deb
I can has shared lib KTHXBYE?
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian
Accepted:
librtmp-dev_2.2e-2_i386.deb
to main/r/rtmpdump/librtmp-dev_2.2e-2_i386.deb
rtmpdump_2.2e-2.diff.gz
to main/r/rtmpdump/rtmpdump_2.2e-2.diff.gz
rtmpdump_2.2e-2.dsc
to main/r/rtmpdump/rtmpdump_2.2e-2.dsc
rtmpdump_2.2e-2_i386.deb
to main/r/rtmpdump/rtmpdump_2.2e-2_i386.deb
rtmpdump
13 matches
Mail list logo
