On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 17:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-01-19 at 07:06pm, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On 12-01-19 at 02:24pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> > During the past month or so I've been very busy, and haven't been
>> > able to finish up the new upstream release of csound. I believe the
On 12-01-19 at 07:06pm, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-01-19 at 02:24pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > During the past month or so I've been very busy, and haven't been
> > able to finish up the new upstream release of csound. I believe the
> > package is working fine, but I haven't tested extensive
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 15:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-01-19 at 02:24pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> During the past month or so I've been very busy, and haven't been able
>> to finish up the new upstream release of csound. I believe the package
>> is working fine, but I haven't tested extens
On 12-01-19 at 02:24pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> During the past month or so I've been very busy, and haven't been able
> to finish up the new upstream release of csound. I believe the package
> is working fine, but I haven't tested extensively. But in particular,
> I would welcome anyone doing a
On 12-01-19 at 02:24pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> During the past month or so I've been very busy, and haven't been able
> to finish up the new upstream release of csound. I believe the package
> is working fine, but I haven't tested extensively. But in particular,
> I would welcome anyone doing a
Hi all,
During the past month or so I've been very busy, and haven't been able
to finish up the new upstream release of csound. I believe the package
is working fine, but I haven't tested extensively. But in particular,
I would welcome anyone doing a copyright review of the changes in both
version
