Hi,
On 01/01/17 20:11, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 18:30:51 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Quoting James Cowgill (2017-01-01 16:57:17)
>>> Are there any opinions about all this? My current thinking is that
>>> option 2 is too invasive to be done for stretch (if we want to do it
On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 18:30:51 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting James Cowgill (2017-01-01 16:57:17)
> > Are there any opinions about all this? My current thinking is that
> > option 2 is too invasive to be done for stretch (if we want to do it
> > at all), but option 1 might be possible (i
Quoting James Cowgill (2017-01-01 16:57:17)
> Are there any opinions about all this? My current thinking is that
> option 2 is too invasive to be done for stretch (if we want to do it
> at all), but option 1 might be possible (if it gets through NEW in
> time).
Deadline for getting through NEW
Hi all,
As a bit of background, both libmodplug and OpenMPT are descendants of
the original ModPlug Tracker. libmodplug was forked in 1999 using the
open-source player components of ModPlug, originally to create an XMMS
plugin which could play module music. In 2004 OpenMPT (Open ModPlug
Tracker) w
