Hi,
On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 23:57 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
> On 18.10.2015 23:20, James Cowgill wrote:
> > For rapicon, there was a lull in development (as you can see on the
> > github contributors page) early 2014, just before the package was
> > removed.
> > From this page it was failing to build
Thanks James.
I've read up on the maintainer intro as far as I could.
Up to now, I started the packaging efforts and have filed an ITP.
On 18.10.2015 23:20, James Cowgill wrote:
> For rapicon, there was a lull in development (as you can see on the
> github contributors page) early 2014, just bef
Hi,
On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 22:43 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/beast
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rapicorn
>
> show that Beast and Rapicorn have been removed from Debian last year.
>
> Reading up on the bug reports, it seems that:
> a) It was assumed
Hello all,
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/beast
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rapicorn
show that Beast and Rapicorn have been removed from Debian last year.
Reading up on the bug reports, it seems that:
a) It was assumed the packages are unmaintained upstream;
b) a guile-1.8 dependency of Beast
