On 18/08/10 17:31, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I find it wrong to use popcon to judge a package as irrelevant for
Debian at all, as it is a _very_ vague measure for multiple reasons.
yes
Simon
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:03:44PM +0800, Simon Wise wrote:
On 18/08/10 02:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:22:27PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 17/08/10 12:30, Adrian Knoth wrote:
openmovieeditor: Has a new upstream release from 2009, but the
project seems dead. Pop
On 18/08/10 02:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:22:27PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 17/08/10 12:30, Adrian Knoth wrote:
openmovieeditor: Has a new upstream release from 2009, but the project
seems dead. Popcon < 1000.
Movie editors have different target groups and
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:21:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Also, I agree with Felipe that we should look at the relevancy of these
> packages first, so as to not accidentally keep alive abandoned software
> through "training sessions".
ACK.
> For all of them, we should really get in
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:22:27PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 17/08/10 12:30, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:58:43PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I've had a small private followup conversation with Andreas about
this. He basically came up with the suggestion to turn
deb
On 17/08/10 12:30, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:58:43PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
>> I've had a small private followup conversation with Andreas about
>> this. He basically came up with the suggestion to turn
>> debian-multime...@lists.debian.org from a *development* ori
