Hi Joachim,
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, Joachim Bauch wrote:
all your concerns have been addressed as discussed in the upload of
"libde265 0.8-1" which is now pending in the NEW queue:
great, thanks alot and marked for accept.
Thorsten
___
pkg-multimed
Hi Thorsten,
On 30.07.2014 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> unfortunately I have to reject your package.
>
> According to the file headers (dec265/* and libde265/* both say they are
> part of libde265) you mix GPLv3- and LGPLv3-code and say that the result
> is LGPLv3 (in Readme.md). This is n
On 08.08.2014 17:35, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Uploaded.
Great, thanks!
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On 2014-08-08 17:24:37, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> On 08.08.2014 17:21, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> [...]
> > Please update the date in the changelog trailer to match today's date
> > (run dch -r again) and then I'll build and upload.
>
> Done.
Uploaded.
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Descrip
On 08.08.2014 17:21, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
[...]
> Please update the date in the changelog trailer to match today's date
> (run dch -r again) and then I'll build and upload.
Done.
Best regards,
Joachim
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
On 2014-08-08 17:11:27, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> All reported issues have been changed in the repository on alioth.
Great :)
> Please let me know if there is anything you want to have changed, or
> are happy to upload it now ;-)
Please update the date in the changelog trailer to match today's date
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for the detailed feedback.
On 08.08.2014 16:29, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> If Alessio (or someone else) doesn't beat me, here are some points that I'd
> like to see fixed before I'd upload it:
[...]
All reported issues have been changed in the repository on alioth.
> * (T
Hi Joachim
On 2014-08-07 09:49:27, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> Dear team,
>
> On 31.07.2014 12:02, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> [...]
> > I understand. We created a new release that contains all your feedback.
> >
> > @Alessio: could you (or any other uploader) please review my changes
> > and create/uploa
Hi Joachim,
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Joachim Bauch wrote:
just a quick follow-up on my last mail. As this is my first package I'm
not sure if there is anything else I should do, or if I should just wait
until someone finds some time to upload it.
you need to prod your sponsor more often. Otherwise
Dear team,
On 31.07.2014 12:02, Joachim Bauch wrote:
[...]
> I understand. We created a new release that contains all your feedback.
>
> @Alessio: could you (or any other uploader) please review my changes
> and create/upload a new package of "libde265"?
>
> I updated the git repository on aliot
Hi Fabian,
On 04.08.2014 09:18, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2014, 12:02 +0200 schrieb Joachim Bauch:
>> - Fixed "debian/watch" to download release tarball, not source tarball.
>
> I don' understand this change. If the "release tarball" does not contain
> the sources, this
Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2014, 12:02 +0200 schrieb Joachim Bauch:
> - Fixed "debian/watch" to download release tarball, not source tarball.
I don' understand this change. If the "release tarball" does not contain
the sources, this is most probably wrong.
- Fabian
_
Hi Thorsten,
thanks for the detailed feedback, please see my comments below.
On 30.07.2014 16:05, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> ok, so I would suggest to change the header of those application files
> from "This file is part of libde265." to something like "This file is
> part of a sample applicatio
Hi Joachim,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, Joachim Bauch wrote:
The decoder library "libde265" which is LGPLv3 is compiled only from
the sources in folder "libde265" (and subfolders).
The folders "dec265" (and "sherlock265") contain example applications
that use the decoder (through dynamic linking of th
Hi Thorsten,
thanks for the feedback to the package. Please find my comments about
LGPLv3 / GPLv3 below.
On 30.07.2014 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> unfortunately I have to reject your package.
>
> According to the file headers (dec265/* and libde265/* both say they are
> part of libde265)
Dear Maintainer,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
According to the file headers (dec265/* and libde265/* both say they are
part of libde265) you mix GPLv3- and LGPLv3-code and say that the result
is LGPLv3 (in Readme.md). This is not possible as the result must be GPLv3.
Can you p
16 matches
Mail list logo
