Re: lv2fil package reversion

2014-04-27 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
You are right ... I just asked for removal ... I should do it earlier. Thanks for reminder. best regards mira 2014-04-27 17:39 GMT+02:00 Erik Ackermann : > Sure I will give it a try, but something should be fine about this broken > package. > On Apr 27, 2014 7:41 AM, "Jaromír Mikeš" wrote: >

Re: lv2fil package reversion

2014-04-27 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hi Eric, have you tried eq10q package? It provides nice parametric eq lv2 plugin. mira 2014-04-26 21:43 GMT+02:00 Erik Ackermann : > lv2fil package should be either removed or reverted, as it is broken. > Personally I think a revert is preferable since the package has value. > > > On Mon, Jan

Re: lv2fil package reversion

2014-04-26 Thread Erik Ackermann
lv2fil package should be either removed or reverted, as it is broken. Personally I think a revert is preferable since the package has value. On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Erik Ackermann wrote: > Any progress on this? Just tried installing the package again and it is > still the same broken v

Re: lv2fil package reversion

2013-01-21 Thread Erik Ackermann
Any progress on this? Just tried installing the package again and it is still the same broken version. On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jaromír Mikeš > wrote: > > Ok, but I would like to know opinion of Alessio as he is person with best

Re: lv2fil package reversion

2012-11-03 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2012/11/2 Erik Ackermann > > I agree this package's project is no longer active, however personally I > would rather see it reverted to its last stable version than removed > entirely as it is still the best open parametric eq i've been able to find. > Particularly with the forthcoming release of

Re: lv2fil package reversion

2012-11-03 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Ok, but I would like to know opinion of Alessio as he is person with best > knowledge of new 1.2.0 LV2 standard. > Alessio can you comment pls? We could try to revert the package to the last stable release, we should ask the release team bef

Re: lv2fil package reversion

2012-11-02 Thread Erik Ackermann
Hello Jaromír, I agree this package's project is no longer active, however personally I would rather see it reverted to its last stable version than removed entirely as it is still the best open parametric eq i've been able to find. Particularly with the forthcoming release of Ardour 3 final I thi

Re: lv2fil package reversion

2012-11-02 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2012/10/8 Erik Ackermann : > The lv2fil package was updated during Oneiric to a broken git snapshot. > According to your Packages overview, "2.0-1" is still listed as the stable > version. Can we revert the Ubuntu version to the stable version? > > The project is no longer active, and 2.0-1 is the

Re: lv2fil package reversion

2012-10-31 Thread Erik Ackermann
Friendly ping. I would be happy to revert the broken package myself if I could be given permissions and pointed to some instructions. On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Erik Ackermann wrote: > Hi Debian Multimedia Maintainers, > > The lv2fil package was updated during Oneiric to a broken git snapsho

lv2fil package reversion

2012-10-08 Thread Erik Ackermann
Hi Debian Multimedia Maintainers, The lv2fil package was updated during Oneiric to a broken git snapshot. According to your Packages overview, "2.0-1" is still listed as the stable version. Can we revert the Ubuntu version to the stable version? The project is no longer active, and 2.0-1 is the l