-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-04-26 18:40, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> I am not saying the same version of the same Makefile
sure.
> What made the current thing hard to fix?
nothing. it was trivial.
> This HURD/kFreeBSD
> build issue was going to be fixed upst
On Apr 25, 2011, at 1:44 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/25/2011 06:13 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I'd like to keep the short-form dh packages
i think everybody now agrees that what we are discussing should be
irrelevant of whether a s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/25/2011 06:13 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I'd like to keep the short-form dh packages
i think everybody now agrees that what we are discussing should be
irrelevant of whether a specific package uses dh or cdbs or whatever.
> that I've
On Apr 24, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 13:02, IOhannes m zmoelnig
wrote:
I see that some bugs (buils system, mostly) will require uploading
all
(or most) of the pd externals. Can we do something to avoid that?
hmm, i'm not sure if i understand what y
On 11-04-24 at 09:39pm, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 06:26:37PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 11-04-24 at 12:16pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the key part: for most pd externals, the makefile is
> > > essentially the same. Does it make sense to centr
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 06:26:37PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-04-24 at 12:16pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >
> > This is the key part: for most pd externals, the makefile is
> > essentially the same. Does it make sense to centralize that? What do
> > others think?
>
> Do you mean using
On 11-04-24 at 12:16pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 13:02, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> >>
> >> I see that some bugs (buils system, mostly) will require uploading
> >> all (or most) of the pd externals. Can we do something to avoid
> >> that?
> >>
> > hmm, i'm not sure if i u
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 13:02, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>
>> I see that some bugs (buils system, mostly) will require uploading all
>> (or most) of the pd externals. Can we do something to avoid that?
>>
> hmm, i'm not sure if i understand what you mean:
> i thought bugs can only be fixed by pr
>
> I see that some bugs (buils system, mostly) will require uploading all
> (or most) of the pd externals. Can we do something to avoid that?
>
hmm, i'm not sure if i understand what you mean:
i thought bugs can only be fixed by providing fixed versions.
if a package is FTBFS because of broken
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:35, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported.
> i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if
> somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported.
i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if
somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i
don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).
Other
11 matches
Mail list logo
