Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-31 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2013/8/31 Sebastian Ramacher > > Done. > Thank you! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-31 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2013-08-31 12:37:30, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2013/8/30 Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > On 2013-08-28 12:25:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > > Should something else to be done? > > > > I added some files to debian/clean and code to remove build/ in > > debian/rules prevent FTBFS if built twice in a row

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-31 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2013/8/30 Sebastian Ramacher > > On 2013-08-28 12:25:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > Should something else to be done? > > I added some files to debian/clean and code to remove build/ in > debian/rules prevent FTBFS if built twice in a row. I also added a DEP-8 > test for the python3-liblo package.

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-30 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Jaromir, first of all, I'm sorry for the delay. On 2013-08-28 12:25:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Should something else to be done? I added some files to debian/clean and code to remove build/ in debian/rules prevent FTBFS if built twice in a row. I also added a DEP-8 test for the python3-liblo

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-28 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2013/8/28 Sebastian Ramacher > On 2013-08-28 00:25:29, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > The attached patch definitely did it for me. Well, except for the test > > failure of course. > > ... and for the test failure maybe the attached patch is enough. > Looks fine to me , but I am not python gur

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2013-08-28 00:25:29, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2013-08-27 22:42:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > 2013/8/27 Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > > > > To run the tests, the extensions modules need to be available in > > > PYTHONPATH. Starting with something like the test targets found at > > > https:/

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2013-08-27 22:42:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2013/8/27 Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > To run the tests, the extensions modules need to be available in > > PYTHONPATH. Starting with something like the test targets found at > > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide, one could use > > > >

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-27 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2013/8/27 Sebastian Ramacher > > To run the tests, the extensions modules need to be available in > PYTHONPATH. Starting with something like the test targets found at > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide, one could use > > # Callable functions to determine the correct PYTHONPATH > p

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi, On 2013-08-26 22:19:02, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2013/8/26 Sebastian Ramacher > > Hi Sebastian, > > * The package contains tests, so please run them at build time. > > > > * One of the test fails. This should be investigated. > > > > | ==

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-26 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2013/8/26 Sebastian Ramacher Hi Sebastian, * The package contains tests, so please run them at build time. > > * One of the test fails. This should be investigated. > > | == > | ERROR: testSendVarious (unit.ServerTestCase) >

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-26 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2013-08-26 15:35:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2013/8/26 Sebastian Ramacher > > > On 2013-08-26 13:24:13, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > > > > I thought I already have DM flag ;( > > > > You do. Uploads adding a new binary package have to go through NEW and > > DMs can not upload to NEW. So you need a

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-26 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2013/8/26 Sebastian Ramacher > On 2013-08-26 13:24:13, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > > I thought I already have DM flag ;( > > You do. Uploads adding a new binary package have to go through NEW and > DMs can not upload to NEW. So you need a DD for this upload. > > I can take a look at it later tonight

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-26 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2013-08-26 13:24:13, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2013/8/26 Debian FTP Masters > > > > > ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed > > > > I thought I already have DM flag ;( You do. Uploads adding a new binary package have to go through NEW and DMs can not upload to NEW. So you need a DD for this uploa

Re: pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-26 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2013/8/26 Debian FTP Masters > > ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed > I thought I already have DM flag ;( Alessio can you fix it please? ;) mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://li

pyliblo_0.9.1-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-08-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia