Re: priority 'optional' vs 'extra'

2013-12-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-12-18 13:12, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > ok, i filed following bugreports: libclthreads2 #732498 [...] that list missed a few that hadn't been acknowledged yet. a more dynamic list can be found here... http://bugs.debian.org/

Re: priority 'optional' vs 'extra'

2013-12-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-12-17 15:03, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2013-12-16 23:50, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> Please do so in any I'm uploader. >> same here ... > > thanks for the heads up. > ok, i filed following bugreports: libclthreads2 #7324

Fwd: priority 'optional' vs 'extra'

2013-12-17 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Sorry ... now sended to list 2013/12/17 IOhannes m zmoelnig > > > and there are a few packages where i believe that the section is wrong: > vamp-plugin-sdk: libvamp-hostsdk3 sound/optional -> libs/optional > vamp-plugin-sdk: libvamp-sdk2 sound/optional -> libs/optional > Fixed mira __

Re: priority 'optional' vs 'extra'

2013-12-17 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:03 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > csound : libcsnd-dev libdevel/extra -> libdevel/optional > csound : libcsound64-dev libdevel/extra -> libdevel/optional > csound : libcsoundac-dev libdevel/extra -> libdevel/optional Corrected the control.in fi

Re: priority 'optional' vs 'extra'

2013-12-17 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-12-16 23:50, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> Please do so in any I'm uploader. >>> > same here ... thanks for the heads up. i did a more thorough check which priorities need to be updated in these packages, and found that some of these packages ha